|
"Meeting or Equaling the Listings of Impairments
Essentially there are two ways to prove disability in Social Security
claims. The first requires medical proof that meets specific medical
standards contained in Social Security's Regulations. These standards
are known as the "Listings of Impairments." If medical
proof meets or equals the appropriate standard the Claimant may
be presumed disabled and benefits awarded, as long as the non-disability
requirements of the law are also met.
The Listing for liver diseases is fairly complex and specific.
There is no specific Listing for Hepatitis C. The Listing used by
SSA for person with liver disease is found at Section 5.05 of the
Listings of Impairments:
5.05 (Chronic liver disease (e.g., portal, postnecrotic, or biliary
cirrhosis; chronic active hepatitis; Wilson's disease). With:
A. Esophageal varices (demonstrated by X-ray or endoscopy) with
a documented history of massive hemorrhage attributable to these
varices. Consider under a disability for 3 years following the last
massive hemorrhage; thereafter, evaluate the residual impairment;
or
B. Performance of a shunt operation for esophageal varices. Consider
under a disability for 3 years following surgery; thereafter, evaluate
the residual impairment; or
C. Serum bulirubin of 2.5 mg. per deciliter (100 ml.) or greater
persisting on repeated examinations for at least 5 months; or
D. Ascites, not attributable to other causes, recurrent or persisting
for at least 5 months, demonstrated by abdominal paracentesis or
associated with persistent hypoalbumnemia of 30 gml per deciliter
(100 ml.) or less; or
E. Hepatic encephalopathy. Evaluated under the criteria in listing
12.02; or
F. Confirmation of chronic liver disease by liver biopsy (obtained
independent of social security disability evaluation) and one of
the following:
-Ascites not attributable to other causes, recurrent or persisting
for at least 3 months, demonstrated by abdominal paracentesis or
associated with persistent hypoalbuminemia of 3.0 gm. per deciliter
(100 ml.) or less; or
-Serum bilirubin of 2.5 mg. per deciliter (100 ml.) or greater
on repeated examinations for at least 3 months; or
-Hepatic cell necrosis or inflammation persisting for at least
3 months, documented by repeated abnormalities of prothrombin time
and enzymes indicative of hepatic dysfunction.
Even a cursory review of the Listing makes it obvious that this
is a medical standard that will not be met by the medical evidence
in most claims. The Listings are intended to be a difficult standard.
Liver transplant claims will likely be analogized to the Listing
for kidney and heart transplants. Those Listings presume disability
for one year from the transplant. After that, SSA will conduct a
review to determine whether the organ is functioning and whether
the Claimant remains disabled. A Claimant with liver disease should
provide a copy of this Listing to the treating physician to obtain
a medical opinion as to whether this standard has been satisfied."
Obtaining Social Security Benefits for Patients with Liver Disease.
ADDITIONAL ARTICLES:
|
Document Name & Link to Document
|
Description
|
File Size /Type**
|
|
2006 VA HEALTH, INCOME AND OTHER BENEFITS |
Many fans of movie musicals can recall Joan
Blondell belting out “Remember My Forgotten Man” against a
moving tableau of World War I doughboys in Busby Berkeley’s
film, Golddiggers of 1933. In one of Hollywood’s
rare early forays into social issues, the song and dance
number called for better treatment of the World War I
veterans who’d just been spurned by President Hoover, the
lame-duck GOP Congress and even future World War II hero
General Douglas MacArthur, who used tanks to disperse
thousands of unemployed and disabled veterans demonstrating
peacefully for benefits in Washington the year before.
