|
http://www.un.org/ecosocdev/geninfo/afrec/vol15no1/aidsmil.htm
From Africa Recovery, Vol.15# 1-2
(June 2001), page 16
UN targets
peacekeepers, combatants in war against the disease
By Michael Fleshman
It is now widely accepted that the HIV/AIDS pandemic is, as
Secretary-General Kofi Annan asserts in his report on AIDS to
the General Assembly special session, "the most
formidable development challenge of our time." World
leaders increasingly call for a "war" on the deadly
infection, and often note that the disease has killed more
people in Africa than all of the continent's recent conflicts
combined.
African
armies and UN peacekeepers are grappling with how to halt the
spread of AIDS within their ranks.
Photo: AIM / Santos Finiosse
But there is strong evidence that war itself is a factor in
the rapid spread of the virus in Africa. Conflict brings
economic and social dislocation, notes the Joint UN Programme
on AIDS (UNAIDS), including the forced movement of refugees
and internally displaced people and resulting loss of
livelihoods, separation of families, collapse of health and
education services, and dramatically increased instances of
rape and prostitution. All this contributes to conditions for
the rapid spread of HIV and other infectious diseases.
Military personnel, too, risk contracting or spreading the
fatal illness, whether deployed as belligerents or
peacekeepers.
On 10 January 2000 the UN Security Council focused
international attention on the links between conflict and the
disease during an unprecedented debate on the threat of
HIV/AIDS to Africa. The Council followed its first-ever
consideration of a health issue with the adoption of
Resolution 1308 in July, declaring HIV/AIDS "a risk to
stability and security" and requesting Mr. Annan to
strengthen AIDS education and prevention training for
peacekeeping personnel through the UN Department of
Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO). Addressing the Security
Council's fourth meeting on HIV/AIDS in January 2001, the
executive director of UNAIDS, Dr. Peter Piot, applauded the
sustained attention: "The simple fact that the Security
Council regards AIDS as a significant problem sends a powerful
message," he said. "The Council now regards support
for the global fight against AIDS as among its core
business."
Uncertain impact
The degree to which conflict contributes to the spread of
HIV remains uncertain. The conditions which increase the risk
of HIV infection in war zones also make it difficult to
collect accurate information about infection rates or identify
patterns of transmission. The limited data available, however,
is alarming. A study of Nigerian troops returning from
peacekeeping operations in West Africa, for example, conducted
by the non-governmental Civil-Military Alliance to Combat
HIV/AIDS (CMA), found infection rates more than double that of
the country overall. Significantly, the study also found that
a soldier's risk of infection doubled for each year spent on
deployment in conflict regions -- suggesting a direct link
between duty in the war zone and HIV transmission. (See graph)
Part of the problem, DPKO Medical Unit head Dr. Christen
Halle told Africa Recovery, is that conflict tends to
bring together two groups at very high risk of HIV infection
-- commercial sex workers and 15-24-year-old men. "Among
refugees and displaced people it is common for the number of
commercial sex workers to increase because women feel they
have no other way to keep their families alive."
A similarly risky dynamic, he said, occurs among soldiers.
"Military culture tends to exaggerate male behaviour,"
he explained, by removing thousands of young men in their
sexual prime from the behavioural constraints of family and
community, inculcating a sense of risk-taking and
invincibility, and promoting aggression and toughness as the
male ideal -- attitudes that extend to sexual behaviour and
often lead to contact with commercial sex workers.
A study of Dutch soldiers on a 5-month peacekeeping mission
in Cambodia found that 45 per cent had sexual contact with
prostitutes or other members of the local population during
their deployment. With 18 violent conflicts, tens of thousands
of troops in the field and some 8 million refugees and
internally displaced people, Dr. Halle noted, it would be
surprising if war were not a major factor in the spread
of HIV in Africa. "There is a whole context [in combat
areas] which contributes to the spread of infectious diseases,
including sexually transmitted diseases like HIV."
High infection rates
The behaviour of the Dutch contingent in Cambodia lends
statistical weight to a truism of military life: that for as
long as there have been wars and young men to fight them,
soldiers have found opportunities for sex and, inevitably, for
the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases. Until very
recently such illnesses were considered among the least of a
soldier's worries -- often handled with "a wink and a
nod" by local commanders and a strong dose of antibiotics
from the medics. But amid evidence that infection rates for
the AIDS virus are soaring among African military and police
personnel, African governments, the UN and the international
community are taking a closer look at the link between the
uniformed services and AIDS, and are expanding education and
prevention programmes.
Even in peacetime, UNAIDS estimates, HIV rates are 2-5
times higher among soldiers than for the populace as a whole.
During operational deployment in conflict areas, infection
rates among military personnel can be as much as 50 times
higher than among civilians back home. When CMA first began
working with African military leaders in 1993 to develop HIV
education and prevention programmes, said CMA Associate
Director Dr. Rodger Yeager, the usual response was denial.
"For years we were told that AIDS was only a problem for
homosexuals and drug addicts in the West," he said.
"It was only when AIDS began to degrade readiness"
-- the ability of an army to put forces in the field with the
training, manpower and equipment to accomplish its mission --
"that the high command stopped denying they had a problem
and started asking 'what can we do?'"
