|
Active
surveillance of hepatitis C infection in
the
UK and Ireland
Arch
Dis Child 2000;82:286-291 ( April )
D
M Gibba, P E Neavea, P A Tookeya, M Ramsayb, H Harrisb, K
Balogunb,
D Goldbergc, G Mieli-Verganid, D Kellye
a
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of
Child Health,
London,
UK, b Immunisation Department, Communicable Disease
Surveillance
Centre,
London, UK, c Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental
Health,
Scotland,
UK, d Paediatric Liver Service, King's College Hospital,
London, UK,
e
Liver Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
Correspondence
to: Dr D M Gibb, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials
Unit, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK email:
d.gibb@ctu.mrc.ac.uk
Accepted
6 October 1999
Abstract
AIM To investigate the prevalence,
distribution, and clinical details of paediatric hepatitis C
virus (Hepatitis C Virus) infection in the UK and Ireland.
METHODS Active monthly surveillance
questionnaire study coordinated through the British Paediatric
Surveillance Unit, to all consultant paediatricians in 1997
and 1998.
RESULTS A total of 182 Hepatitis C Virus infected
children were reported from 54 centres and by paediatricians
from eight different specialties. In 40
children Hepatitis C Virus was acquired through mother to child transmission
(MTC children); 142 were infected by contaminated blood
products (n = 134), organ transplantation (n = 2), needles (n
= 4), or unknown risk factor (n = 2). Intravenous drug use was
the risk factor for 35 mothers of MTC children. Twelve
children were coinfected with HIV and four with HBV. Recent
serum aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase
values were at least twofold greater than the upper limit of
normal in 24 of 152 children; this occurred in five of 11 HIV
coinfected children.
Liver histology, available in 53
children, showed normal (7%), mild (74%), moderate (17%), or
severe (2%) hepatitis. Twenty eight children had received
therapy with interferon alfa.
CONCLUSION Most current paediatric Hepatitis C Virus
infection in UK and Ireland has been acquired from
contaminated blood products, and most children are
asymptomatic. There is a need for multicentre trials to inform
clinical practice and development of good practice guidelines
in this area. Long term follow up of this cohort of Hepatitis C Virus
infected children is planned to help determine the natural
history over the long term of Hepatitis C Virus acquired during infancy and
childhood.
(Arch Dis Child 2000;82:286-291)
Keywords: hepatitis C infection; surveillance; natural
history; UK and
Ireland
Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C Virus) is a leading
cause of chronic liver disease, and because of the magnitude
of the infection worldwide, has important implications for
public health.1-3 Once infection has occurred, the virus
persists in the host in a high proportion of cases and can
lead to chronic liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma.1 4
Because of the long latency of the disease, many individuals
acquiring Hepatitis C Virus infection during adulthood may die with, rather
than of the infection.5 However, children infected in their
early years may be more likely to develop hepatic sequelae in
early adulthood.
The major routes for Hepatitis C Virus transmission to
children include perinatal transmission from an infected woman
(mother to child (MTC) transmission), transfusion of infected
blood or blood products, and transplant of an infected organ.
Intrafamilial transmission has also been reported but appears
to be relatively uncommon if possibilities of blood-blood
contact are excluded.6 In the UK, routine screening
of blood, blood products, and organ donors for Hepatitis C Virus started in
September 1991. However, although some children were
identified through the blood transfusion service "lookback
exercise" which commenced in 1995 with the aim of
tracing, counselling, and testing recipients of Hepatitis C Virus infected
blood, children who received blood or blood products prior to
1991 have not been systematically screened. The main future
burden of paediatric Hepatitis C Virus infection will be from MTC
transmission, where the risk is approximately 5%,7-10 and
higher if the mother is coinfected with HIV.7 11 Although it
is currently recommended that children of known Hepatitis C Virus positive
mothers in the UK are tested for Hepatitis C Virus, it is unclear how
frequently this is carried out or what proportion of Hepatitis C Virus
infections in pregnancy are recognised.
