|
Introduction
There are few subjects as explosive inside the
Christian church as sexuality. The level of
reactivity with which people discuss sexuality,
parent around sexuality, silence sexuality, and
judge and shame sexuality has no equal. For
centuries we have fostered this reactivity through
the silence and shame that fills most adult’s sexual
story and later as parents, assuming a mostly “off
limits” silencing stance in our homes with our
children. When sexuality is brought up there is
usually a swift, reactive and authoritarian response
that sounds something like, “Don’t do that!” That is
“wrong” or “bad” or “only for people who are
married.” And then perpetuating the cycle, we assist
our children in going underground with their
sexuality, filling with a shame, guilt and
self-loathing that finds no place to be comforted.
The cycle of shame, silence, and separation of
sexuality from faith, grace, and God’s relentless
and embodied love is continued. Why have we allowed
this? Why have we not examined this with less
reactivity and more earnestness? Where is Christ’s
love and grace in our sexual stories, our parenting,
or the stories of our children?
After over ten years of teaching a graduate level
human sexuality course at a Christian university and
reading well over 300 sexual autobiographies, I am
fascinated by why we as a Christian church, as
parents, as sexual people, don’t challenge this
view? More than 80% of the autobiographies I have
read have told the same basic story.
The general
story regarding the family they grew up in:
‘My parents never talked about sex and if they did
it was to give me a book and tell me to ask
questions, which of course there was ‘no way’ I
would do. I remember being yelled at when they
caught me playing doctor when I was 6 and I felt
horrible, though I was not sure what I had done. I
only knew it was really bad! I was also told that I
was not to have sex until I was married and that
masturbation was wrong.’ Girls from more
conservative homes where told that they were to keep
themselves ‘pure and protected.’ They were not to
even kiss a boy because it might “get the boy
going.” Many were told that if they did not save
themselves for marriage they would be bringing a
‘used person’ to the relationship and their sexual
relationship with their husband/wife would never be
what it could be. The dominant message is,
“The word “sex” was
not spoken, nor was any remotely related topic
discussed. In other words, silence about sexuality
in my family meant it was shameful, scary, hurtful
or controversial.” 32 year-old.
The general (hidden) personal story regarding sexual
development is:
I participated in age appropriate sexual play as a
child (doctor), older child (often girls pretending
to be married and laying on top of each other and/or
kissing), pre-adolescents with masturbation,
adolescence with romantic connections involving
kissing, touching, and later adolescence or early
adulthood progressing to genital intercourse within
a loving relationship prior to marriage. And then I
read either, “I felt overwhelming shame and guilt
for my sexual desires and sexual experiences and
still to this day I feel guilt even though I am
married.” Or “I decided I was not going to feel
guilty and ashamed because my relationship with my
boyfriend/girlfriend was wonderful, safe, loving and
tender. Sometimes I feel guilty for not feeling
guilty.” The dominant message is,
“For so long I’ve
associated sex with negativity, but it did not
necessarily need to be that way. The narrow-minded
view of religion from my growing up has prevented me
from incorporating spirituality into sexuality. I
have always viewed them as two different entities.”
35 year-old.
If these samples represent the majority experience
of educated adults from loving Christian homes (and
many non-Christian middle and upper middle class
homes),1 then why are we not boldly
challenging the origins of the discourse that sex,
sexuality, and desire are dangerous, carnal, and
separate us from God?
Many people may be unaware that scholars of early
church history note a significant shift in doctrinal
thought in the 4th century. Prior to this
time, free will given by God was a central
theological principal. But during this time a
notable shift began to occur in both church
leadership and the cultural and political climate.
Augustine, a church leader, proposed that all
sexuality, all sensual pleasure, involved the
triumph of the carnal will. Since sin was located in
the carnal will and not the act, Augustine developed
a rigorous puritanical attitude towards sexuality
that would orient the Christian church until the
present day.2,3
If these rigid ideas of sexuality are informed more
by particular religious and political events than by
the gospel of Christ, why do we perpetuate it? And
when we do, what is the cost we pay? If we were to
define a revised Christian sexual ethic, which in
part returned us to a spiritually integrated
covenant approach to sexual understanding and
education, what would we be teaching and modeling
instead?