For soldiers and police already infected with HIV, the
answer is very little. African militaries, like the states
they defend, lack the resources to provide the afflicted with
life-saving medications. Indeed, said Dr. Yeager, while almost
all African militaries have adopted model "best
practice" policies to provide troops with voluntary
testing and counseling, few can afford to actually provide
such services. Nor is there any guarantee that individual
soldiers would step forward for voluntary testing, given the
stigma that still surrounds the disease in many countries and
the danger of dismissal from the armed services if tested
positive.
African military leaders and the international community
have focused instead on preventing the illness, developing HIV
education and prevention materials for inclusion in existing
military training programmes. In Uganda, President Yoweri
Museveni told the African Development Forum in December (see Africa
Recovery January 2001), the military has a strict policy
of non-discrimination against HIV-positive soldiers. The
former guerrilla commander, who is widely credited for
Uganda's success in halving the country's rate of new
infections, stressed that infected personnel are kept in the
military and assigned less strenuous duties until they become
too ill to serve.
A few other African countries already are beginning to
focus some of their limited resources on HIV education for the
military. In February, Burkina Faso's defence and health
ministers met with the top armed forces officers to agree on a
plan of action against HIV/AIDS in the military, as one
component of the government's national anti-AIDS programme.
This followed earlier, confidential studies on the extent and
nature of the epidemic within the army. The plan of action
provides for:
-- reducing the rate of new infections among soldiers by 5
per cent annually through educational and preventive measures;
-- ensuring that new recruits are HIV-negative;
-- voluntary, anonymous and confidential testing of
military personnel;
-- counseling and the provision of generic medications to
ill soldiers;
-- social and economic assistance to the families and
survivors of ill soldiers.
During 2001, the total cost of the plan is estimated at CFA
178 mn (about $250,000), with the funding coming from the UN
Development Programme, World Bank, a dozen bilateral donors
and several national anti-AIDS organizations. Col. Ali Traoré,
the armed forces commander, pledged that the fight against
AIDS would henceforth feature in the annual defence plan.
In other countries, bilateral assistance to African
military organizations also has begun to arrive. In October,
for example, the US Department of Defence launched a $10 mn
Leadership and Investment in Fighting an Epidemic (LIFE)
project to assist its African military partners in HIV
prevention. According to LIFE Policy Director David Hamon, the
US effort is focused on "training the trainers" in
HIV prevention, providing technical assistance in the
development of ongoing training methods and underwriting
research on the prevalence and transmission of HIV in the
uniformed services.
Are peacekeepers spreading HIV?
The policies and attitudes of member states, particularly
those of the major troop contributors, are central to the UN's
own efforts to combat HIV among peacekeeping personnel. Troop
contributing states are responsible for the training and
outfitting of the soldiers they make available to the UN, and
DPKO can advise -- but not dictate to -- member states about
their HIV/AIDS programmes. The issue has grown in significance
amid concerns that the UN itself may be an unwitting agent for
the spread of the virus around the world. "I regret to
say," the former US Ambassador to the UN, Richard
Holbrooke, told the Security Council in January 2000,
"that AIDS is being spread, among other people, by
peacekeepers."
While researchers agree that Mr. Holbrooke's statement is
almost certainly true, a lack of data makes it impossible to
accurately gauge the severity of the problem. Only a handful
of cases have been publicly documented, and the most reliable
way to measure the risk -- mandatory testing of personnel
before and after deployment abroad -- is favoured by only a
few countries.
The concern is justified: "We are huge movers of young
people across borders and between continents," Dr. Halle
noted. "Some come from non-endemic countries for
deployment in endemic areas. Others come from endemic
countries to non-endemic areas. It is a huge concern of ours
that the legacy of the
UN not be that of bringing the virus into the local
environment. The legacy to the country providing the
peacekeepers should not be to have them bring the HIV virus
back home."
The principle objection to mandatory testing of
peacekeepers, he explained, is on human rights grounds.
"We cannot force a person to take a test that would
exclude him or her from their chosen profession. Until we have
a guarantee from troop contributors that the soldier found
HIV-positive will not be discriminated against, we will find
it very hard to change the policy."
Current DPKO policy as established by the General Assembly
is to strongly encourage member states to offer voluntary and
confidential counseling and testing (VCCT) to peacekeeping
personnel, and encourage troop contributing countries to
strengthen HIV/AIDS education and prevention courses in
national military training programmes.
One of the biggest obstacles to voluntary testing, however,
is cost. "Africans are the most vocal about the need for
[voluntary] testing, but also that testing is expensive,"
said Dr. Halle. "They have the will to do it. They have
the policy to do it. But they do not have the financial means
to do it." There has been some indication that
industrialized countries are willing to underwrite the cost of
VCCT by the UN, but even then, said Dr. Halle, there are
serious human rights and ethical issues: "It is important
in a way that the results belong to us," and not the
soldier's government, he asserted. "Because then we can
oversee the way we use it so that the results are not used to
discriminate.... The confidentiality issue is important
here." Like many of the issues surrounding HIV testing,
however, there is no consensus among member states about UN
testing of peacekeepers. Some countries have reportedly
insisted in preliminary discussions that any future HIV test
results be made available to the soldier's government.