Between 1992 and 1996, there were over
5000 laboratory reports of anti-Hepatitis C Virus antibody positive
individuals in England and Wales. The most commonly reported
risk factor (in about 80% of those with risk factors reported)
was intravenous drug use (IDU).12 Approximately 20% of Hepatitis C Virus
infected adult reports were in women of childbearing age.12
There were also 54 positive Hepatitis C Virus antibody reports in children
aged 1-15 years, but only three of these were reported to be
acquired from MTC transmission, although a further 22 reports
were in infants whose infection status could not be
ascertained.12 In 1997 and 1998, 99 of 7523 laboratory reports
were in children; 66 of these were in babies under 12 months
with indeterminate infection status (M Ramsay, personal
communication).
Paediatricians from a range of
specialties including haematology, oncology, hepatology,
infectious diseases, and neonatology may be involved in the
diagnosis, management, and follow up of Hepatitis C Virus infected children.
The aims of this study were to collate and describe
information on the prevalence, distribution, clinical, and
management details of known paediatric Hepatitis C Virus infection in the UK
and the Republic of Ireland.
Methods
The study was carried out through the
British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU) of the Royal
College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), an active
monthly reporting scheme involving all consultant
paediatricians in the UK and Ireland, with a response rate in
1997 of 93%.13 Paediatricians were asked to report all
children under 16 years with symptomatic or asymptomatic Hepatitis C Virus
infection and children under 18 months born to women with
known Hepatitis C Virus infection in pregnancy. Hepatitis C Virus infection was defined by
the presence of confirmed positive Hepatitis C Virus antibody in a child
over 18 months, or two consecutive positive Hepatitis C Virus RNA tests at
any age.
In the first month of surveillance,
paediatricians were requested to report all eligible children
under their care. Case ascertainment was checked against
laboratory reports to the Communicable Disease Surveillance
Centre (CDSC) and the Scottish Centre for Infection and
Environmental Health (SCIEH), reports of children traced
during the National Blood Authority's Hepatitis C Virus lookback exercise,
and reports of children coinfected with HIV that were reported
through the BPSU to the National Paediatric HIV Programme at
the Institute of Child Health (ICH), London.14
Demographic and birth/perinatal details,
risk factors for Hepatitis C Virus infection, clinical presentation,
serology and virology data on Hepatitis C Virus diagnosis, liver function
tests (aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine
aminotransferase (ALT)), liver histology results, and details
of treatment were collected by questionnaire from reporting
paediatricians. For children at risk of acquiring Hepatitis C Virus through
MTC transmission, maternal demographic and risk information
were also collected. Paediatricians were
requested to classify liver histology
results as normal, mild, moderate, or severe hepatitis, or
cirrhosis. Where possible they were also requested to provide
copies of histology reports, which were scored blind by two
independent hepatologists for both inflammation and fibrosis
as normal, mild, moderate, or severe. In a subset of children,
where sera or plasma were available and genotypic testing had
not been done, Hepatitis C Virus genotyping was undertaken in a single
laboratory using an amplification nested
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method
described previously.15 Date of acquisition of Hepatitis C Virus was
estimated by date of birth in MTC acquired cases and from date
of risk exposure in other cases, classified as known, likely,
or inferred.
Analyses were undertaken using
Statistical Analysis System (SAS, Cary, New Carolina, USA),
using descriptive statistics and
2 tests where appropriate. If both AST and ALT liver
enzyme results were reported, the higher result in relation to
the upper limit of normal was used. Where date of Hepatitis C Virus
acquisition was unknown, a minimum follow up time was
calculated from the date of the first positive Hepatitis C Virus test.
Results
Between April 1997 and December 1998, 660
notifications were received through the BPSU and a further 113
from other sources. A total of 51% of BPSU notifications were
in the first month, 41% over the subsequent six months, and
the remainder (average 10 per month) over the next 17 months.
Excluding 157 duplicates and 70 outstanding reports, there
were reports on 546 children. Of these 182 had definitive Hepatitis C Virus
infection. A further 364 children of indeterminate infection
status and born to Hepatitis C Virus infected women will be reported
elsewhere.
The 182 infected children were reported
from 54 paediatric centres in all parts of the UK and the
Republic of Ireland (table 1). Six centres, each reporting 10
or more children, were caring for a total of 84 children (46%)
whereas 34 centres each reported only one child. Reports were
received from 32 general paediatricians, and from 12
haematology/oncology, seven gastroenterology/hepatology, two
nephrology, one endocrinology, two infectious diseases, one
neonatology, and two community paediatric specialists.