When we continue to shroud sexuality in silence and
an abstinence only discourse, we continue to burden
faith filled children, adolescents, young adults and
adults with a deep shame that interrupts their
ability to fully know God’s love and grace. Shame
modulates distance in intimacy and sexual expression
in the monogamous relationships that are
foundational to community living and a significant
expression of God’s active love. When people are
filled with shame and self-loathing, their affected
self-esteem takes precedence in interactions with
others. It dominates and eclipses a person’s ability
to see and love another. In essence, sexuality
encased in silence and shame keeps people from
intimately knowing both God and each other, and
cripples our ability as a community of believers to
truly love and be a healing force in our hurting
world.
Unveiling Sexual Shame
Throughout popular Christian literature now and for
sixteen hundred years, Christians have dismembered
themselves from their sexuality, their hearts,
minds, bodies, eroticism, and their faith. Beginning
in the 4th century free will and an appreciation for
God’s creation in the body was exchanged for the
notion of the body and its desires as sin. David
Schnarch in his book
Constructing the
Sexual Crucible says,
“The sex affirming Hebraic roots of Western
civilization has been masked by Augustine’s legacy
of eroticism-hating sexual dualism, perpetuated by
authoritarian-rooted Christian dogma, which negated
the basic worthiness of human beings. The evolution
of Western culture is a history of theologically
based sexual oppression.”5
While the culture touts the objectification of
the body and uses it in whole and part to fuel its
consumer driven economy, Christians support a
message about abstinence that dismembers intercourse
from sexuality, intimacy, faith and relationships.
We are in crisis over sexuality in our culture in
part because the church has been largely unable to
step away from the old Christian ethic and develop a
responsible sexual ethic that is based on both what
we have come to learn from science and experience,
with the revelations of the Gospel.6
Christine Gudorf in her book, Body, Sex and
Pleasure highlights this when she states,
“Traditional Christian sexual ethics is not only
inadequate in that it fails to reflect God’s reign
of justice and love which Jesus died announcing, but
its legalistic, apologetic approach is also
incompatible with central Judaic and Christian
affirmations of creation, life, and an incarnate
messiah. Because the Christian sexual tradition has
diverged from this its life-affirming source, it has
become responsible for innumerable deaths, the
stunting of souls, the destruction of relationships,
and the distortion of human communities. The
Christian sexual tradition uses scripture and
theological traditions as supports for a code of
behavior which developed out of mistaken,
pre-scientific understanding of man, anatomy,
physiology and reproduction, as well as out of now
abandoned and discredited models of the human person
and human relationships.”7
What We Learn by Listening
While earning a graduate degree in Family Therapy,
students are required to take a course in Human
Sexuality, which explores the interface of sexuality
with family and relational health. Because
therapists will walk with clients and families in
places of extreme vulnerability, it is important
that they clearly understand their particular
issues, experiences, values and beliefs. For this
reason all students in our program are given the
assignment to write their sexual autobiography
through the lens of their family of origin, gender
and faith. Questions are given to guide them through
each developmental stage to the present. The vast
majority of autobiographies reveal that these adults
grew up in either a sexually evasive or sexually
negative home. Well meaning parents, seeped in an
unwitting hurtful sexual ethic, believed they were
training up their children by protecting them from
learning about sexuality or worse telling their
child that sex was bad, inappropriate, harmful, a
sign of faithlessness, or something to be avoided.
Instead of providing a continual developmentally
appropriate education about the nature and purposes
of sexuality, this was exchanged for an abstinence
only message sounding something like, “God wants you
to have a wonderful and blessed sexual relationship
with your spouse someday and because of that it is
important that you keep yourself pure and a virgin
until then.” It is as if the embedded message is
‘abstaining from intercourse and anything that might
lead you to desire this, will guarantee an intimate,
trusting, faith-filled, erotic, safe, healthy,
dynamic, sexual partnership during your marriage.’