Focus on prevention
While the debate over testing continues, the UN is greatly
expanding its education and prevention programmes among both
civil and military members of peace missions. On the eve of a
19 January 2001 Security Council meeting, UNAIDS and the
peacekeeping department initialed a cooperation agreement
formalizing a joint effort to "develop the capacity of
peacekeepers to become advocates and actors for awareness and
prevention of HIV transmission." The existing 50-page
DPKO booklet on HIV/AIDS will be simplified and released as a
pocket card to every peacekeeping soldier. The card will be
printed not just in the UN's official languages but in the
languages of all major troop-contributing states, and tailored
to the cultural norms and sensibilities of the readers.
In line with the recommendations of a UNAIDS experts
meeting on HIV and peacekeeping in Stockholm last December
(see box, page 19), regional centres, including two in Africa,
will be established to encourage greater cooperation among
countries. Dr. Halle, as DPKO's chief medical officer, has
been designated the focal point for all DPKO efforts to combat
the disease. All future UN peace missions will include a
similar HIV/AIDS focal point to ensure that HIV awareness and
prevention is integrated into all aspects of peacemaking and
post-conflict peace-building, that programmes reach mission
personnel and humanitarian workers, and that cooperation with
local and international civil society organizations is
enhanced. Condom distribution has been greatly increased,
available not just in the medical tent, but wherever soldiers
congregate -- in the bathrooms, dining halls, bars and
recreational facilities. The first test of the new approach
began in Sierra Leone in March.
Changing attitudes
For Dr. Halle, the real challenge of reducing HIV in UN
ranks comes not from the difficulty of developing culturally
appropriate training materials, but in changing the attitudes
that lead to unsafe and unacceptable behaviour -- particularly
towards women and children. For that reason, Dr. Halle noted,
DPKO's HIV/AIDS initiative is guided as much by Security
Council Resolution 1325 emphasizing the rights of women and
children in conflict as it is by Resolution 1308 on HIV and
conflict. Rape and prostitution are often seen as inevitable
consequences of war, he observed, "but they shouldn't be.
These things should be no more tolerated in war than they are
in peacetime."
By changing attitudes, he said, DPKO hopes not just to
change the behaviour of peacekeeping troops in the mission
area, "but to make them activists and advocates to stop
the spread of HIV when they get back home. We are trying to
develop responsible peacekeepers -- responsible not only in
the way they handle their weapons and their direct tasks as
peacekeepers, but responsible also in the way of handling
their relationship to the population in the mission area and
back home."
In the struggle to change attitudes, Dr. Halle said the
UN's greatest allies are the religious leaders who accompany
their troops into the field. For all the differences in
culture, policy and approach, he concluded, there is a
standard of decency and behaviour common to all humanity.
"I do not expect a Muslim imam to promote the use of
condoms. Nor do I expect a Catholic padre to do that. But what
I have every right to expect, and where they do comply, is in
talking about how you treat the people around you, especially
the most vulnerable, the women and children. If you do that
within the context of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, within the context of global ethics, then you do
something to contain the epidemic."
|
****Box 1****
"Advocates and
actors" against AIDS
From 11-13 December 2000, the Joint UN Programme on
AIDS (UNAIDS) convened a group of experts in Stockholm
to review current DPKO procedures to combat the disease
and recommend improvements. Peacekeeping personnel
should be understood as "advocates and potential
actors" in the fight against HIV/AIDS, the group
declared, and all UN policies should be geared toward
equipping them for that role. Key recommendations
include:
Training: The UN must develop minimum
standards for pre-deployment training on HIV/AIDS for
use by troop-contributing countries and UN training
personnel. The number of UN Training Assistance Teams
must be increased to reflect increased peacekeeping
deployments with emphasis on "training the
trainers." Education and training for mission
personnel should continue during and after deployment.
Codes of conduct: The UN should encourage the
development of updated and enforceable codes of conduct
for troops, governing all aspects of contact with
civilian populations and emphasizing HIV/AIDS
prevention. Mission commanders should be empowered to
repatriate peacekeepers in gross violation of the code.
Testing: In light of the complexity of the
issue, the executive director of UNAIDS and the
under-secretary-general for peacekeeping operations
should urgently establish a senior expert panel to
analyze and develop a comprehensive proposal on the
issue of HIV testing.
|
[
Back to Volume15
#1-2 Table of Contents ] [back to Africa
Recovery home ]
[ New
Releases ] [ Magazine
- Current/Past issues ] [ Index
/ Search ] [ About
us ]
[ UN Home ] [ UN
News ] [ UN
Key Reports ] [ UN
Africa Links ]
Material from this article may be freely reproduced, with
attribution to
"Africa Recovery, United Nations".
We would appreciate a copy of the reproduction.
Africa Recovery
Room S-931
United Nations
New York, NY 10017 USA
Tel: (212) 963-6857
Fax: (212) 963-4556
Email: africa_recovery@un.org
|