RISK FACTORS FOR Hepatitis C Virus INFECTION
Hepatitis C Virus acquired through MTC transmission
Among the 40 children with Hepatitis C Virus infection
acquired from presumed MTC transmission, 17 were born to
mothers whose infection status was known before or during
pregnancy. In the other 23 children, MTC transmission was
assumed but infection could have been acquired postnatally. In
19, the mother was confirmed to be Hepatitis C Virus infected after
detection of infection in the child. The remaining four had no
other risk factors and their mothers were intravenous drug
users, but untested for Hepatitis C Virus (table
2). Median age at report was 1.9 years
(range 0.3-6.5) in the children followed from birth, compared
with 8.3 years (range 0.2-14.4) in children diagnosed later.
Children acquiring Hepatitis C Virus through other
routes A total of 134 children (74%) were reported to have
acquired Hepatitis C Virus infection from contaminated blood or blood
products, two from organ transplantation, four from
contaminated needles, and in two children the risk factor was
unknown (table 1). Ten children who received contaminated
blood products also had organ transplants: four bone marrow,
three kidney, and three liver. Treatment for haemophilia and
leukaemia were the most common reasons for receiving blood
products but the underlying reason was not known in 26
children, most of whom received transfusions early in life and
had transferred to the care of a different paediatrician. Only
one child, who received contaminated blood in Russia, was born
after September 1991. Boys
were over-represented among children
infected by contaminated blood products; this group included
41 boys with haemophilia and 21 with leukaemia.
DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTION, Hepatitis C Virus RNA
POSITIVITY, AND DURATION OF FOLLOW UP
A total of 171 children over 18 months of
age were Hepatitis C Virus antibody positive by either two second or third
generation enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests or
by an ELISA test supplemented by recombinant immunoblot asay.
One child coinfected with HIV and Hepatitis C Virus from MTC transmission
was repeatedly Hepatitis C Virus antibody negative but Hepatitis C Virus RNA positive on
two consecutive occasions at the age of 9 years. The mother
was also dually infected with Hepatitis C Virus and HIV, and anti-Hepatitis C Virus
negative but Hepatitis C Virus RNA positive. Ten children aged 18 months or
less at the time of report were considered to have acquired
infection through MTC transmission on the basis of two
consecutive positive Hepatitis C Virus RNA tests.
A total of 171 children (94%) had one (n
= 50), two (n = 53), or three (n = 68) consecutive Hepatitis C Virus RNA
test results reported. Of these, 107 (62%) were positive on
one or more tests, 37 (22%) were consistently negative, and 27
(16%) had mixed results.
None of the children with only PCR negative results had
received any specific anti-Hepatitis C Virus therapy. Of the two children
with infection acquired from MTC with three consecutive
negative PCR results, both mothers had tested Hepatitis C Virus antibody
positive (one before and one after the birth of the child) and
the children remained Hepatitis C Virus antibody positive after18 months of age.
Figure 1 shows the distributions of
duration of follow up for presumed MTC infected children and
those acquiring Hepatitis C Virus through other routes. Among children
infected through other routes, follow up duration was similar
among children with known and those with likely date of Hepatitis C Virus
acquisition. The minimum median duration of follow up for all
children was estimated to be 6.7 years (range 0.04-15.6).
CLINICAL DETAILS
Coinfections with HBV and HIV
Six children (5%) infected through
contaminated blood products (four with haemophilia) had HIV
infection. One of the children with haemophilia and HIV was
also reported to have hepatitis B infection; a further three
children (two with leukaemia) had hepatitis B infection
without HIV. Ten (25%) of the children infected through MTC
transmission were born to mothers coinfected with HIV, and six
of these children were themselves dually infected with HIV and
Hepatitis C Virus (table 4). A further
14 mothers (35%) were known to be HIV
negative; in the remaining 16 (40%), HIV status was unknown.
The HIV and Hepatitis C Virus coinfected mothers all had IDU as a risk
factor for both infections and were reported from Dublin (n =
5), Scotland (n = 3), and London (n = 2).
Signs/symptoms, liver function, and Hepatitis C Virus
genotypes
Only one child was reported to have
symptoms of clinical significance. This child had received an
Hepatitis C Virus infected blood transfusion at 16 months of age,
subsequently developed cryptogenic cirrhosis, and required a
liver transplant at age 3 years and 4 months. Although it was
reported that cirrhosis was probably not caused by Hepatitis C Virus
infection, Hepatitis C Virus was isolated from the diseased liver at the
time of transplantation and therefore the possibility of rapid
progression to cirrhosis in this child cannot be excluded.
