Education + Advocacy = Change

Click a topic below for an index of articles:

New-Material

Home

Alternative-Treatments

Financial or Socio-Economic Issues

Forum

Health Insurance

Hepatitis

HIV/AIDS

Institutional Issues

International Reports

Legal Concerns

Math Models or Methods to Predict Trends

Medical Issues

Our Sponsors

Occupational Concerns

Our Board

Religion and infectious diseases

State Governments

Stigma or Discrimination Issues

If you would like to submit an article to this website, email us at info@heart-intl.net for a review of this paper

 

any words all words
Results per page:

“The only thing necessary for these diseases to the triumph is for good people and governments to do nothing.”


    

Examples of Stigma and Discrimination

http://www.aidslaw.ca/

Employment

The workplace remains a potentially unsafe environment for people with HIV/AIDS, whether they are currently at work, returning to work, or looking for work for the first time. People with HIV/AIDS in the workplace:

  • have experienced breaches of confidentiality regarding their HIV status;
  • have often not had their needs accommodated with respect to the duties they are able to perform, the schedule and side effects of their drug regimen, the time required for medical appointments, and the need for leave for temporary illnesses;
  • have experienced cuts to their benefits or have been laid off because of the cost to the employer of disability insurance or drug insurance premiums;
  • have sometimes not claimed their benefits – or may not take antiretroviral therapy at all – for fear of disclosure, harassment, and being fired; and
  • have sometimes found themselves in an environment in which they have been harassed, avoided, or ostracized.
  

While the new antiretroviral drug regimes have brought better health for some, and the possibility of returning to work, they have also brought new workplace hazards. People taking these drugs must adhere to strictly regimented dosage schedules and they often suffer side effects. This can lead to de facto disclosure of HIV status. In addition, employers or co-workers may not accommodate the needs associated with these regimes. As one person reported:

A person living with HIV/AIDS was told to remove the pills from his desk – something he did in order to remind himself to take them – because they made other employees uncomfortable; a minor example, yet still telling: why were the other employees not educated?

Health Care

In the first decade of the epidemic, there were flagrant and explicit examples of discrimination against people with HIV/AIDS in health-care settings. These included refusing to provide care, avoiding or neglecting patients, and making prejudicial remarks. Such incidents have decreased, but there are still many examples of inappropriate treatment:

  • Some health-care workers continue to refuse to treat people with HIV/AIDS.
  • People with HIV/AIDS are sometimes refused medical procedures not related to HIV/AIDS, such as cardiac care.
  • Primary-care physicians often do not offer HIV testing or fail to diagnose HIV-related symptoms among people who are not readily identified with a “risk group”.
  • In contrast to hospitals that specialize in HIV/AIDS care (which appear, for the most part, to provide services in a way that is knowledgeable, supportive, and non-discriminatory), there are many difficulties in hospitals that see fewer HIV patients.
  • Breaches of confidentiality remain frequent.
  • Some physicians refuse to prescribe combination therapies for certain groups of people – such as drug users and the homeless – because they assume these people will not be able to maintain the drug regimen.

Insurance

People with HIV/AIDS depend on public or private insurance for health care, drugs, and income support. Thanks to Canada’s universal public health-care insurance, coverage for physicians’ services and hospital care is not among the larger problems that people with HIV/AIDS must deal with. But income support and drug coverage is another matter.

  

Definition of disability
The definition used to determine eligibility for benefits under public and private insurance plans has historically been based on a pattern of long-term, permanent disability. Such definitions are not appropriate to the cyclical and episodic nature of HIV disease. People with HIV may experience periods of relatively good health that are interrupted by periods of severe illness. Although combinations of drugs including protease inhibitors have dramatically improved the health status of many people with HIV, they have made problems of definition of disability even more acute. There is an increasing trend toward out-and-out denial for short- and long-term benefits: insurers fail to acknowledge that some people cannot take protease inhibitors, that treatment is often accompanied by debilitating side effects, that improved health status is not immediate, and that indicators other than physical functioning must be taken into account.

Exclusion criteria in private income insurance plans
Exclusion criteria affect people with HIV/AIDS in a number of ways. They may not qualify for income insurance on account of a pre-existing condition of HIV disease. If a person does qualify for coverage (or qualified in the past before acquiring HIV), they may be forced to remain with their present employer (even if they would prefer to change employment), since it is unlikely that they will qualify for coverage with a new employer. If they are receiving disability benefits but wish to return to work, they may be discouraged from doing so if the terms of their coverage limits their entitlement to further benefits should their health deteriorate again.

Public income support programs
To obtain income in periods of short- or long-term disability, people with HIV/AIDS turn to Employment Insurance, disability benefits under the Canada Pension Plan, and, as a last resort, social assistance in the form of welfare and family benefits. These programs present a variety of problems for people with HIV/AIDS, largely because they are not designed for people with cyclical or episodic illness.

Drug insurance
People with HIV/AIDS experience multiple problems in obtaining coverage or benefits for HIV/AIDS drugs through their employment. For example: (1) Insurers offer plans and employers adopt plans that limit claims to a set amount, for example $2000 a year. This barely covers one month’s worth of drugs for a person with HIV/AIDS; (2) While some provinces have instituted catastrophic drug coverage for individuals who are employed but cannot afford their medications, people are still required to pay for the drugs initially, and must then apply to be reimbursed. (3) People making claims for drug benefits through their employer have suffered breaches of confidentiality and subsequent harassment or dismissal.

Other Areas of Discrimination

These are not the only areas where discrimination occurs. Other areas include housing, travel and immigration, family and community, and community-based services (consult HIV/AIDS and Discrimination: A Discussion Paper for examples).