|
1. When and what first sparked your
interest and writing about aids?
*Before the AIDS epidemic became
official in 1981, I had been studying cancer and had
found bacteria (not viruses) in certain cancers. In
particular, as a dermatologist I had studied
"classic" cases of Kaposi's sarcoma in older non-gay
men.
This work and subsequent KS research
was published in 1981 in scientific journals --- but
it was totally ignored when the AIDS epidemic hit
and when KS became widely known with the infamous
(in my opinion) term "gay cancer." At the time, I
felt (and still do) that scientists were not telling
the whole truth about AIDS and its origin from
biological warfare and from cancer virus research
that took place extensively in the decade before
AIDS, namely the 1970s.
2. In Queer blood, the secret aids
genocide plot, you mention that in the 1960s, a
group of bio warfare experts appeared before a
United nations panel estimated that a large scale
killing operation of the general population would
cost $2,000 per square kilometer with conventional
weapons. $800 with nuclear weapons, and $ 1 dolor
with biological weapons.
Do you believe this was the primary
objective for the research and testing of these
biological agents back in the 60s at Fort Detrick
and other places or was it something else?
*Governments are always seeking new
biological warfare agents, just as they are always
seeking more powerful military weapons. Bioweapons
are indeed the cheapest form of warfare. They kill
yet they maintain the infrastructure, unless one
uses microbes such as deadly anthrax spores that can
contaminate an environment for centuries.
3. In 1986, a researcher contacted
Pearce Wright at the London times with information
on the origin of AIDS and how the AIDS virus was
injected, via a small pox vaccine into millions of
Africans. Do you know if this researcher ever
reveled his identity?
* No, I don't know the identity of
this person. After the smallpox vaccine story hit
the front-page of The London Times, the story was
subsequently killed and never appeared again in any
of the world major media. The story suggested the
smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by
the World Health Organization was responsible for
unleashing AIDS in Africa. About 100 million
Africans living in central Africa were inoculated by
the WHO.The vaccine was held responsible for
awakening a "dormant" AIDS virus on the continent. I
am sure the "big business" of vaccine makers had
something to do with censoring the story. Also the
Times story provided another explanation for the
outbreak in Africa other than the widely-accepted
"monkey in the African jungle" theory of HIV/AIDS.
4. Do you believe it was the Bovine
visna virus and the sheep visna virus, that was used
to create the AIDS virus and how similar do these
viruses look to the AIDS virus under a microscope?
* I am not a virologist and I would
never speculate exactly how HIV was "made." Suffice
to say, I believe HIV came out of primate (monkey,
chimp) animal cancer research whereby primates were
injected (before AIDS) with various cancer-causing
and immunosuppressive viruses -- and these viruses
were transferred between various animal species as
well and adapted to human tissue. All of this was
part of the "war on cancer" conducted by the
National Cancer Institute. The NCI also had close
ties to the U.S. biological warfare establishment.
The military's biological warfare unit at Ft
Detrick, Maryland, was joined to the National Cancer
Institute in the early 1970s, by order of President
Richard Nixon.
4a. In an article entitled WHO
Murdered Africa (The Man Made Origin of AIDS) by
WILLIAM CAMPBELL DOUGLASS, MD states that it is
wrong to believe that you cant get AIDS from
mosquitoes. Also that the virus can't live outside
the body. Is this belief still held to be true.
*How can one be 100% sure mosquitoes
could (or could not) theoretically spread AIDS? I
couldn't swear to it. Robert Strecker MD, who was
one of the originators of the man-made theory of
AIDS, used to say: allow mosquitoes to feed on AIDS
patients' blood. Then put doctors who don't believe
in the insect spread of HIV in a closed space and
let the mosquitoes feed on them. And then later test
them for HIV. I am not sure many physicians would
sign up for the experiment.
5. When you first met Robert Strecker
MD. you asked him about the gay AIDS relation to
Africa and he told you that there isn't any and that
it was just a cover up to hide the real truth that
Africans were infected during the small pox vaccine
programs and that Africa is doomed.