But over 70 years later, Blondell’s
torch-song lament still rings true: Most of us aren’t aware
of benefits which are available to all veterans – and
especially disabled veterans -- and they and the benefits
due them too often remain “forgotten.” (For just one
example, in 2000 Lawrence Deyton, MD, the VA’s national
coordinator of HIV care, estimated that only 18,000 of an
estimated 85,000 to 130,000 eligible HIV-positive veterans
had signed up for the VA health care to which they’re
entitled.) Here’s a brief survey of income and health
coverage programs for veterans of active duty with general
or honorable discharges. |
|
|
2007-Coverage
through the “Doughnut Hole” |
Unlike
most forms of insurance, the Medicare Part D prescription
drug program has a hole in its middle. This coverage gap,
colloquially known as the “doughnut hole,” is perhaps the
most bizarre and troublesome aspect of the Part D drug
program. After beneficiaries reach their initial limit of
total drug expenses ($2,250 in 2006), they have no
prescription drug coverage until their total drug expenses
reach a catastrophic threshold for the year ($5,100 in
2006). While beneficiaries are in the doughnut hole, they
must continue to pay their monthly premiums, although they
do not receive any drug benefits. Only after they have spent
thousands of dollars of their own money to get out of the
hole ($2,850 in 2006), in addition to their monthly
premiums, does their coverage resume. |
Pdf 534 kb |
|
|
|
A History of the Disability Listings |
In order to facilitate the process, the Social Security
Administration created a list of diseases and conditions
which were felt to be incompatible with substantial gainful
activity (gainful employment). Persons who were not engaged
in substantial gainful activity, and whose conditions met
the requirements of one or more of the listed conditions,
were considered disabled. Called the listings, the
criteria proved so useful that they were retained and
revised periodically, and have been kept in continuous use
ever since. |
Pdf 248 kb |
|
Compassionate Allowances |
Under
titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act), we
pay benefits to individuals who meet our rules for
entitlement and have medically determinable physical or
mental impairments that are severe enough to meet the
definition of disability in the Act. The rules for
determining disability can be very complicated, but some
individuals have such serious medical conditions that their
conditions obviously meet our disability standards. |
Pdf 53 kb |
|
A CONSUMER’S GUIDE TO HEALTH INSURANCE
|
This
booklet, developed by the Vermont Department of Banking,
Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration, helps
you understand health insurance and how it works. It
explains the different types of insurance policies available
to you and what to expect once you have health insurance.
With a little knowledge, you can choose the right kind of
coverage for you and your family. |
|
|
Disability
|
The problem of being denied SS benefits appears to affect
people with Hepatitis C Virus even more, for several different reasons
|
PDF / 445KB
|
|
Handbook
(Very Large report-increased
download time)
|
Explanation of benefits from SSA
|
PDF / 8.1MB
|
|
Health and Disability insurance and Social Security Disability |
Patients
with chronic illnesses unfortunately must advocate for
themselves, whether it be with a doctor or an insurance company.
Knowing your rights will help. If you have internet access, you
have access to the best research tool in the world. |
487 kb pdf |
|
Hepatitis C-information
on Disability
|
Links to US government sites
|
|
|
Health
Hippo: Evaluations of Social Security Disability part
one
|
Social Security disability benefits are often the ultimate
safety net for persons suffering from medical impairments
that make it impossible for them to work. For most people,
however, struggling through the Social Security Administration's
bureaucracy is frustrating, confusing and slow.
|
|
|
Health
Hippo: Evaluations of Social Security Disability part two
|
Social Security disability benefits are often the ultimate
safety net for persons suffering from medical impairments
that make it impossible for them to work. For most people,
however, struggling through the Social Security Administration's
bureaucracy is frustrating, confusing and slow.
|
|
|
Health
Hippo: Evaluations of Social Security Disability part three
|
Social Security disability benefits are often the ultimate
safety net for persons suffering from medical impairments
that make it impossible for them to work. For most people,
however, struggling through the Social Security Administration's
bureaucracy is frustrating, confusing and slow.
|
|
|
How States Can Make More Patients Eligible for Part D’s Full
Low Income Subsidy/Extra Help at Little or Even No State
Cost
|
Medicare
patients with incomes (using the SSI income counting rules
and disregards) under 135% of the Federal Poverty Level, or
FPL ($1103 monthly for one) and with assets (other than a
home of any value; any vehicles of any
value; and a separate burial fund up to $1500 per person)
under $6.000 ($9,000 per couple) qualify for full Low Income
Subsidy (LIS) Extra Help Medicare Part D prescription
coverage: No deductible or premium; no donut hole; co-pays
of only $1/$2 per generic and $3/$5 per brand name drug.