AST or ALT results taken closest to the
time of reporting were normal or less than twice the upper
limit of normal in 128 of the 152 children (84%) in whom they
were reported (table 4). Five of the 11 children (45%) with
HIV coinfection had AST results over twice the upper limit of
normal compared with 11 of 141 (8%) HIV negative children (2
18.0, p = 0.001). Liver enzyme results were not reported for
the children with HBV infection. Only one of the 37 children
with consistently negative Hepatitis C Virus RNA results had abnormal liver enzyme values.
In 53 children from 25 centres, results
of liver histology were available (table 4). Most were
children with previous malignant disease and only one child
with haemophilia had undergone a biopsy. One child with mild
hepatitis had coinfection with HIV and one with moderate
hepatitis had HBV infection. All children who had biopsies had
one or more positive Hepatitis C Virus RNA results reported. Ten children
(19%) were reported on the questionnaire to have moderate (n =
9) or severe hepatitis (n = 1) at the time of biopsy, and none
to have cirrhosis. Full histology reports were received for 33
children (62%) and scored by two independent reviewers. Exact
concordance of scoring between the two reviewers for the
degree of both inflammation and fibrosis occurred for 21
reports (64%). In general, fibrosis and inflammation scores
concurred but where there was discrepancy, the fibrosis scores
given by the reviewers were generally higher than their
inflammation scores or the hepatitis gradings reported on the
questionnaires. Taking fibrosis scores, reviewers scored one
of the biopsy specimens (3%) as severe and seven (21%) as
moderate, compared with one report (3%) of severe and three
(9%) of moderate hepatitis on the questionnaire. Length of
time since Hepatitis C Virus acquisition, and underlying disease (excluding
children with haemophilia) did not differ between children
with normal or mild biopsy findings, compared to those with
moderate or severe findings. Data on genotype and viral load
were too incomplete to be analysed.
Hepatitis C Virus genotypes were established for 73 of
the 114 children (64%) with most recent positive Hepatitis C Virus RNA
results. Countries of birth were known for 17 MTC infected
children with genotypes. All were born in the UK (n = 11) or
Ireland (n = 6) and all but one mother were born in the UK or
Ireland. The majority (60%) were type 1a or 1b but all types
were represented in both
MTC acquired Hepatitis C Virus and infection acquired
through other routes (table 4). Owing to the incomplete nature
of these data, it was not possible to relate genotype to other
disease characteristics. Similarly, although data on Hepatitis C Virus viral
load were requested, they were reported for only 37 children,
and in this principally cross sectional study, could not be
reliably related to other factors.
Therapy
A total of 28 children (21%) who had
received infected blood products or an organ transplant had
received treatment with interferon alfa compared with three
(8%) of the children acquiring Hepatitis C Virus through MTC transmission.
No child was reported to have received any other therapy.
Nineteen of the treated children (61%) were reported from four
centres caring for 64 children (35%), whereas the remaining 12
children were from 10 different centres. Thirteen children
with haemophilia received interferon alfa without having a
pretreatment biopsy. Among the 15 with biopsy results reported
pretreatment, 10 were classified as mild and five as moderate
hepatitis, both by the independent reviewers and on the
questionnaires.
In 22 children, more detailed information
on the duration and response to interferon alfa therapy was
available, although dose, which varied from 1 to 6 million
units given three times weekly, was reported for only eight
children. In 11 children, Hepatitis C Virus PCR remained negative at or near
the end (n = 7) or after completion (n = 3) of therapy, and
one child still on therapy at the time of report, was PCR
negative one month after starting therapy. In 11 children, PCR
either remained positive throughout therapy
(n = 6) or rebounded after completion of
therapy (n = 5), with one of these children responding to a
further longer course of interferon alfa. Duration of therapy
was 12 months or longer in 10 of the 11 courses where response
occurred, compared with a duration of six months or less in
nine of the 11 courses resulting in non-response or relapse.
Toxicity was cited as the reason for stopping interferon alfa
therapy at two months in one non-responding child.
Discussion
In this paper, we have described the
epidemiology, natural history, and management details of
paediatric Hepatitis C Virus infection reported through active surveillance
in the UK and Republic of Ireland up until the end of 1998.