* There is NO PROOF that AIDS, which
first appeared EXCLUSIVELY in young (primarily
white) gay men in Manhattan, came from Africa. This
is yet another myth about AIDS. How could a supposed
black heterosexual African epidemic transform itself
into an EXCLUSIVELY WHITE YOUNG GAY MENS' DISEASE IN
MANHATTAN? In my opinion this is biologically
impossible. Furthermore, there was no "incubation
period" for HIV in America. As soon as the
government-sponsored gay hepatitis B experiment
(1978-1981) ended in Manhattan in 1981 the epidemic
became official. The first cases of AIDS in gay men
appeared in Manhattan in 1979, soon after the gay
experiment began in Manhattan, New York City.
Strecker believes that the World
Health Organization spelled out this diabolical plan
back in a 1972 memorandum. Do you know if there were
any cases of AIDS in Africa prior to 1979 as
indicated by several scientists like Dr Ho and
others
* There are no PROVEN cases of AIDS
in Africa prior to 1979. According to Luc
Montagnier, the French Pasteur scientist who first
isolated HIV in Paris, the African epidemic did not
break out until the Autumn of 1982 at the earliest.
(See, Luc Montagnier, VIRUS, page 122. ) When AIDS
was officially recognized in 1981, there was NO
EVIDENCE of an African epidemic at that time.
Also do you think africa is doomed or
do you see any hope?
* Without effective anti-HIV therapy,
such as the current AIDS "cocktail drugs", most
people succomb to AIDS quickly. Poor people in
third-world countries obviously can't afford these
life-saving drugs. Ergo, many, many will die. I am
not sure how I would define "doomed", but certainly
if 20, 30, or 40% or more of a distinct population
dies, that is "doomed" in my opinion.
6. Dr Lenord Horowitz has indicated
that some of these scientists worked in the eugenic
concentration camp experiments with Dr Mengele and
that this was apart of operation paperclip? Have you
uncovered anything like this during your
investigations?
* No, but Nazi-type mentality occurs
among some people from many cultures. There are
people nowadays that believe Americans have turned
into Nazis because of the Iraq war - and the
suppression of freedoms, once guaranteed by the
Constitution - all as a result of the so called war
on terror.
7. It has been documented that
biological warfare was first practiced on Native
Americans with the use of Smallpox and Tuberculosis
in the 1800 and 1900s etc .biological experiments
were also conducted on African Americans in the 60s
with syphilis written about in the book Bad blood
and a higher form of killing.
Do you think that homosexual men In
New York were used as part of this experiment to
find out how this virus worked on a relatively
smaller level, in order to then use the information
to infect the blacks in Africa on a much wider level
etc. Or was it basically used on both at the same
time more or less for the same reasons?
* I don't know exactly what was on
the mind of those who infected gays and blacks with
HIV (and the "new" KS virus as well). The epidemic
could definitely serve as a population control
measure. The fact that the man-made theory of AIDS
is totally ignored suggests a covert genocide
program against certain "undesirables" and third
world people. HIV is a cancer-causing virus,
although this is obviously downplayed in an attempt
to separate AIDS from cancer (and its origin from
animal cancer research). HIV is an effective
bioweapon in that it wipes out large numbers of
people due to sexual activity and/or blood
transfusion. It also has spawned a big, big, drug
business based to the tune of $2000-3000 a month for
"effective" (but not curative) treatment against
HIV.
8. What about feline leukemia and
"cat AIDS" The experiments conducted at Harvard by
Myron (Max) Essex on retro viral infections? Did
these experiments have anything to do with it?
* Scientists knew in the few years
before AIDS that retroviruses could cause
immunosuppression and that the feline leukemia virus
was transferable/transmissible between cats
(felines) experimentally confined to confined
quarters. After the epidemic began, Essex became the
leading light (after Robert Gallo) in AIDS research.
I wrote about his experiments and the contamination
of his laboratory with primate viruses in my two
books on the man-made origin of AIDS (AIDS AND THE
DOCTORS OF DEATH, and in QUEER BLOOD: THE SECRET
AIDS GENOCIDE PLOT.
9. Where does Boyd Graves flow Chart
fit into this picture and what does this piece of
information indicate to you?
The "flow chart" is contained in one
of the annual volumes of the Special Cancer Virus
Program, which in Graves' opinion (and in mine)
contains the most damaging evidence connecting
government-sponsored (and biowarfare related)
experimentation in the 1970s to the
not-so-mysterious outbreak of HIV exclusively in
gays in the late 1970s. From these volumes, it is
made clear that human experimentation with these
cancer-causing and immunosuppressive viruses was
necessary. With the "gay plague" and "gay cancer',
such experiments were no longer necessary. The
deaths of thousands of gay men proved with these
viruses caused cancer, immunosuppression, and were
sexually-transmissible between people (similar to
what Essex learned a few year earlier from his cat
retrovirus experiments).