Co-pays and income and asset levels will rise with inflation
yearly, as will the non-Extra Help Part D premiums,
deductibles and donut hole and catastrophic thresholds.
|
|
| |
We offer a monthly newsletter dealing with
the various issues surrounding infectious diseases. To
find out more click
HERE. |
|
|
|
MEDICAID AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES |
Special
Medicaid Eligibility Provisions for Persons with
Disabilities for New York |
Pdf 163 kb |
|
Medicare Stand-Alone Prescription Drug Plans |
By state |
|
|
MSP PROGRAMS OFFER $88.50 MORE IN SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS,
PRESCRIPTIONS WITH SMALL CO-PAYS AND EVEN---FOR MANY--
COVERAGE OF MEDICARE DEDUCTIBLES AND CO-PAYMENTS |
The
little-known Medical Savings Programs (MSPs) can mean an
extra $88.50 monthly in Social Security checks in 2006 and
extra medical and prescription drug benefits for disabled
and elderly persons who are on Medicare but are not also
on SSI or Medicaid already.
|
|
|
Obtaining Social Security Benefits for Patients with Liver
Disease
|
Evaluation of Social Security Disability
|
|
|
Pulling away the safety nets |
The Safety
Net She Believed In Was Pulled Away When She Fell Debra Potter
made a good living selling disability coverage. But like many
working Americans, she learned the hard way that federal law now
favors insurers. |
|
|
|
|
Sample Disability Policies |
The
following sample policy statements are for various types of
disability policies. Generally, disability leaves are granted
with pay, or with pay provided through an insurance plan, and
without loss of credit for the employee’s length of service with
the company for short-term disability. The following samples
are for illustration purposes only. The policy terms and
conditions available from your insurer could be quite different
from the terms set out in these policies. These policies,
however, should be useful in giving you a sense of how a
disability policy is structured and the types of issues you’ll
need to discuss with your insurer. |
|
|
SHOULD NEEDY FAMILIES BE REQUIRED TO TAKE DRUG TESTS TO
RECEIVE AID? |
Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) introduced a bill that would amend the
Social Security Act to require States to implement a drug
testing program for applicants for and recipients of assistance
under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
program.
If an applicant fails a drug test, or was convicted of a drug
related crime they can be denied aid. Also, states would be
allowed to require random or set time drug tests. A person can
be permanently denied aid if they fail three drug tests or
receive three drug related convictions. |
|
|
Social Security findings should play key role |
''As long as
the worker can engage in 'substantial gainful activity,' he is
not disabled even if the only work that he is capable of doing
is only part time. E.g., Brewer v. Chater, 103 F.3d 1384,
1391-92 (7th Cir. 1997); 20 C.F.R. §404.1572(a). Of course, the
work must not be so meager as not to be substantial and gainful.
See 20 C.F.R. §§404.1573(e), 404.1574(a), (b). But the same, it
turns out, is true under ITT's disability plan |
|
|
SSA
ISSUES RULES IMPORTANT TO BENEFICIARIES IF SSA DECIDES THAT
THEIR CONDITIONS ARE NO LONG DISABLING
|
For over two
decades, federal law has required that the Social Security
Administration continue payment of disability benefits to a
person whom SSA has determined if SSA determines that the person
is participating in a vocational rehabilitation program and
there is a likelihood that completing the program will make it
less likely that the person will need to resume receipt of
Social Security or Supplemental Security Income disability
benefits in the future...The purpose of this paper is to explain
the new regulations and to alert people with disabilities, their
families, schools, service providers, and advocates that these
regulations will take effect on July 25, 2005 and will be of
significant benefit to some individuals who otherwise would lose
their benefits when SSA decides that they currently are no
longer disabled |
|
|
SSI Disability
and Hepatitis B and C
|
Often Hepatitis patients become so critically ill that they
can no longer work. They can go through their savings quickly,
especially those who are on REBETRON or Interferon therapy.