The majority of reported children acquired Hepatitis C Virus through blood
or blood products. Among children with presumed MTC
transmission of Hepatitis C Virus, nearly 90% of mothers had current or past
IDU as the risk factor for Hepatitis C Virus acquisition. The possibility of
postnatal intrafamilial acquisition rather than peripartum
transmission was present in about half these children, and has
been reported elsewhere.6 It should be noted that children
under 18 months of age all had definitive Hepatitis C Virus infection, based
on at least two consecutive positive Hepatitis C Virus RNA PCR results.
Children recently born to infected women and reported to the
study with indeterminate Hepatitis C Virus infection status are currently
being followed up and will be the subject of a future report.
We are aware that not all known
paediatric Hepatitis C Virus infection will have been reported to our study
during the 20 month period of active surveillance. Apart from
failure to report among some paediatricians, some children may
be under the care of adult physicians, or not receiving
specialist care. Infected children are distributed throughout
the UK and despite the relatively small numbers, are cared for
in a large number of centres with only six centres looking
after 10 or more children. Supplementary
sources of case ascertainment including
laboratory reports to the Public Health Laboratory Service and
SCIEH (where demographic data allowed matching to take place)
and Hepatitis C Virus infected children traced during the National Blood
Authority's (NBA) lookback exercise suggest that as many as
30% of infected children may not have been reported to us. It
is of interest that the 20 children (36%) identified by the
NBA and not reported in this study tended to be older (p =
0.06) and were more
likely to have negative Hepatitis C Virus RNA results
(p = 0.02) compared with those in our study (Helen Harris,
personal communication, 1999). All HIV and Hepatitis C Virus coinfected
children reported to the National Study of HIV in Pregnancy
and Childhood at the Institute of Child Health, London were
reported to our study. There appears to be little overlap
between Hepatitis C Virus and HIV infection acquired through MTC
transmission, except in Ireland and Scotland where IDU is the
maternal risk factor for both. Whereas over 80% of vertically
acquired HIV in the UK is among children of African origin
residing in the Thames regions,14 only 28% of Hepatitis C Virus acquired
through MTC transmission was from London and there were no
reported cases among black African children. Hepatitis C Virus testing
policies for children, whether prospectively or
retrospectively known to be born to Hepatitis C Virus infected women, are
likely to differ by unit and among different groups of
paediatricians. It is also likely that more children will be
diagnosed in the future, particularly if more effective
therapies for Hepatitis C Virus become available.
As previously reported, among
definitively Hepatitis C Virus antibody positive children, there is evidence
of spontaneous clearance of Hepatitis C Virus. A total of 29 children (16%),
including both those with Hepatitis C Virus through MTC transmission and
those infected through other routes had two or more
consecutive samples negative for Hepatitis C Virus RNA by PCR. Wide
intraindividual variation in PCR positivity has been
previously reported among vertically infected children16 and
longer follow up is required to confirm whether these children
have really cleared infection. Intermittent viraemia is well
recognised in adult Hepatitis C Virus infection, and viraemia in pregnant
women has been shown to be positively related to the risk of
MTC Hepatitis C Virus transmission.8 In our study, all children with two or
three consecutive negative Hepatitis C Virus RNA results also had normal
aminotransferase results; none had had a liver biopsy, and
none had received any therapy. Because of the nature of this
cross sectional survey, these figures must be interpreted with
caution. However, they are in keeping with other studies in
adults and children.17 18 The converse situation of Hepatitis C Virus RNA
positivity with negative Hepatitis C Virus antibody results was only
reported in one child in this study and could be explained by
immune suppression as a result of coinfection with HIV. This
case emphasises the need to undertake Hepatitis C Virus RNA as well as Hepatitis C Virus
antibody tests, if Hepatitis C Virus is suspected in an immunosuppressed
child.
