|
Prevalence
of hepatitis C in prisons: WASH-C
surveillance
linked to self-reported risk
behaviours
S.M.
Gore, A.G. Bird1, S.O. Cameron2, S.J. Hutchinson3, S.M. Burns4
and
D.J.
Goldberg5
Q
J Med 1999; 92: 25-32
©
1999 Association of Physicians
From
the MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, 1 Department of
Immunology, John Radcliffe
Hospital,
Oxford, 2 Regional Virus Laboratory, Glasgow, 3 MRC-BIAS,
Edinburgh, 4 Regional
Virus
Laboratory, Edinburgh and 5 Scottish Centre for Infection and
Environmental Health, Glasgow, UK
Received
11 September 1998 and in revised form 9 November 1998
Summary
We used cross-sectional willing anonymous
salivary hepatitis C (WASH-C) surveillance linked to self-completed risk-factor questionnaires
to estimate the prevalence of salivary hepatitis C antibodies (HepCAbS) in five Scottish prisons from
1994 to 1996. Of 2121 available inmates, 1864 (88%)
participated and 1532/1864 (82%) stored samples were suitable
for testing. Overall 311/1532 (20.3%, prevalence 95%CI
18.322.3%) were HepCAbS-positive: 265/536 (49%, 95%CI
4554%) injector-inmates but only 27/899 (3%, 95%CI 24%)
non-injector-inmates. Among injectors, HepCAbS positivity was
only slightly higher (p=0.03) in those who had injected inside
prison (53%, 162/305) than in those who had not (44%, 98/224).
Those who began injecting in 199296 were much less likely
to be HepCAbS-positive than those who started pre-1992 (31%,
35/114 vs. 55%, 230/422; p<0.001). Even with injectors who
began in 199296 but had never injected inside prison, the prevalence of hepatitis C carriage was
17/63 (95%CI 1638%). The prevalence and potential
transmissibility of hepatitis C in injector-inmates are both
high. Promoting `off injecting' before `off drugs' (both
inside and outside prison), methadone prescription during
short incarcerations, alternatives to prison, and support of
HepCAbS-positive inmates in becoming eligible for treatment,
all warrant urgent consideration.
Introduction
Willing Anonymous Salivary HIV and
hepatitis C (WASH-C) surveillance studies were conducted at
five adult prisons in Scotland during 199496, with results
on HIV prevalence already published.1,2 All inmates were
invited to take part by giving a saliva sample to be tested
immediately for HIV antibodies, and eventually for hepatitis
C, and to self-complete an anonymous behavioural risk-factor
questionnaire. Saliva sample and questionnaire were linked by
sealed numerical codes, and were thus unattributable to
individual prisoners.
The five studies had high volunteer rates
(overall 88%, 1864/2121; lowest 70%, 304/434 at Perth Prison)
and took place as follows: in 1994, at Barlinnie Prison in
Glasgow, Scotland's largest prison (985 participants); in
1995, at Perth Prison, Scotland's oldest and the local prison
for Dundee (304 participants) and at Cornton Vale for female
prisoners (136 participants); in 1996, at Lowmoss Prison, near
Glasgow (293 participants) and at Aberdeen Prison (146
participants). Questionnaires by 95% of respondents
(1771/1864) passed all logical checks. Over a third of inmates
with a valid questionnaire (36%: 636/1749) reported a history
of injecting drug use. Nineteen HIV-antibody-positive saliva
results were found, predominantly in injectors (16/19).
AGB and SMG anticipated that validated
hepatitis C tests would become available,3,4 and from the
Barlinnie study on, had sought permission at the time, both
from local ethics committees and from the prisoners
themselves, for the saliva samples to be tested eventually for
hepatitis C when suitable assays had been developed.
By early January 1998, Cameron et al.3
had completed blind evaluation of an hepatitis C antibody
assay on saliva samples from hepatitis-C-antibody-positive
patients, mostly injectors, 84% of whom (97/115) were
serum-hepatitis-C-RNA-positive by polymerase chain reaction.
The saliva test classified as hepatitis-C-antibody-positive in
saliva (HepCAbS): 96/97 individuals who were
serum-hepatitis-C-RNA-positive but only 2/18 who were
serum-RNA-negative. A further 26 serum/saliva pairs were
collected from hepatitis-C-antibody-negative patients, all of
whom tested hepatitis-C-antibody-negative in saliva. We
inferred from these data that specificity would not be a
problem, and so sanctioned the testing of prisoners' saliva
samples.