|
|
|
STATE ELIGIBILITY POLICIES WHICH DISCRIMINATE
AGAINST THE DISABLED IN THE MEDICAID, MEDICAID WAIVER
EXPANSION, CHIP, AND STATE-FUNDED HEALTH & PHARMACY
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS |
Some state
Medicaid, Medicaid waiver expansion, Child Health Insurance
(CHIP), state-funded health assistance and state pharmacy
assistance programs (SPAPs) have rules that deny
eligibility, coverage, equal income levels or benefits to
disabled and aged persons. |
|
|
State Medicaid Actions—2005: What the States Said, Did and
Plan to Do |
States
faced gaping budget deficits that required lawmakers to cut
program spending, including that for higher education,
social services and health care. During this period the
states reduced spending by $236 billion due to shortfalls in
revenue |
1675 kb
pdf
|
|
State Medicaid Buy-In Programs:
Implementation Status, Enrollment and Program Design
Features |
By state
and features of each |
|
|
State Pharmaceutical Assistance Program (SPAP)
Legislation & Policy Changes To Coordinate With & Supplement
Part D: Issues, Possibilities & Challenges for HIV, Disabled
& Other Patients |
Several
states passed legislation and/or regulations creating,
altering or--in once case-- abolishing SPAPs in response to
the coming implementation of Medicare Part D, especially to
coordinating with and supplement drug coverage for those Low
Income Subsidy (LIS)/”Extra Help” patients with incomes
under 150% FPL. SPAPs can cover drugs not on individual
Part D plans’ formularies; pay LIS/Extra Help patients’
co-pays, coinsurance, deductibles and premiums; do likewise
for slightly “richer’ limited income patients (as some
newly-created or adapted SPAPs will do); and---if they meet
CMS standards—have such drug payments count toward True Out
Of Pocket (‘TrOOP”) credit for moving patients over 150% FPL
through and out of the donut hole and into Part D’s
catastrophic coverage. |
|
|
The
Language of Disability
|
"Language. . .has as much to do with the philosophical and
political conditioning of a society as geography or climate.
. .people do not realize the extent to which their attitudes
have been conditioned since early childhood by the power of
words to ennoble or condemn, augment or detract, glorify or
demean.
|
|
|
Widening State Pharmacy Assistance Programs (SPAPs) for the
Aged Only to Cover the Disabled Too |
While
state Medicaid programs appear to be prohibited by the new
law in most, if not all, cases from offering secondary,
"wraparound" drug coverage to "dual eligibles" [those
Medicare patients who are also poor enough to be on Medicaid
too] this is not so for SPAPs. They're allowed
to be secondary, "wraparound" payers if they choose to do
so. Given state budget problems, some may propose
terminating SPAP programs to save state funds, on the
[disingenuous] grounds that the new Medicare drug benefit
makes the state program unnecessary. But either way,
enactment of the Medicare Part D drug benefit means
enormous savings to SPAPs---in addition to the
savings states will get from Part D displacing some state
Medicaid drug expenses. For example, Pennsylvania was
predicted to save $150 million just from the preliminary
Medicare interim $600 drug discount card program; New
Jersey’s savings were to be $90 million; Connecticut’s were
to be $15 million; and all SPAPs will save
proportionately at least as much when the full,
permanent Part D program becomes primary payer in 2006.
|
|
** In order to view PDF files, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on
your computer. Many computers already have this software; however, if you need
it, a free copy is available for download at this site: Click
here to get Adobe Acrobat Reader.
|