The median duration of infection for
children with known or likely dates of Hepatitis C Virus acquisition at the
time of reporting was almost eight years, and the minimum
follow up since infection for the whole cohort was nearly
seven years. Very few children had any signs or symptoms over
this period. However, among those where liver biopsies were
performed (and in whom follow up was
similar to that in non-biopsied
childrendata not shown), about a quarter had progressed to
moderate or severe hepatitis, but none to cirrhosis. The
exception was a child who required a liver transplant for
cryptogenic cirrhosis and in whom it was not possible to
exclude cirrhosis caused by Hepatitis C Virus acquired less than two years
previously. As these children have acquired infection in
childhood, even assuming long incubation periods, those who
have not cleared infection are likely to require therapy for
chronic liver disease, including transplantation in early to
mid adulthood at considerable cost to the community.1
We did not attempt to relate AST or ALT
values to liver histology results, because the time relation
between the two parameters could not easily be determined in
this cross sectional study. In an observational study by García-Monzón
et al, the authors suggested that histological changes in
children with Hepatitis C Virus may be slower to develop than in adults,
although duration of infection and prevalence of 1b genotypes
were similar in the adults and children in their study.19 It
was unclear how subjects were selected for this study which could
have been biased by differences in referral patterns between
Hepatitis C Virus infected adults compared with children.
We did not collect data on reasons for
treating with interferon alfa. It is of interest that the
proportion of children treated did not seem to be related to
severity of hepatitis as classified by reporting
paediatricians or reviewers. Duration and dose of alfa
interferon varied considerably although full reasons for this
cannot be analysed from this study. These factors may reflect
the large number of centres treating relatively few children,
but may also reflect changes in clinical practice over time,
as regimens of interferon alfa have changed with emergent data
from adult trials. The data presented in this paper on
response to therapy must be interpreted with caution, as we
had little information on durability of response after
stopping therapy. Furthermore, the short duration of therapy
in non-responders may have been the result of clinicians
choosing to stop therapy early in children who did not become PCR negative on therapy. No
child had received ribavirin therapy at the time of reporting
to this study.
Only a few small randomised controlled
trials of alfa interferon have been undertaken in paediatric
Hepatitis C Virus infection.20 21 With recent increased evidence of the
efficacy of ribavirin in combination with alfa interferon in
adults,2 22 23 this situation may change and it is important
that studies of its efficacy and toxicity in children are
undertaken.
In conclusion, this paper reports on some
aspects of known Hepatitis C Virus infection in children in the UK and the
Republic of Ireland. The magnitude of the problem is likely to
be greater than reported here because of under reporting, loss
to follow up of asymptomatic infected children, and variation
in testing policies for children who received blood or blood
products prior to 1991, and among children born to known Hepatitis C Virus
infected women. Long term follow up of this cohort of Hepatitis C Virus
infected children
through the National Hepatitis C Virus Registers in
England and Wales24 and in Scotland is planned to help
determine the natural history of Hepatitis C Virus acquired during infancy
and childhood. In view of differing management and treatment
and the large number of centers caring for small numbers of
children in the UK and in other European countries, it is
important that clinical trials of management strategies and
therapies are undertaken to inform paediatricians on the most
appropriate way to manage children with Hepatitis C Virus infection.
Acknowledgments
We thank the BPSU, all reporting
paediatricians, and other health professionals who have
completed questionnaires, in particular those with larger
numbers of children at their centres including Alistair Baker,
Karina Butler, Mary Healy, Anna Lloyd, Jacqueline Mok, Jean
Petrie, Cath Sinay, Jaswant Sira, Sharon Sneddon, and Cecilia
Ward. We thank Trinh Duong and Janet Masters from the National
Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood for their support and
collaboration; Kathryn Harris at PHLS who undertook
centralised Hepatitis C Virus genotyping; AE Ades and Trinh Duong for help
with the statistical analysis; and Catherine Peckham for
comments on the paper. This research was funded by the UK
Department of Health. All views, and any errors are the
responsibility of the authors alone.
References
1.
Anonymous. Recommendations for prevention and control
of hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C Virus) infection and Hepatitis C Virus-related chronic
disease. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Morb
Mortal Wkly Rep 1998;47:1-39
2.
Liang TJ. Combination therapy for hepatitis C
infection. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1549-1550[Full Text].
3.
Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C. Hepatology
1997;26:62-5S.
4.
Van der Poel CL, Cuypers HT, Reesink HW. Hepatitis C
virus six years on. Lancet 994;344:1475-1479[Medline].
5.
Seeff LB, Buskell Bales Z, Wright EC, et al. Long-term
mortality after transfusion-associated non-A, non-B hepatitis
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Group. N
Engl J Med 1992;327:1906-1911[Abstract].
6.