The saliva test that Cameron et al. had
developed was, in effect, a surrogate marker for hepatitis C
RNA or hepatitis C carrier status. In meta-analysis of the
role of polymerase chain reaction in defining infectiousness
among people infected with hepatitis C virus, Dore et al.5
found that among 1148 people exposed to sources positive by
polymerase chain reaction, 148 cases of transmission occurred,
compared with no definite case among 874 people exposed to
negative sources.
As a surrogate marker for hepatitis C
carriage, the saliva test was thus ideal for application to
our prisoners' samples. The risk to novice injectors6,7 of
hepatitis C transmission through shared injecting during
incarceration depends critically upon the proportion of
inside-injectors with hepatitis C carrier status, their
frequency of injection, and on the transmission rate for
hepatitis C after needlestick exposure to persons positive by
polymerase chain reaction, which Dore et al.5 have estimated
as
6% (95%CI 210%). Tattooing8 during
incarceration,9,10 fights or other trauma in which there is
blood-to-blood contact are other potential transmission routes
for hepatitis C, as are blood transfusions prior to
19921113 and occupational exposure.1315 Sexual
transmission of hepatitis C can also occur but is uncommon;
the rate of maternal transmission has been quantified.16,17
International data, including from
Scotland, suggest that between 60% and 90% of injectors might
have hepatitis C antibodies,1834 with between 50% and 90%
of them being also RNA positive.3,5,18,23,33,35 Based on these
ranges and 36% of our adult prisoners having a history of
injecting drug use, we expected that between 11% and 29% of
prisoners would have hepatitis C antibodies in saliva, with
20% as a central estimate: 0.36 * 0.8019,34 * 0.70.18,23,33
We estimated the number of adult inmates
across Scottish prisons with hepatitis C antibodies in saliva
(HepCAbS, a marker for hepatitis C carrier status), and
associated risk behaviours, including the role of injecting
inside prisons. Geographical and temporal variation were also
of interest, particularly the period in which injecting
careers began (pre-1989, 19891991, 1992 or later).
Sterilization tablets were made available to all Scottish
prisoners during the latter period, namely from December 1993
following an outbreak of HIV and hepatitis B seroconversions
in Glenochil prison earlier in that year.36,37 The Scottish
Prison Service's 1998 calendar for prisoners highlighted:
`What you should know about hepatitis'.
Methods
We used the recently validated method for
detecting antibodies to hepatitis C in saliva (HepCAbS)3 which
had been shown to correlate with the presence of hepatitis C
RNA in blood, and thus with hepatitis C carrier status. The
laboratory method for identifying hepatitis C carriage by
saliva testing, its blind validation against 115 paired
blood/saliva samples, and against behavioural data for 649 of
our Barlinnie and Lowmoss prisoners with large-volume residual
saliva samples have been described more fully elsewhere.3
Briefly, salivary antibody was detected by using a modified
ELISA assay (Monolisa antiHCV new antigen: Sanofi Pasteur,
France). The reverse of the serum ratio was used, namely: four
volumes saliva (80 ΅l) to one volume of diluent (20 ΅l). The
incubation period was increased to overnight (approximately 20
h) at room temperature instead of 60 min at 40°C for serum.
The test was otherwise carried out according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The cutoff was altered to optical
density of 0.2 to enable the assay to be used to detect
RNA-positive patients. All negatives and reactives in the
optical density range 0.20.4 were retested for
confirmation.
Cameron et al.3 had no access to the
behavioural database. Pilot (Stage 1) results on 649 samples
were reported to AGB, SMG and SJH who checked them against
prisoners' self-reported history of injecting drug use.
Alignment was excellent: 120 samples were positive out of 241
from injectors with valid questionnaires (50%) but only 10/360
from self-reported non-injectors (3%). These preliminary
results were discussed with the Scottish Prison Service in
early February 1998. During February and March 1998, the
testing was completed of sufficient-volume residual saliva
samples from the Barlinnie and
Lowmoss prisoners (Stage 2); and de novo
testing was done of saliva samples which were stored with SB
at the Regional Virus Laboratory in Edinburgh and which had
come from our 199596 studies. The latter samples were
transferred to Glasgow for testing by SC to ensure homogeneity
of laboratory method across prisons.