But in fact this is not the case. And unfortunately,
most Christians know, deny, and repeat this. Nowhere
in this absolute premarital chastity discourse is
the message that sex can be healing and joyful
(sometimes outside and sometimes inside of
marriage), that it can lead to growth, a deeper more
intimate relationship with God, and above all is
created good, on
purpose, as a gift, and for your pleasure and
communion.8
Normal developmental desires for sexual touch,
arousal, orgasm and intimacy were relegated to ‘sin’
– a place far from the God these youth loved. In
fact many were taught that it was ‘this kind’ of
sinful desire that separated them from God and kept
them from knowing God’s love and blessing. Any
attempts to gain or understand sexuality was blocked
or punished. In these homes we often hear that
exploring one’s body was totally forbidden and they
were punished when they 'were caught.' Gudorf says,
“In truth, sex-avoidant families truncate their
children’s ability to feel comfortable with
sexuality as adults. Sex therapists find their
offices filled with people who have been socialized
not to even think about sex, therefore are unable to
explore enough to know what they like sexually.”9
Shame has a profound affect on people’s sense of
themselves and thus on their ability to receive and
accept God’s love. This affect touches every aspect
of their lives and most centrally their most
intimate and personal relationships.10 In
2005, the Journal of Counseling Psychology published
an article on shame stating, “Many theorists
consider shame to be an experience or attribution
about the self as a whole; specifically, an intense
negative affect about the self in its entirety.
Shame theorists suggest that this emotion is likely
to be promoted by a parenting style or family system
that reflects a negative attitude to the child,
consistently points out the failure of the child in
other’s eyes (implicitly or explicitly) and
activates attributions about the whole self. An
authoritarian parenting style appears to be
associated with such a negative orientation. As
defined by one researcher, authoritarian parents are
demanding and directive, place a high value on
obedience and conformity and are unresponsive and
even outright rejecting when the child fails to meet
their expectations. They provide an orderly
environment and a clear set of rules and
regulations, and monitor their child closely, but
they expect unquestioning obedience and will use
force and punishment if they do not get it. In
short, the child is held to high standards and
expectations, given little control and autonomy, and
punished for failure. These harsh and punitive
attitudes may lay the foundation for global negative
self-attribution and shame.”11
"Any sexual experience I had as a child produced
guilt and fear, especially sex play behavior. For a
long time I thought something as wrong with me
because of this. Because of these feelings,
discussing sexuality became difficult for me. I felt
like sexuality was 'dirty.' I think these
experiences contributed to my feeling like sexuality
and becoming a woman was shameful; that my parents
did not accept that part of me.”
29 year-old.
"What I learned
from their avoidance of the topic was that sexuality
was a taboo topic, that it was not a natural part of
being human. I learned it was embarrassing and
shameful.” 24 year-old.
A
recent article published in the Christian journal
New Man
(June 2006) on talking to boys about masturbation,
revealed the prevalence of this hurtful and guilt
filled message, “So if he (the boy) is willing to
keep himself for his future spouse and focus his
sexual fantasies on marriage, God will give him
grace and
forgiveness (italics added) for
pleasuring himself as often as is necessary until he
is married.” Though the message in this article is
covert, it is deafeningly clear and hurtful,
masturbation is sinful – in need of forgiveness and
grace. When a child grows up in a family seeped in a
sexually avoidant and negative atmosphere and is
unable to free themselves through reading, peer
experiences or talking to other adults, they will
not develop a sense that sexuality is normal,
pleasurable and God blessed. Sex therapist and
expert, David Schnarch echoes this when he suggests,
“Silence suggests that eroticism is dirty,
inherently embarrassing, dangerous, inappropriate,
or vulgar; silence is an education in sexual
attitudes and gender roles. Like it or not, the
family is always the predominant purveyor of the
child’s erotic map and attitudes toward eroticism.”12
Far too many learn to associate sexual feelings,
desires, and action with shame and aversive
consequences. This remains well into adulthood
manifesting itself both in the bedroom and in
parenting.