Honda M, Kaneko S, Unoura M, Kobayashi K, Murakami S.
Risk of hepatitis C virus infections through household contact
with chronic carriers: analysis of nucleotide sequences.
Hepatology 1993;17:971-976[Abstract].
7.
Thomas SL, Newell ML, Peckham CS, Ades AE, Hall AJ. A
review of hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C Virus) vertical transmission: risks
of transmission to infants born to mothers with and without
Hepatitis C Virus viraemia or human immunodeficiency virus infection. Int J
Epidemiol 1998;27:108-117[Abstract].
8.
Resti M, Azzari C, Mannelli F, et al. Mother to child
transmission of hepatitis C virus: prospective study of risk
factors and timing of infection in children born to women
seronegative for HIV-1. BMJ 1998;317:437-441[Abstract/Full
Text].
9.
Granovsky MO, Minkoff HL, Tess BH, et al. Hepatitis C
virus infection in the mothers and infants cohort study
Pediatrics 1998;102:355-359[Abstract/Full Text].
10.
Spencer JD, Latt N, Beeby PJ, et al. Transmission of
hepatitis C virus to infants of human immunodeficiency
virus-negative intravenous drug-using mothers: rate of
infection and assessment of risk factors for transmission. J
Viral Hepat 1997;4:395-409[Medline].
11.
Thomas DL, Villano SA, Riester KA, et al. Perinatal
transmission of hepatitis C virus from human immunodeficiency
virus type 1-infected mothers. Women and Infants Transmission
Study. J Infect Dis 1998;177:1480-1488[Medline].
12.
Ramsay ME, Balogun MA, Collins M, Balraj V. Laboratory
surveillance of hepatitis C virus infection in England and
Wales: 1992 to 1996. Commun Dis Public Health 1998;1:89-94
13.
Anonymous. British Paediatric Surveillance Unit 12th
Annual Report, 1997-1998. London: BPSU, 1998
14.
Nicoll A, McGarrigle C, Brady AR, et al. Epidemiology
and detection of HIV-1 among pregnant women in the United
Kingdom: results from national surveillance 1988-96. BMJ
1998;316:253-258[Abstract/Full Text].
15.
Harris KA, Gilham C, Mortimer PP, Teo CG. The most
prevalent hepatitis C virus genotypes in England and Wales are
3a and 1a. J Med Virol 1999;58:127-131[Medline].
16.
Thomas SL, Newell ML, Peckham CS, Ades AE, Hall AJ. Use
of polymerase chain reaction and antibody tests in the
diagnosis of vertically transmitted hepatitis C virus
infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect
Dis1997;16:711-719[Medline].
17.
Matsuoka S, Tatara K, Hayabuchi Y, et al. Serologic,
virologic, and histologic characteristics of chronic phase
hepatitis C virus disease in children infected by transfusion.
Pediatrics 1994;94:919-922[Abstract].
18.
Bortolotti F, Resti M, Giacchino R, et al. Hepatitis C
virus infection and related liver disease in children of
mothers with antibodies to the virus. J Pediatr
1997;130:990-993[Medline].
19.
García-Monzón C, Jara P, Fernandez-Bermejo M, et al.
Chronic hepatitis C in children: a clinical and
immunohistochemical comparative study with adult patients.
Hepatology 1998;28:1696-1701[Abstract/Full Text].
20.
Bortolotti F, Giacchino R, Vajro P, et al. Recombinant
interferon-alfa therapy in children with chronic hepatitis C.
Hepatology 1995;22:1623-1627[Abstract].
21.
Iorio R, Pensati P, Porzio S, Fariello I, Guida S,
Vegnente A. Lymphoblastoid interferon alfa treatment in
chronic hepatitis C. Arch Dis Child 1996;74:152-156[Abstract].
22
McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Schiff ER, et al. Interferon
alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin as initial.
treatment for chronic hepatitis C. N Engl J Med
1998;339:1485-1492[Abstract/Full Text].
23.
Davis GL, Esteban-Mur R, Rustgi VK, et al. Interferon
alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin for the
treatment of relapse of chronic hepatitis C. N Engl J Med
1998;339:1493-1499[Abstract/Full Text].
24.
Ramsey M, Alexander G, Robinson A, et al. A national
register of Hepatitis C Virus infections with a known date of acquisition.
Gut1998;43:209.
|