To the 1994 questionnaire, 38 a question
was added in 1995 about having ever had a hepatitis C test;
and in 1996 about having ever had a tattoo done in prison.
Results
Table 1 shows for each prison the number
(and test result) of sufficient-volume saliva samples that
were testable for hepatitis C carriage from prisoners who had:
(i) returned a valid behavioural questionnaire, or (ii) given
an inconsistent prison or injecting history. The last column
in Table 1 also shows the untestable rate separately for
injectors (IDUs) and non-injectors.
Comparison of the untestable rate between
stage 1 (high-volume samples: 8/649) and stage 2 testing of
Barlinnie and Lowmoss samples (remainder 151/629) showed
clearly that volume of residual saliva was the main
determinant of testability. Overall, the untestable/non-assigned
rate was 18% (332/1864), with some heterogeneity between
prisons: reassuringly, much the lowest for inmates of
Barlinnie Prison whose saliva samples had been stored longest.
The untestable rate was lower, but not significantly so, at
16% (100/636) for injector-inmates than for non-injectors
(19%: 218/1135).
Overall, 311/1532 (20.3%) samples from
adult prisoners tested positive for hepatitis C antibodies in
saliva. 95%CI for HepCAbS prevalence was from 18.3% to 22.3%.
For prisoners with a valid risk-factor questionnaire, Table 2
shows the prevalence of hepatitis C carrier status for four
important subgroups: (i) prisoners who had never injected;
(ii) all injectors; (iii) injectors who had never injected
inside prison; and (iv) inside-injectors.
From Table 2, half the adult
injector-inmates of these five prisons had hepatitis C
antibodies in saliva (265/536; 95%CI 4554%), but only 3%
had of the non-injectors (27/899; 95%CI 24%).
The prevalence of HepCAbS was only
moderately higher (Mantel-Haenszel 2=4.8, p=0.03) for
inside-injectors (53%: 162/305) than for injector-inmates who
had never injected inside prison (44%: 98/224). As the former
may be characterized by a greater intensity than the latter of
injecting outside as well as inside prisons, inside-injecting
cannot be indicted as the cause of their higher prevalence of
hepatitis C carriage. Indeed, among injectors who began their
injecting career most recently, in 199296, and so had been
injecting for a maximum of 4 years 10 months prior to study,
the absolute difference in prevalence of HepCAbS was only 7%:
17/63 (27%) of those who had never injected inside prison vs.
17/50 (34%) for inside-injectors.
Table 3 shows injectors' prevalence of
HepCAbS according to the calendar period in which they began
their injecting career (pre-1989, 198991 or 199296).
Injectors who began injecting in
199296, having accumulated an estimated total of 203.5
injection-years, were very significantly less likely to have
HepCAbS (31%: 35/114) than were injectors who had started
pre-1992 (55%: 230/422, p<0.001). Recent injectors'
estimated incidence of HepCAbS during 199296 was thus 17
per 100 injection-years (35/203.5 * 100).
Only 96/265 (36%) injectors with HepCAbS
were sentenced to serve more than 1 year, namely: 13/35 (37%)
hepatitis C carrier injectors who began their injecting career
in 199296 and 83/129 (64%) whose injecting career began
before 1992.
Zero out of three first-time prisoners in
199496 who reported that they had started to inject inside
tested positive for HepCAbS (according to start of injecting
career only, an upper bound for the expected number might be:
0.31 * 3=0.93).
Twenty-seven non-injectors with valid
risk-factor questionnaires had hepatitis C antibodies in
saliva. None was known to have ever taken a blood test for
hepatitis C or to have been tattooed in prison, but not all
were asked these questions. Three of the 27 reported having
had an acute attack of hepatitis, compared to 18/880 (2%) of
all non-injectors with valid questionnaire and testable saliva
sample, markedly higher than the 0.6 expected. Other risk
factors were not significantly over-represented in the 27
non-injectors with positive HepCAbS, as follows: five had ever
been treated for a sexually transmitted disease (compared to
9% of all non-injectors (78/889), somewhat higher than
expected number of 2.4); two prisoners reported having paid
money for sex (compared to 7% of all non-injectors (58/882),
and so in line with expected: 1.8); and 13 of the 27 had been
in prison five or more times before this sentence (compared to
35% of all non-injectors (312/893), or 9.4 expected out of
non-injectors with hepatitis C antibodies in saliva).