"My husband and I both came from good Christian
homes and were virgins when we married at 23 years
old. Both of our families didn’t talk about sexual
matters. For most of the first 24 years of our
marriage I had low sexual desire and my husband was
the constant initiator. It set up a bad dynamic
between us. All I knew was what I ‘should’ do and
nothing about what I really wanted as a wife or a
sexual person. This pattern finally began to change
as our kids grew older and I began to work on my own
reactivity and lack of autonomy. This helped
tremendously in my ability to exercise more freedom
within our sexual relationship. I found that the
more I grew sexually the more intriguing our
relationship became. I am just now discovering how
sexuality is linked to spirituality in my life. My
husband has helped me to feel free to experiment and
find new ways to be intimate with him.”
53 year-old.
"When I look back, I do not feel regret for any of
my sexual development. I would not change any of the
decisions I made, because I think I made good
decisions that were congruent with where I was in
that part of my life. What I do feel sad about is
how I felt about myself throughout my adolescence. I
lived under the umbrella of thinking that I was not
normal, that nobody else felt or acted the way I
did. How much I would love to be able to go back in
time and comfort my teenage self."
28 year-old.
We have also long known both personally and
statistically that when forbidding sexual expression
is the only
sex education a child/adolescent/young adult
receives, this does not lower the incidence of
sexual involvement. The U.S. has one of the highest
incidences of teenage pregnancy, STD’s and early
onset sexual activity of any industrialized country.
In fact there are studies to show that
abstinence-only education has been known to increase
the incidence of sexual intercourse in adolescents.13
What does forbidding sexual expression or
abstinence-only education do? Without an
understanding of a God created normal sexual
development, open communication, grace filled
answers and direction, adolescents will go
underground, feeling shame and self loathing each
and every time they desire or act on sexual longing.
This shame and silence places adolescents and young
adults at risk of entering an addiction cycle with
their sexuality. The child who masturbates when they
have been told that it is wrong or worse are told
that God does not approve, feels shame, vows to
stop, obsesses on their thoughts and desires both to
masturbate and to stop, acts again, feels even more
self loathing… and the cycle continues carving a
deep grove into the psyche, sexuality and faith of
this person. The damage this does to a person’s
ability to understand God’s love for them, to accept
God’s grace and forgiveness, feel love, give love,
or have a healthy sexual relationship, even inside
the context of a committed partnership, is
significant. I believe much of what we see in sexual
perversion inside and outside the Christian church;
use of pornography, multiple affairs, sexual abuse,
sexual offending, etc. can be linked to this
silence, secrecy, and shame cycle and discourse.
Thomas Moore in an article on sexuality states, “Our
culture segregates sexuality. We try to cut it out
of every other part of life, thus ignoring the fact
that it has an impact on all parts of life. By
trying to ignore this part of ourselves, it starts
forcing itself in unexpected and undesirable ways,
such as pornography, illicit affairs, prostitution,
etc.”14
"I was left to explore sexuality on my own terms and
this searching continued when I started to
masturbate at age 12. Although I did not want my
parents to find out, I did not feel guilty about
doing it. I did not think that there was anything
wrong or immoral about it until I was in high school
and someone at my church said that masturbation was
a sin. I then started to experience an intense
amount of guilt about masturbating but did not quit.
I felt bad about myself for not having the
self-control to stop. I thought I was weird; that
other girls and Christians did not masturbate. I
denied doing it and would have been extremely
ashamed if anyone found out that I did.”
33 year-old.
Does it make any sense that when a child’s curiosity
about the body begins as a toddler and desire to
understand and relieve one’s sexual arousal cycle
peaks in early teens, that we give children no
paradigm or open conversation to understand the gift
and desire of sexuality and the workings of the
body?