10. Would you say your conclusions
are similar to the findings of Dr Lenord Horrowitz?
I think he said something like that 15,000 gallons
of AIDS was made and do you know if most of this was
injected into Africans during the smallpox
vaccination programs?.
* Yes, there were thousands and
thousands of liters and gallons of cancer-causing
viruses that were manufactured for animal
experimentation in the so-called war on cancer in
the short years before the "introduction" of HIV
into American gay men. For more details, simply
Google: Special Virus Cancer Program. The Program
has been largely (and conveniently) forgotten by
AIDS historians. The annual reports are generally
unavailable. In my view, the Program comprises the
secret history of AIDS, which clearly needs to be
investigated to support the very real possibility
that HIV/AIDS is a man-made disease. For people who
don't believe government scientists would be capable
of initiating such a horrendous world plague, I
suggest they Google: the human radiation
experiments. These experiments administering
radioactive substances to unsuspecting American
citizens and hospitalized patients are proof that
doctors can be as diabolic as the worst hardened
criminals and murderers.
11. I came across this article. "In
February 1999 a group of researchers from the
University of Alabama announced that they had found
a type of SIVcpz that was almost identical to HIV-1.
This particular strain was identified in a frozen
sample taken from a captive member of the sub-group
of chimpanzees known as Pan troglodytes troglodytes
(P. t. troglodytes), which were once common in
west-central Africa.
The researchers (lead by Paul Sharp
of Nottingham University and Beatrice Hahn of the
University of Alabama) made the discovery during the
course of a 10-year long study into the origins of
the virus. They claimed that this sample proved that
chimpanzees were the source of HIV-1, and that the
virus had at some point crossed species from chimps
to humans.
Their final findings were published
two years later in Nature magazine. In this article,
they concluded that wild chimps had been infected
simultaneously with two different simian
immunodeficiency viruses which had "viral sex" to
form a third virus that could be passed on to other
chimps and, more significantly, was capable of
infecting humans and causing AIDS". What are your
thoughts on this theory?
* I am neither a molecular biologist,
nor a virologist. From the very beginning of the
epidemic the government's view was that HIV/AIDS
originated in Africa and that a primate virus
"jumped species" to produce the epidemic. Therefore,
ALL government-sponsored research is an attempt to
PROVE this. However, attempting to prove the
ancestral origin of the AIDS virus is NOT the same
as attempting to discover the origin of the
epidemic. Furthermore, these government scientists
have no interest in studying the viruses that were
transferred between primates and that were ADAPTED
to human tissue as part of the Special Cancer Virus
Program. And, as I mentioned before, the AIDS
epidemic began when TWO previously unknown viruses (
the retrovirus HIV -- and the herpes KS virus ) were
BOTH "introduced" into American gays to produce the
first cases of "acquired" immunodeficiency and "gay
cancer." We know from the previous experience with
monkey-contaminated polio vaccines, which
"introduced" simian-virus 40 into millions of
Americans, that vaccines could be the most likely
way HIV entered the gay and black African
population. Naturally, this concept has been
condemned by the scientific establishment and a
serious discussion of man-made AIDS has always been
TABOO.
12. What about an article published
in The Lancet in 2004, also shows how retroviral
transfer from primates to hunters is still occurring
even today. In a sample of 1099 individuals in
Cameroon , they discovered to ten (1%) were infected
with SFV (Simian Foamy Virus), an illness which,
like SIV, was previously thought only to infect
primates. All these infections were believed to have
been acquired through the butchering and consumption
of monkey and ape meat. Discoveries such as this
have lead to calls for an outright ban on bush meat
hunting to prevent simian viruses being passed to
humans".
* Again I would say that all these
widely heralded virus findings are an attempt to
support the government's claim that HIV originated
in Africa, and to further cast doubt on the man-made
theory of AIDS.
13. What about the argument that it
doesn't matter where it originated because knowing
the truth would only create fear and mayhem and even
more divisiveness between the races and that all
these various theories are not going to solve the
problem anyway and the solution is to just treat
those already effected with it and to continue to
find means of preventing it from spreading etc etc
etec.