Discussion
Two in 10 of our stored residual saliva
samples were insufficient in volume for testing. There was
some heterogeneity between prisons but this did not appear to
be attributable to length of storage or location of samples,
see Table 1. Since our method for detection of hepatitis C
antibodies in saliva closely correlates with hepatitis C RNA,
and thus hepatitis C carriage, we are able in this study to
quantify the hepatitis C carrier-related health issues which
are relevant to prisons.
The prevalence of hepatitis C carrier
status was 49% among 536 prisoners with a history of injecting
drug use (95%CI 4554%) and 3% only among 899 self-reported
non-injectors (95%CI 24%). These new data thus attest to
the frankness of prisoners' answers about injector status in
anonymous, self-completion risk behaviour questionnaires. The
only risk factor that significantly distinguished the 27
non-injectors who were hepatitis C carriers from other
non-injectors was a history of acute hepatitis. They were not
exceptional in terms of their multiplicity of past
imprisonments.
The prevalence of hepatitis C carriage
was significantly lower at 31% (35/114) among inmates who
began their injecting career in 199296, at most 4 years 10
months prior to study, than among those who started injecting
pre-1992 (55%: 230/422). It is possible that the establishment
of harm minimization interventions for injectors in the late
1980s, particularly needle or syringe exchange, has led to a
reduction in needle sharing, and thus in hepatitis C
transmission. We note, however, that because calendar period
of initiation defines length of injecting career, it is likely
to be confounded with the number of exposures to hepatitis C
infection.
It is extremely worrying that 31% of
injectors (35/114) became carriers of hepatitis C within a
maximum of 4 years 10 months after starting to inject: that
is, within an estimated 203.5 cumulative injection-years.
Since, as described above, the sensitivity of the saliva test
for hepatitis C antibodies was 96/97 for viral carriage but
98/115 (95%CI 7992%) for ever infected, two-fifths of these
injectors may have been infected with hepatitis C (31%/0.79)
giving an estimated hepatitis C infection incidence in the
range 18.721.8 per 100 injection-years, in close agreement
with van Beek et al.39 Furthermore, as in Australia, these
infections occurred during a time when community-based
interventions to prevent needle sharing were well established.
Half (17) of the above 35 hepatitis C carriers indicated that
they had never injected inside prison and so, at least for
these, transmission almost surely occurred in the community
setting.
Harm minimization measures will have
benefits for both the prisons and the outside community to
which inmates soon return. Immunization against hepatitis A
and B2 and methadone substitution, to assist opiate-dependent
injectors to come `off injecting', need to be more readily
available to injectors, both outside and inside prisons.
Scottish prisoners have superior access to sterilization
tablets compared with England and Wales,2 but continuation of
methadone prescriptions during incarceration is rare,40 which
risks a return to shared injecting during incarceration for
opiate-dependent prisoners with a history of injecting drug
use. The high prevalence, and transmissibility,5 of hepatitis
C carriage in injector-inmates are a strong argument for `off
injecting' before `off drugs' as an important harm reduction
message. Safe continuance of methadone prescriptions during
short incarcerations, or the evaluation of options other than
prison for drug-dependent offenders, are urgent public and
prisoners' health considerations.
Only 96/265 (36%) of injectors with
hepatitis C carriage had been sentenced to serve more than 1
year in prison. A sensible division of treatment
responsibilities may be for prisons to concentrate effort on
assisting longer-term injector-inmates with hepatitis C
carrier status to surmount the hurdle of eligibility for
treatment of their viraemia. Treatment with interferon41 can
cause serious side-effects and is expensive. For treatment to
be cost-effective, eligibility is restricted, whether the
patient is a prisoner or not:42 patients must typically be
`off injecting' (to avoid re-infection), cautious in their use
of hypnotics or depressants such as benzodiazepines (because
of potential for liver damage), and have minimal alcohol
intake.43
Wider availability of drugs-free wings
would assist other injectors with hepatitis C carriage who are
serving shorter sentences to begin, or to maintain, during
incarceration their effort at establishing eligibility for
outside treatment of their viraemia.
