|
“The only thing necessary for these diseases to the triumph is for good people and governments to do nothing.” |
How to Recognize and Treat
Acute HIV Syndrome-#1
BARBARA LEE
PERLMUTTER, M.D., PH.D., JORDAN B. GLASER, M.D., and SAMWEL O. OYUGI, M.D.
Staten Island University Hospital
Staten Island, New York
Part
2
The diagnosis of acute
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) syndrome requires a high index of
suspicion and proper laboratory testing. Patients with the syndrome may have
fever, fatigue, rash, pharyngitis or other symptoms. Primary HIV infection
should be considered in any patient with possible HIV exposure who presents
with fever of unknown cause. The diagnosis is based on a positive HIV-1 RNA
level (more than 50,000 copies per mL) in the absence of a positive
enzyme-linked immunosorbent antibody assay (ELISA) and confirmatory Western
blot antibody test for HIV. Early diagnosis permits patient education as
well as treatment that may delay disease progression. Triple-combination
antiretroviral therapy should be started immediately and continued
indefinitely. Compliance with medication regimens is essential to maximize
benefit and discourage the development of viral resistance. (Am Fam
Physician 1999;60:535-46.)
In the spring of
1986, a 24-year-old bisexual man presented with fever, markedly swollen
cervical nodes and an exudative tonsillitis. He had dyspnea and cough with a
normal chest radiograph. No pathogens were identified. It was thought that
he might have the new disease called "acquired immunodeficiency syndrome"
(AIDS), but a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody test was negative.
He was treated for possible Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and his
symptoms resolved in the ensuing two weeks. Three months later, he tested
positive for HIV-1 antibody on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA),
and the finding was confirmed by a Western blot test. He progressed to AIDS
and died within 10 years.
Today this man's
presentation would be recognized as acute HIV syndrome. It is now known that
50 to 90 percent of patients acutely infected with HIV experience at least
some symptoms of the acute retroviral syndrome.1
The most common findings of the syndrome are fever (80 to 90 percent),
fatigue (70 to 90 percent), rash (40 to 80 percent), headache (32 to 70
percent) and lymphadenopathy (40 to 70 percent). Additional findings include
pharyngitis, myalgia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and other symptoms2
(Table 1).3
Symptoms usually develop within days to weeks after HIV exposure and last
from a few days to several months, but usually less than 14 days.3
|
TABLE 1
Frequency of Symptoms and Findings Associated with Acute HIV
Infection
|
|
Symptoms or
findings
|
Percentage of
patients
|
|
Fever |
>80 to 90 |
|
Fatigue |
>70 to 90 |
|
Rash |
>40 to 80 |
|
Headache |
32 to 70 |
|
Lymphadenopathy
|
40 to 70 |
|
Pharyngitis |
50 to 70 |
|
Myalgia or
arthralgia |
50 to 70 |
|
Nausea, vomiting
or diarrhea |
30 to 60 |
|
Night sweats |
50 |
|
Aseptic
meningitis |
24 |
|
Oral ulcers |
10 to 20 |
|
Genital ulcers |
5 to 15 |
|
Thrombocytopenia
|
45 |
|
Leukopenia |
40 |
|
Elevated hepatic
enzyme levels |
21 |
|
HIV=human immunodeficiency virus.
Adapted with permission from Kahn
JO, Walker BD. Acute human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection.
N Engl J Med 1998;339:33-9. |
|
The differential
diagnosis of the early findings of acute HIV infection can be confusing.
Because of a low index of suspicion, the diagnosis is missed in as many as
75 percent of patients.3
Acute HIV infection may resemble infectious mononucleosis, influenza, severe
streptococcal pharyngitis, viral hepatitis, toxoplasmosis or even secondary
syphilis (Table 2). For example, a patient with symptoms suggestive
of HIV infection could actually be an HIV-negative young adult manifesting
for the first time the effects of a primary immunodeficiency disease
involving B-cell and/or T-cell dysfunction. (Immunoglobulin A deficiency--by
far the most common immunodeficient condition--often presents after the age
of 21 years.4) On the
other hand, a patient who returns from the tropics with an unexplained
febrile illness is frequently assumed to have malaria, typhoid,
schistosomiasis, filariasis or an intestinal helminthic infection but may
actually have HIV infection. One study found that 3 percent of such
travelers were infected with HIV.5
In areas where AIDS and malaria are endemic, 23 percent of fevers are
ultimately attributable to HIV infection and only 15 percent to malaria.6
Age is also a factor, with the diagnosis of acute HIV infection often
delayed in patients over 50 years old.7
Primary care physicians
will be the first to encounter many of the new cases of HIV infection.
