The Private Sector and HIV/AIDS
www.norad.no/default.asp?FILE=items/2837/116
Guidelines on Issues and Responses
1. When and
Why Should This Guideline Be Used?
In HIV/AIDS affected
countries the epidemic will have potentially serious
implications for the private sector.
In order to avoid
negative effects, a number of questions need to be raised during
preparation, monitoring and evaluation of development
co-operation projects within the
private
sector. The
checklist is not a blueprint, it should be adapted to each
particular setting and used selectively. Local knowledge and
experience should inform the selection of questions. The answers
to the questions should help the programme officer
to:
·
analyse how HIV/AIDS affects development cooperation involving
the private sector.
·
identify possible responses that can be integrated into ongoing
and planned interventions.
Raising the questions is also a means to enhance awareness of
HIV/AIDS among counterparts
2. Strategic
Framework
Sida’s strategy on
HIV/AIDS (Investing for Future Generations), identifies
four strategic goals. These goals provide a useful framework.
When analysing interrelations between the private sector and the
HIV/AIDS epidemic, programme officers should be aware of the
gender and equity dimensions. It is important that international
experiences and best practices of private sector involvement in
HIV/AIDS related activities are propagated, and that
co-operation and exchanges between private sector organisations
in different countries in this field is encouraged.
Addressing immediate causes
|
Addressing immediate effects
|
|
Prevention of HIV/AIDS:
·
HIV/AIDS information (staff & clients)
·
Provision of condoms (staff)
·
Control of STDs
|
|
Addressing underlying causes
|
Addressing long-term effects
|
|
Limit
worker separation from family:
|
|
3. Interrelations
between HIV/AIDS and the Infrastructure Sector
The main problem
is the loss of labour force due to AIDS, particularly the loss
of highly trained and experienced staff, affecting costs and
productivity. Other more indirect effects include falling
demand, negative business climate, falling international
investments and tourism. The private sector may also be
seriously affected by the negative impact of HIV/AIDS on
government finance and on the performance of public services and
administration. All planning, implementation and monitoring of
development cooperation related to the private sector in
affected countries and regions therefore have to consider how
they may prevent HIV/AIDS, and deal with its effects.
4. Issues of
Concern and Possible Responses
The following
lists of questions focus on different HIV/AIDS related issues
and indicate possible response alternatives.
Situation and
Policy
It is necessary to
have a general picture of the HIV/AIDS situation in the country
or region. It is also important to find out the views of
counterparts and other private sector organisations concerning
the state of the epidemic and the existence of HIV/AIDS-related
policies in this field.
|
·
What is known about the HIV/AIDS situation in the
country or region (adult HIV prevalence and for
different groups, AIDS mortality etc) and how is it
likely to unfold?
·
Is HIV/AIDS perceived as a problem by private sector
institutions? In what way?
·
Is there an open discussion and concern about HIV/AIDS
within national private sector organisations? What can
be done to further encourage this discussion?
·
Do counterparts or other private sector institutions
have policies and/or strategies on HIV/AIDS issues?
Regarding staff? Regarding customers? Regarding
suppliers? Regarding the general community? |
Awareness and Prevention
Private sector
activities may be compromised by high rates of HIV/AIDS.
Information is needed on how staff, customers, suppliers, and
the surrounding community can avoid HIV-infection and gain
access to practical prevention measures, such as condoms.
Private institutions may need to consider the inclusion of HIV
prevention components in their programmes, or liase with
existing services and programmes. Co-operating Swedish private
sector organisations and individual businesses will need to
raise their level of awareness.
|
·
What is the level of HIV/AIDS awareness in the country
or region and in different groups (e.g. general
population, youth, in firms of different sizes, private
sector organisations, unions)?
·
How can private sector institutions contribute towards
awareness raising at a reasonable cost?
·
Are HIV/AIDS components integrated in private sector
organisation competence development programmes and other
regular staff training? How can such activities be
encouraged?
·
What is done or can be done regarding HIV/AIDS through
national private sector organisations?
·
How can the outreach channels and experiences of private
sector institutions be used for HIV/AIDS information and
education? How can such activities be encouraged?
·
Are there any HIV/AIDS related activities (projects,
information campaigns etc) at national or regional level
that private sector institutions could link up with? How
can such co-operation be encouraged?
·
What are the obstacles for private sector organisations
to introduce HIV/AIDS prevention activities targeting
staff, member firms, customers, suppliers and the
general community?
·
Do private sector organisations co-operative with unions
on HIV/AIDS related issues? How can such co-operation be
encouraged?
·
Have counterpart organisations formed partnerships with
HIV/AIDS organisations regarding HIV/AIDS information or
prevention activities? How can such partnerships be
encouraged?
·
What is the level of HIV/AIDS awareness in co-operating
Swedish private sector organisation and individual
firms? How can they be encouraged to obtain relevant
information? |
Discrimination
Discrimination and
stigma are among the nastier effects of the HIV/AIDS epidemic,
which may also effect the work atmosphere and productivity. In
severely affected areas, private institutions may therefore need
to take action to counteract discrimination within the
workplace.
|
·
Do private sector organisations sensitise management and
staff to countereffect stigma and discrimination related
to HIV/AIDS within the workplace? Can these activities
be encouraged?
·
Do private sector organisations encourage and support
that HIV+ employees continue working?
·
Do private-sector organisations in severely affected
areas hire HIV+ persons with suitable skills? If not,
what are the obstacles? |
When staff or their family members fall ill and die in AIDS the
costs for private sector institutions will increase and
productivity fall as a result of increased absenteeism, loss of
experienced staff, and additional costs (e.g. for medical care,
burials, and support to dependants, recruitment and training of
new staff)
|
·
Have counterpart organisations analysed vulnerability of
their production due to AIDS, such as sickness and loss
of staff at different levels?
·
Have counterpart organisations assessed the costs
related to sickness and death of staff in AIDS?
·
Are counterpart organisations aware of institutional or
organisational auditing as a tool to analyse
vulnerability to AIDS, and are these services available?
If not, can they be facilitated through support to
training programmes?
·
Have private sector organisations introduced responses
to the HIV/AIDS epidemic such as e.g. budget
contingencies to cover extra costs, training of extra
staff; multi-skilling; task-sharing; reduction of
hierarchical constraints to team work; decentralisation
of decision making; reduction or other changes of
contractual pension, sickness and other benefits.
·
Does the private sector co-operate with the public
sector to meet the increased demand for trained
personnel? How can such co-operation be encouraged? |
|
·
Have private sector institutions assessed the impact of
AIDS on their customers?
·
Have private sector institutions detected changing
demand for some kinds of goods and services that can be
attributed to AIDS? Which sectors are most affected?
What responses have been introduced? Have they been
evaluated?
|
Continue to Part
2 |