The five adult prisons where prisoners
gave consent for eventual hepatitis C testing of their stored
saliva samples held approximately half (47%: 2481/5244) the
adult prisoners in Scotland in 199697,42 accounting for two
thirds of prisoners (66%: 1827/2788) in the west of Scotland
but just over a quarter (27%: 654/2456) of the north-east
prison directorate. Taking this differential representation
into account (data not shown), we estimate that between one in
five and one in six adult prisoners
in Scotland in 1998 may be hepatitis C
carriers, or around 1000 inmates, of whom some 360 are likely
to have been sentenced for at least 1 year. Even if only half
of the latter, mainly injectors, wanted help to become
eligible for treatment of their hepatitis C carriage, and at
most half of them succeeded in achieving eligibility and
accepted treatment,44 the Scottish Prison Service may need to
anticipate adult treatment costs of up to £180 000 on an
annual basis for a few years to come. There will be additional
costs for young offenders, for whom we have no data but 8% of
whom we would expect a priori to be hepatitis-C-RNA-positive.
More generally, the health service in
Scotland can anticipate that about half the survivors out of
20 000 injectors, as estimated by the Scottish Affairs
Committee in its report on Drug Abuse in Scotland,46 may have
hepatitis C carrier status. To help in future planning, a
non-nominal register of confirmed hepatitis C cases is being
established by the Scottish Centre for Infection and
Environmental Health in association with virology
laboratories.
Similar considerations apply elsewhere.
In England and Wales, Bacchus et al.46 estimated that 22% of
adult prisoners had a history of injecting drug use but only
24/1009 interviewees reported injecting in prison this time,
much lower than in Scotland.2 Based on injectors alone, and
the international data cited in the Introduction, the Prison
Service in England and Wales may expect between 0.22 * 60% *
50%=6% and 0.22 * 90% * 90%=18% of adult prisoners to have
hepatitis C carrier status with 0.22 * 80% * 70%=12% as a
central prior estimate. Definitive hepatitis C prevalence
results for prisoners in England and Wales are due to be
reported later in the year; as also are those from Europe-wide
WASH-C surveillance studies in Belgium, France, Germany,
Italy, Portugal and Spain.
The higher rate of hepatitis C carriage
in inside-injectors cannot be ascribed to inside injecting per
se, because the intensity of injecting outside, and inside,
prison are likely to be highly confounded. We have not
demonstrated hepatitis C carrier status in any of three
first-time prisoners who started to inject inside on this
sentence. Our data, combined with those from forthcoming
studies which involve three times as many prisoners, should
generate an estimate (x/20) based on a denominator of 20 for
inside transmission(s) of hepatitis C carriage
to first-time prisoners who started to inject inside Europe's
prisons in the mid-1990s. Other research designs to measure
hepatitis C seroconversions during incarcerationfor
example, by anonymous linkage of paired samples and off-study
questionnaire about risk behaviours during this
incarceration7,39,48need to be correspondinglylarge.
We have shown that non-injector inmates
and prison staff live or work in a prison community in which
the prevalence of hepatitis C carriage is higher at 20% than
they typically encounter on the outside; higher, for example,
than haemodialysis staff members encounter in their working
environment49 but lower than drug treatment centre staff would
meet with. Prisoners, as well as officers, should be made
aware of the importance of universal precautions for avoidance
of blood-to-blood contacts; and should follow these
precautions carefully. Risk to non-injector prisoners and to
officers depends upon the frequency of exposure-prone
contacts, for which the rate within the Scottish Prison
Service is reportedly low, as well as on the prevalence of
hepatitis C carrier status in sources. Officers' concern has
been documented in the Third Prison Survey:50 49% of officers
in the Scottish Prison Service had worried in the last 6
months about catching hepatitis B/C.
To our knowledge, the prevalence of
hepatitis C antibodies in saliva, a marker for hepatitis C
carrier status, has not been reported in prison officers, but
could be estimated by officers' anonymous participation in
WASH-C surveillance studies with linked self-completion
questionnaire on occupational (and other behavioural or
iatrogenic) risks and precautions;51 or, if feasible, by
unlinked, anonymized hepatitis C testing of stored blood
samples which had been taken for measuring hepatitis B surface
antibody levels14 in prison staff after hepatitis B
immunization. The Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre and
the Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health
collaborate on surveillance of healthcare workers
occupationally exposed to blood-borne viruses:5254 this
could be extended to include prison officers.
Finally, consideration needs to be given
to prisoners' access to confidential hepatitis C testing, as
available in Scottish prisons, and to appropriate specialist
follow-up and treatment, if desired,45 for prisoner-patients
who are hepatitis-C-RNA-positive and have abnormal liver
function tests. Prisoner-patients should have parity of access
with other patients to a high standard of clinical follow-up.