The Cry For a Revised Christian Sexual Ethic
Children and later, adolescents, need verbal and
behavioral guidance on how to honor self, God and
their desires for sexual and emotional intimacy,
while
developing the maturity to sustain a committed
loving relationship. The human body develops now
similarly to how it always has. This means that
parents need to become skilled at discussing in
developmentally appropriate ways the unfolding of
sexuality along the child and adolescent lifecycle.
If this and coming generations in response to
culture’s increasing complexity, wait to marry until
well into their late 20’s or early 30’s, then a
paradigm for developing sexual expression, a new
Christian sexual ethic, will need to emerge. One
that sees desire and pleasure as gifts from God and
to be used to honor God, others, and ourselves.
Thomas Hart, clergy, spiritual director,
psychotherapist and author says, “Sexuality is
diaphanous; the light of God shines through it. This
intimate link with the Divine is the secret of its
immense power over us. Wherever we experience that
kind of power, we should suspect recognition has
gone almost entirely unacknowledged, certainly
uncelebrated, in church reading.”15 Over
80% of the sexual autobiographies I have read over
the last 10 years told of sexual development
involving normative developmental desires and
experiences in sexual touch, arousal, orgasm and
intimacy independent of the cultural or religious
discourse surrounding them. The difference was not
so much in what they did, but how they felt about
themselves, their God, and the other. When their
sexual story involved sexual touch or sexual
intercourse prior to marriage it often produced a
confusing dichotomy of meaning. On one hand was a
tender gratefulness for the experience of loving
touch inside a devoted relationship, and on the
other hand, shame and self-loathing – a place that
felt far from the God they loved. In fact many were
taught that sexual desire and expression would keep
them from knowing God’s love and blessing.
"I struggled with religious intolerance of
premarital sex. I believe it is an unrealistic
standard that utilized guilt to ensure abstinence.
At 20 I became very disconnected from my parents
because I did not feel comfortable talking to them
about my relationship or sex. My junior year I began
dating this really nice guy that I had gone to high
school with. By the time we had been dating six
months I felt ready to sleep with him. I would not
change losing my virginity with this person because
I know that we cared for one another and it felt
mutually loving and respectful."
27 year-old.
"It was not until my late teenage years in my first
real relationship that I started to enjoy sexual
behaviors. I felt like I was compromising my
Christian values and struggled with the question of
what purity really was. I lived through the guilt by
distancing myself from my faith. I thought how could
I be a Christian if I enjoy being sexual with this
man before marriage. Nobody had ever told me how to
integrate my sexuality and spirituality. All I heard
was 'Do not engage in premarital sex!'”
30 year-old.
Any revised Christian sexual ethic, like in other
arenas of ethics, must first begin with a
description of the lived reality of people and
communities. It must also consider what we know in
the physical and social sciences. Then we must
subject this to a theological reflection regarding
the meaning and significance of the various factual
elements.
Where Do We Begin – Hard, yet Telling Questions
So what are the questions we are failing to ask and
why are we failing to ask them? Here is a set of
questions. They are not
the questions
but rather a portion of a discourse of questions
integrating sexuality and a deep Christian faith.
1. What messages did I get as a child that helped me
integrate my sexuality with God’s love?
2. What messages did I get growing up that helped me
see God’s love in my body, its senses and responses,
and my developing sexuality?
3. How was I encouraged to cherish and know my body
and sexuality?
4. What behaviors and messages helped me develop
this?
5. Who taught me about my body, my sexuality, sexual
health, and God’s intention for us to experience His
pleasure and love in and through our bodies, our
senses and our developing sexuality at each stage
along the way?
6. How did I learn to marvel at my arousal cycle, an
orgasm, and God’s love woven through?
7. How does God express His love through my
sexuality and how have I learned to cultivate that
through my life. How did my parents help me to do
this? How did the messages in and from my church
community help me do this?
8. Re-ask yourself questions 1 – 7 adding what you
would have wanted if you did not receive the
messages needed to develop a sacred and integrated
sexuality.
9. What helps me now and what has helped me along my
life to understand the beauty and gift of my body?