*Of course it matters! Does
deliberate genocide of undesirable people matter?
Shouldn't AIDS patients be "victims"
like the Jews who suffered under the Holocaust?
Shouldn't AIDS patients be compensated and given
free anti-HIV drugs, just like the surviving Jews
have received compensation from the German
government. Shouldn't people with AIDS be told that
they are infected with viruses that were
"introduced" by scientists, and not from monkeys in
the jungle. Dr. Strecker used to say he would rather
have his patients FEAR HIV than contract it and die!
I couldn't agree more. Don't people who give up
cigarettes FEAR cancer. I know I did! If all this
upsets people, perhaps it's a good thing. Waking up
to the insanities of the world might help people
live longer and better protect their loved ones as
well. Don't we place proper value on life any more?
Is mankind "progressing" by learning how to create
and deploy better and better biological warfare
weapons? I think not!
14. What about Ebola and some of
these other exotic viruses like flesh eating
viruses? Do you know if there is any associations
between these nasty viruses and experiments at the
laboratories of Fort Detrick etc
* I have no idea what biowarfare
agents are being developed by the military.
All biological warfare programs are
secret and classified.
15. What about a vaccine. Do you
think a vaccine could work or feel the same way
about this as Strecker?
*The vaccine makers are stymied in
developing/devising an anti-HIV vaccine, apparently
because HIV mutates so quickly.
Do
you believe a vaccine was also created at the same
time and was patented by a Rabbi Dr. Marvin Antelman
called Tetrasil. Ag4O4 (Silver 4/Oxygen 4).
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5676977.pdf What
are your thoughts on this vaccine?
* I have no experience with this, but
I have learned when a treatment/drug is "too good to
be true", it usually isn't.
16. What about UV radiation? Do you
know if this works?
* Are you referring to UV radiation
of the blood here? I am not aware of any credible UV
radiation therapy.
17. Do you know if Dr Gallo is still
around and do you know if there has been any
investigations into this by senate sub-committees?
* Gallo is alive and well and still
working. He was the subject of a scientific
investigation back in the 1990s
when he was accused of "stealing" the
AIDS virus from the French at the Pasteur Institute
in Paris. The lawsuit was eventually settled. For
details, read Pulitzer Prize-winning John Crewdson's
book SCIENCE FICTIONS: A SCIENTIFIC MYSTERY, A
MASSIVE COVER-UP, AND THE DARK LEGACY OF ROBERT
GALLO.
18. Who has gained the most from
AIDS? Is it .
A The pharmaceutical companies.
B. Politicians and scientists
C. World Health Organization or
something else
*The drug companies, the AIDS
scientists, the WHO -- all have gained except for
HIV/AIDS patients and their loved ones, and the
taxpayer. Some drug companies have become very rich
with happy stockholders. AIDS is a billion dollar
business, and the big AIDS research money is handed
out exclusively by the Pentagon. Another reason to
suspect a tie of AIDS to military biological warfare
research.
18. Where do the mainstream media
stand on this subject these days. Has anything
changed since the early days and what did you think
of New York Times article a couple of years back on
their origin of aids theory?
* There has never been a serious
discussion of man-made AIDS in the New York Times or
in any other major media outlet, except to refer to
the theory as paranoia and conspiracy theory. As I
said, the man-made theory of AIDS has remained taboo
for more than a quarter-century, and it is likely to
remain in the closet because the true history of
AIDS is so incriminating. But don't look to the AIDS
establishment and medical science to divulge this
secret history anytime soon. If people were to take
the time to educate themselves as to the evidence
for man-made AIDS, it would be a more widely
accepted theory. I have attempted to document this
closeted history in my two books on the man-made
epidemic: AIDS AND THE DOCTORS OF DEATH, and in
QUEER BLOOD, which incidentally won a Benjamin
Franklin Book Award in 1994. These books are
available through Amazon.com and via
www.ariesrisingpress.com and through Book Clearing
House at 1-800-431-1579.
http://heyokamagazine.com/HEYOKA.7.HEALTH.AlanCantwell.MD.htm
Alan Cantwell M.D.
alancantwell@sbcglobal.net
http://www.ariesrisingpress.com
FOUR WOMEN AGAINST CANCER:
Bacteria, Cancer and the Origin of
Life |