Acknowledgments
We thank the former 199496 inmates of
Barlinnie, Perth, Cornton Vale, Lowmoss and Aberdeen Prisons
for their participation in Willing Anonymous Salivary
Hepatitis C surveillance studies; and the Scottish Prison
Service for having facilitated these studies to benefit
prisoners' and the public health. We gratefully acknowledge
the meticulous contributions of Linda Macdonald and Karen
Wilson at the Regional Virus Laboratory, Glasgow who undertook
the location, preparation and hepatitis C antibody testing of
prisoners' stored saliva samples. Funding from EC Network for
HIV and Hepatitis Prevention in Prison, Scottish Centre for
Infection and Environmental Health, and MRC Biostatistical
Initiative for Drugs and C Hepatitis Studies in Scotland (MRC-BIDCH,
Scotland) is gratefully acknowledged.
Notes
Address correspondence to Dr S.M. Gore,
MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Robinson
Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR
References
1.
Gore SM, Bird AG. Cross-sectional Willing Anonymous
Salivary HIV (WASH) surveillance studies and
self-completion risk factor questionnaire in
establishments of the Scottish Prison Service. ANSWER (AIDS
News Supplement to the Weekly Report) 1995; September:14.
2.
Bird AG, Gore SM, Hutchinson SJ, Lewis SC, Cameron S,
Burns S. Harm reduction measures and injecting inside prison
versus mandatory drugs testing: results of a cross sectional
anonymous questionnaire survey. Br Med J 1997; 315:214
3.
Cameron SO, Wilson KS, Good T, McMenamin J, McCarron B,
Pithie A, Fox R. Detection of antibodies against hepatitis C
virus in saliva: a marker of viral activity. J Viral Hepatitis
1998: in press.
4.
McIntyre PG, Laszlo J, Appleyard K, Ogden GR. Modified
enzyme immunoassay to detect hepatitis C virus antibodies in
oral fluid. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996;
15:8824.[Medline]
5.
Dore GJ, Kaldor JM, McCaughan. Systematic review of
role of polymerase chain reaction in defining infectiousness
among people infected with hepatitis C virus. Br Med J 1997;
315:3337
6.
Gore SM, Bird AG, Ross AJ. Prison rites: starting to
inject inside. Br Med J 1995; 311:11356
7.
Gore SM, Bird AG. Study size and documentation to
detect injection-related hepatitis C incidence in prison.Q J
Med 1998; 91:3537
8.
Sun D-X, Zhang F-G, Geng Y-Q, Xl D-S. Hepatitis C
transmission by cosmetic tattooing in women. Lancet 1996;
347:541.
9.
Dufour A, Alary M, Poulin C, Allard F, Noel L, Trottier
G, Lepine D, Hankins C. Prevalence and risk behaviours for HIV
infection among inmates of a provincial prison in Quebec City.
AIDS 1996; 10:100915
10.
Rotily M, Delorme C, Obadia Y, Escaffre N,
Galinier-Pujol A. Survey of French prison found injecting drug
use and tattooing occurred. Br Med J 1998; 316:777.
11.
Crawford RJ, Gillon J, Yap PL, Brookes E, McOrmish F,
Simmonds P, Dow BC, Follett EAC. Prevalence and
epidemiological characteristics of hepatitis C in Scottish
blood donors. Transfusion Med 1994; 4:1214.
12.
Seymour CA. Asymptomatic infection with hepatitis C
virus. Screening of blood donors is detecting people with
unsuspected but dangerous infection. Br Med J 1994;
308:6701
13.
de Luca M, Ascione A, Vacca C, Zarone A. Are
health-care workers really at risk of Hepatitis C Virus infection? Lancet
1992; 339:13645.
14.
Neal KR, Dornam J, Irving WL. Prevalence of hepatitis C
antibodies among healthcare workers of two teaching hospitals.
Who is at risk? Br Med J 1997; 314:17980
15.
Dorozynski A. Half a million French are infected with
hepatitis C virus. Br Med J 1995; 311:11878.
16.
Meisel H, Reip A, Faltus B, Lu M, Porst H, Wiese M,
Roggendorf M, Kruger DH. Transmission of hepatitis C to
children and husbands by women infected with contaminated
antiOD immunoglobulin. Lancet 1995; 345:120911.[
17.