10. How do I open myself to an integration of faith,
gratefulness, joy, pleasure, God, eroticism, my
body, and my partner (if/when I have one)?
11. What kind of sexually and spiritually integrated
partnership would we most want and most hope for our
children?
12. In light of our own experiences, hopes, desires
and hard earned wisdom, how do we help children
understand the gift of their body and their
developing sexuality at each developmental stage?
Why Have We Failed to Ask Ourselves These Questions
that Align With the New Covenant?
Could it be that if we ask these questions we
(partnered adult Christians) will have to answer to
the pain and isolation in our own sexuality and
sexual partnership? Will we have to confront how we
continue to keep our sexual desires separated from
God and our deepest faith? Or how we keep our
deepest faith from our partner? If we as a church
were to embrace these questions and others like
them, how might it change the way we raise our
children and invite them into the redeeming gift of
God’s love with respect to their sexuality? Would we
have to confront the effects and earthly cultural
origins of the puritanical discourse espousing the
‘dangers’ of the flesh? How the religious and
historical context had eclipsed our ability to hear
Christ’s redeeming message of love and grace as it
related to our bodies and our sexuality? Would we
have to face how we were hurt by the shame and
silence of this message during our developing years?
How that pain still lives on in our lives? How our
self-condemnation is still present in how we think
about our bodies and ourselves sexually? Would we
have to face how we have dutifully passed this
shame, silence, and self-condemnation on to our
adult children who now struggle to create a sacred
relationship with their bodies, sexuality, faith and
partner? Could we face the pain that has been
unwittingly passed on by our hands?
When we spend time exploring these types of
questions, we expose ourselves to the wisdom gained
from our life. Wisdom held in our hearts and shaped
through an integration of our faith, relationships
and lived experience. We all too often do not access
this wisdom and instead only privilege information
generated outside of us, told to us, preached to us.
When we honestly examine the knowledge gained from
our experience, we do so knowing the full context of
our time and culture. This gives us an opportunity
to know something inside the context of the when,
where, and how of the series of experiences. All too
often when we absorb information outside of us,
preached to us in churches, media, from others, we
fail to know the context of that information or
‘truth.’ The teller speaks the truth for God,
scripture, or as an expert. Understanding historical
context, culture, norms and expectations gives a
framework for understanding the information as it
was meant to be understood, yet gaining this
contextual information is often time consuming and
unrealistic. This is why it is critical that people
resource the knowledge and wisdom of
their
lived experience. Draw on this, examine this and
hold it up next
to the current Christian cultural
discourse being espoused. This is a valuable
untapped resource.
Wisdom From Sexual Autobiographies – What Makes a
Difference?
Sifting through sexual autobiographies over the last
several years has highlighted two primary repeating
themes fostering a life of celebrated and integrated
sexuality. I believe these themes will be fostered
in a new Christian sexual ethic, and I believe this
will heal many wounds and relieve a great deal of
silent suffering:
1. Being raised in a home that does not shame the
body, the desire to enjoy the body, or developing
sexual desire.
2. A home that gives a context for this desire
wrapped in God’s deep love and intention. This will
be housed in an ongoing open age appropriate
conversation that helps a child at every
developmental stage develop ways to celebrate their
bodies and senses, and act in ways that include
God’s love and produce gratefulness. And as they
enter adolescence, helps them define and author a
story of their unfolding sexuality that feels
honoring to them - their values and goals, an other,
and their God, while they look forward to sharing
this within a committed partnership.
“My brothers and sisters and I have all struggled
through the wall of silence to find sexuality to be
a joyful thing. I am pleased we had the strength to
persist, believing that sex had to be something
better than what our parents suggested.”
42 year-old.
“I am encouraged to stop the legacy of sexuality
being silenced, shamed and seen negatively when I
have my own family. I want to openly discuss topics
of sexuality with my children and not shame them for
their experiences. My hope is to embrace sexuality
as a normal and wonderful part of being human so
that my children can feel that I love all parts of
them, even their eroticism, and they can learn to
love and respect all parts of themselves too.”