Because the source person usually will not have appeared to be ill during
contact, the newly presenting symptomatic patient will not recognize the
possibility of having acquired HIV infection. However, when a patient
presents with fever and fatigue, a sexually transmitted disease or a
suggestive symptom complex, the possibility of HIV exposure or high-risk
behavior should be reviewed.
Besides obviously risky
behavior such as unprotected sex (vaginal, oral or anal) and intravenous
illicit drug use (involving shared needles or a common "cooker" into which
several syringes are dipped), less obvious sources of HIV infection should
be investigated. Young athletes have been known to inject testosterone using
a shared syringe. The shared, sharpened plastic "straw" used to sniff
cocaine may transmit HIV by way of the nasal mucosa. Body piercing and
tattooing may increase the risk of HIV exposure. Occupational exposure is a
possible but rare source of HIV infection in health care workers.
Diagnosing Acute HIV
Infection
Blood taken during the
acute phase of HIV infection (days to weeks after exposure) may show
lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia, but atypical lymphocytes are infrequent.
The CD4 count usually remains normal. The HIV-1 antibody tests (ELISA and
Western blot test), the only tests officially used to diagnose established
HIV infection, do not become positive until three or four weeks (sometimes
even months) after the infection is acquired.
On the other hand, the
quantitative plasma HIV-1 RNA level (viral load) by polymerase chain
reaction (PCR), which is 95 to 98 percent sensitive for HIV,
8 becomes positive within 11 days of infection.9
During the symptomatic phase of acute HIV infection, the viral RNA shows in
excess of 50,000 copies per mL.3
Three instances of false-positive HIV-1-RNA tests have been reported; in
each instance, however, the person was not having symptoms, and the viral
load was less than 2,000 copies per mL.10
The presence of high-titer HIV-I RNA (more than 50,000 copies per mL) in the
absence of HIV antibodies establishes the diagnosis of acute HIV infection.3,11
|
TABLE 2
Differential Diagnosis of Acute HIV Infection
|
|
Primary
cytomegalovirus infection
Drug reaction
Epstein-Barr
virus mononucleosis
Viral
hepatitis
Primary
herpes simplex virus infection
Influenza
Severe
(streptococcal) pharyngitis
Secondary
syphilis
Toxoplasmosis
Rubella
Brucellosis
Malaria |
|
HIV=human
immunodeficiency virus. |
|
HIV-1 antibody and viral
load tests are readily available through commercial laboratories and should
be performed whenever a patient presents with signs and symptoms of acute
HIV syndrome and a history that is compatible with HIV infection. If viral
RNA quantitation is not available, a serum or plasma p24 antigen test may be
used to detect viral infection before the appearance of HIV antibodies.
If acute HIV infection is
strongly suspected but the HIV-1 RNA PCR test is negative or shows a low
titer, the initial high level of viral RNA may have already subsided. The
patient should be followed with HIV-1 antibody tests at three months, six
months and one year. If these tests remain negative, another diagnosis
should be considered.
Benefits and Risks of
Treatment
Even though treatment of
acute primary HIV infection may seem difficult, compelling reports indicate
that the administration of potent antiretroviral therapy can result in a
rapid and sustained decline in the viral load to below the limit of
detection within three months.12,13
Furthermore, studies of CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte dynamics show restoration of
the normal ratio, reflecting recovery of the immune system.14
In one investigation of HIV-1specific cell-mediated immune responsiveness,
treatment of acute HIV infection resulted in the restoration of
virus-specific immunity with control of viremia in six of six persons
studied.15
Early institution of
antiretroviral therapy has the advantage of keeping the viral load low by
reducing replication and the appearance of resistant HIV phenotypes. It also
may prevent immune depletion because of increased immune stimulation
resulting from the strong antigenicity of HIV during primary infection.16
This allows for a more favorable initial immune response to HIV.
In isolated cases,
treatment has been stopped after a period of time with no adverse effects.
For example, the "Berlin patient" was treated aggressively for six months
after acute HIV infection; the patient then stopped taking the medications
but remained free of symptoms with barely detectable HIV-1 RNA for more than
one year.17 However, other
patients have rebounded after stopping treatment.18
The results of stopping antiretroviral medications at some point after the
early initiation of therapy are currently being studied.
If acute HIV infection is
not treated, the signs and symptoms disappear, along with the viremia. The
person enters a prolonged stage of hidden viral replication during which the
virus may not be culturable from the blood and HIV-1 RNA levels may be low
or undetectable. During the next five to 10 years, lymph node architecture
is destroyed, certain CD4 and CD8 cell lines are gradually depleted and
progression to symptomatic disease ultimately occurs (Figure 1).19
Some subtle effects develop, reflecting early encephalopathy,20
but the liver, kidneys and lipid metabolism are spared.
Part
2
|
Email:

|
|