Zanetti AR, Tanzi E, Paccagnini S, Principi N,
Pizzocolo G, Caccamo ML, d'Amico E, Cambie G, Vecchi L and the
Lombardy Study Group on Vertical Hepatitis C Virus Transmission.
Mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus. Lancet
1995; 345:28991
18.
Crofts N, Hopper JL, Bowden DS, Breschkin AM, Milner R,
Locarnini SA. Hepatitis C virus infection among a cohort of
Victorian injecting drug users. Med J Aust 1993; 159:23741
19.
Gore SM, Brettle RP, Burns SM, Lewis SC. Pilot study to
estimate survivors to 1995 of 198384 prevalent hepatitis C
infections in Lothian patients who tested positive or negative
for Hepatitis B surface antigen in 198384. J Infect 1998;
37:in press.
20.
Nara K, Kawano M, Igarashi M. Prevalence of hepatitis C
virus and human immunodeficiency virus among female prison
inmates in Japan (non-English). Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi
1997; 44:5560
21.
Stark K, Muller R, Bienzle U, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I.
Frontloading: a risk factor for HIV and hepatitis C virus
infection among injecting drug users in Berlin. AIDS 1996;
10:31117
22.
Anon C, del Olmo JA, Llovet F, Serra MA, Gilabert S,
Rodriguez F, Rodrigo JM. The hepatitis C virus among the
prison population of Valencia (non-English). Rev Esp Enferm
Dig 1995; 87:5058
23.
Stark K, Schreier E, Muller R, Wirth D, Driesel G,
Bienzle U. Prevalence and determinants of anti-Hepatitis C Virus
seropositivity and of Hepatitis C Virus genotype among intravenous drug
users in Berlin. Scand J Infect Dis 1995; 27:3317
24.
Ford PM, White C, Kaufmann H, MacTavish J, Pearson M,
Ford S, Sankar-Mistry P, Connop P. Voluntary anonymous linked
study of the prevalence of HIV and hepatitis C among inmates
in a Canadian federal penitentiary for women. Can Med Assoc J
1995; 153:16059.
25.
Crofts N, Stewart T, Hearne P, Ping XY, Breshkin AM,
Locarnini SA. Spread of bloodborne viruses among Australian
prison entrants. Br Med J 1995; 310:2858
26.
Schwartz TF, Dobler G, Gilch S, Jager G. Hepatitis C
and arboviral antibodies in the island population of Mauritius
and Rodrigues. J Med Virol 1994; 44:37983
27.
Vlahov D, Nelson KE, Quinn TC, Kendig N. Prevalence and
incidence of hepatitis C virus infection among male prison
inmates in Maryland. Eur J Epidemiol 1993; 9:5669
28.
Holsen DS, Harthug S, Myrmel H. Prevalence of
antibodies to hepatitis C virus and association with
intravenous drug abuse and tattooing in a national prison in
Norway. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infec Dis 1993; 12:6736.
29.
Garfein RS, Vlahov D, Galai N, Doherty MC, Nelson KE.
Viral infections in short-term injection drug users: the
prevalence of hepatitis C, hepatitis B, human
immunodeficiency, and human T lymphotropic viruses. Am J
Public Health 996; 86:65561
30.
de Carvalho HB, Mesquita F, Massad E, Bueno RC, Lopes
GT, Ruiz MA, Burattini MN. HIV and infections of similar
transmission patterns in a drug injectors community of Santos,
Brazil. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1996;
12:8492.
31. Galeazzi B,
Tufano A, Barbierato E, Bortolotti F. Hepatitis C virus
infection in Italian intravenous drug users:epidemiological
and clinical aspects. Liver 1995; 15:20912
32.
Smyth R, Keenan E, Dorman A, O'Connor J. Hepatitis C
infection among injecting drug users attending the National
Drug Treatment Centre. Irish J Med Sci 1995; 164:2678
33.
Chetwynd J, Brunton C, Blank M, Plimridge E, Baldwin D.
Hepatitis C seroprevalence amongst injecting drug users
attending a methadone programme. NZ Med J 1995; 108:3646.
34.
Goldberg D, Cameron S, McMenamin J. Hepatitis C virus
antibody prevalence among injecting drug users in Glasgow has
fallen but remains high. Commun Dis Public Health 1998;
1:957.
35.