27 year-old.
Building an intimate, sexual, sacred, trusting,
loving, strong and spiritually integrated
partnership takes depth of skills, character, faith,
courage, integrity,
and practice.
And most achieve only a small portion of the extent
of relationship possible. In fact those who have
long struggled to create such a spiritually
integrated and trusting sexual relationship have
done so without the help and support of popular
Christian literature or the church. Far too many
have had to unravel years of deeply woven emotional
and physical shame (beliefs and responses) from
their years of silence and self-degradation in
childhood through young adulthood.
Spiritually Integrated Sexuality – The Vision
A
deep faith and a heart filled with gratefulness
often produce a spiritual person deeply interested
in the contemplative dimension and mystery of
sexuality. I see this in my students as they spend
time in their sexual development stories and as they
increase in wisdom, intention and attention to the
integration of sexuality and spirituality in their
lives now and as they craft their future. I see an
increase in their concern for the quality of human
relationships, and an increase alignment with this
aspect of Christ’s ministry – that the central role
of all relating is genuine love. It is this lens
that calls out all abuses of power and all
self-gratification without regard for the well being
of the other. They can see this in and out of
marriages, with and without sexual expression, in
the withholding passive stance, as well as the
aggressive or manipulative stance. They can begin to
call forth in themselves and in the people they
serve, a clearer application to sexual relating
involving both authenticity and responsibility.16
If we are to act in a way that is shrouded in God’s
grace and love, then we need to commit to being
honest, in and out of our sexual relating. And we
must be responsible and genuinely concerned for the
welfare of ourselves, our partners, and any life
that may result from a sexual relationship. Being
responsible and authentic will help to eclipse most
sexual concerns and abuses: exploitation, STD’s,
careless sex, and unplanned pregnancy. All of these
hurt our selves, others, and violate our call to
love.
1David
Schnarch discusses this in detail in
Constructing the
Sexual Crucible. 1991. WW Norton & Co.,
New York. Pg 316-318.
2Though later in life Augustine converted
to a Christian faith, Augustine at the age of 29
years in 373 joined a sect called the Manicheans.
Manicheism attracted Augustine because it taught the
harsh but strangely comforting doctrine that sex was
synonymous with darkness and bore the marks of the
evil creator.
http://www.augnet.org/default.asp
3Throughout the
Confessions,
Augustine uses harsh language to describe his sexual
impulses reflecting images of disease, disorder, and
corruption. Desire is almost a compulsion, an
irrational impulse that he feels incapable of
controlling without God’s help, a bondage that he is
too weak to escape. Desire becomes an overbearing
obstacle between Augustine and a complete commitment
to God, because he is certain he cannot live a
celibate life.
4Pagels, E.
Adam, Eve and the
Serpent. 1988. First Vintage Books, New
York.
5Schnarch, D.
Constructing the
Sexual Crucible. 1991. WW Norton & Co.,
New York. Pg Pg. 548.
6Gudorf, C.
Body, Sex and
Pleasure – Reconstructing Christian Sexual Ethics.
1994. Pilgrim Press, Ohio.
7Ibid
8Furlong, M.
Sexuality and the
Sacred – Sources for Theological Reflection.
Ed. Nelson, J., Longfellow, S.
9Zoldbrod, A.
Sex Smart – How
Your Childhood Shaped Your Sexual Life and What To
Do About It. 2005. Page Free Publishing,
MI.
10Journal
of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing,
2006.
11Mills, R.
Journal of
Counseling Psychology. 2005
12See Schnarch, D. 1991.
13Francoeur, R., Taverner, W.
Taking Sides –
Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Human
Sexuality. 7th Edition. 2000. Dushkin/
McGraw-Hill Publisher.
14For a more complete version of this
work see: Moore, T.
The Soul of Sex –
Cultivating Life as an Act of Love.
1998. Harper-Collins, New York.
15Hart, T.
Spiritual Quest – A
Guide to the Changing Landscape. 1999.
Paulist Press, New Jersey.
16Ibid. |