McCaughan GW, McGuinness PH, Bishop GA, Painter DM,
Lien AS, Tulloch R, Wylie BR, Archer GT. Clinical assessment
and incidence of hepatitis C RNA in 50 consecutive RIBA-positive
volunteer blood donors. Med J Aust 1992; 157:2313
36.
Taylor A, Goldberg D, Emslie J, Wrench J, Gruer L,
Cameron S, et al. Outbreak of HIV infection in a Scottish
prison. Br Med J 1995; 310:28992
37.
Gore SM, Bird AG, Burns SM, Goldberg DJ, Ross AJ. Drug
injection and HIV prevalence in inmates of Glenochil prison.
Br Med J 1995; 310:2936
38.
Bird AG, Gore SM, Cameron S, Ross AJ, Goldberg DJ.
Anonymous HIV surveillance with risk factor elicitation at
Scotland's largest prison, Barlinnie. AIDS 1995; 9:8018
39.
van Beek I, Dwyer R, Dore GJ, Luo K, Kaldor JM.
Infection with HIV and hepatitis C virus among injecting drug
users in a prevention setting: retrospective cohort study. Br
Med J 1998; 317:4337
40.
Gruer L, Macleod J. Interruption of methadone treatment
by imprisonment. Br Med J 1997; 314:1691.
41.
Terrault N, Wright T. Interferon and hepatitis C. N
Engl J Med 1995; 332:150911.
42.
Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons for England and
Wales. Prisoner or patient? London, Home Office, 1996.
43.
Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P for the OBSVIRC, METAVIR,
CLINIVIR and DOSVIRC groups. Natural history of liver fibrosis
progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Lancet 1997;
349:82532
44.
Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons for Scotland.
Report for 199697. Scottish Office Edinburgh, Home
Department, August 1997 (ix).
45.
Foster GR, Goldin RD, Main J, Murray-Lyon I, Hargreaves
S, Thomas HC. Management of chronic hepatitis C: clinical
audit of biopsy based management algorithm. Br Med J 1997;
315:4538
46.
Scottish Affairs Committee. Drug Abuse in Scotland
(First Report: Volume 1). London, HM Stationary Office,
1994:vi.
47.
Bacchus L, Strang J, Taylor C, Heuston J, Whiteley C,
Gossop M, Green J, Maden T, Macaulay R, Powell K, Gordon D,
Nettleton H, Sparks R, Whitehead B. HIV/AIDS: Knowledge,
Attitudes and Behaviour of Adult Male Prisoners in England and
Wales. Report to Home Office Research and Planning Unit, May
1997.
48.
Gore SM, Bird AG, Burns SM. HIV epidemiology in
prisons: Anonymous voluntary HIV surveillance with risk factor
elicitation. In: Liebling A, ed. Deaths in Custody. Caring for
People at Risk. Whiting & Birch, 1996:11442.
49.
Niu MT, Coleman PJ, Alter MJ. Multicenter study of
hepatitis C virus infection in chronic hemodialysis patients
and hemodialysis center staff members. Am J Kidney Dis 1993;
22:56873.
50.
Wozniak E, Dyson G, Carnie J. The Third Prison Survey.
Scottish Prison Service Occasional Paper No. 3, 1998:126.
51.
Felix DH, Bird AG, Anderson HG, Gore SM, Brettle RP,
Wray D. Recent non-sterile inoculation injuries to dental
professionals in the Lothian region of Scotland. Br Dental J
1994; 176:1804.
52.
Evans B, Goldberg D. Register of cases of occupational
exposure exists. Br Med J 1998; 316:7012.
53.
Center for Disease Control. Recommendations for
follow-up of health-care workers after occupational exposure
to hepatitis C virus. MMWR 1997; July 4:6036.
54.
Heptonstall J, Mortimer P. New virus, old story. Lancet
1995; 345:599600.
This article has been cited by other
articles:
Jowett, S.L., Agarwal, K., Smith, B.C., Craig, W.,
Hewett, M., Bassendine,
D.R., Gilvarry, E., Burt, A.D., Bassendine, M.F.
(2001). Managing chronic
hepatitis C acquired through intravenous drug use. QJ
Med 94: 153-158
Ford, P.M., Pearson, M., Sankar-Mistry, P., Stevenson,
T., Bell, D., Austin,
J. (2000). HIV, hepatitis C and risk behaviour in a
Canadian medium-security
federal penitentiary. QJ Med 93: 113-119
|