|
|
|
Red
Cross violated blood safety rules
http://www.msnbc.com/
|
|
|
|
FDA:
Agency may have released unsafe blood to hospitals
|
|
ASSOCIATED
PRESS
|
|
WASHINGTON,
Dec. 20 — The
American Red Cross may have released tainted blood
to hospitals, the government said Friday,
reporting more than 200 violations of federal
blood safety rules in its battle to get the Red
Cross to improve the quality of its blood
operation.
|
‘The
blood supply is not as safe as it should be. I am
troubled by apparent lapses in blood safety.’
— MARK
MCCLELLAN
FDA
Commissioner
|
|
THE FOOD and Drug Administration said it was
investigating further to determine whether patients
received bad blood.
“The blood supply
is not as safe as it should be,” said FDA Commissioner
Mark McClellan. “I am troubled by apparent lapses in
blood safety.”
The Red Cross,
which provides 45 percent of the nation’s blood
supply, said it is working hard to improve safety.
SAFETY VIOLATIONS
A year ago, the FDA
went to court seeking contempt charges for 10 years of
Red Cross safety violations. Friday’s preliminary
report on safety at the Red Cross biomedical
headquarters suggests the problems have not been fixed,
McClellan said, suggesting they point to “a culture
willing to accept noncompliance.”
|
|
Specifically, the FDA alleges that some Red Cross
employees were instructed to skip required safety steps,
and others altered records, to allow release of blood
that had failed safety testing.
In addition, the
Red Cross failed to screen out some people who were not
supposed to give blood, the FDA said. It was unclear
what happened to the units these people donated, the
agency said.
More than 1,000
units of blood were unaccounted for, it said.
The FDA emphasized
that anyone who needs a blood transfusion should get
one, because the risk of forgoing a medical procedure is
much higher than the risk of getting bad blood. The
agency also noted that people who donate blood face no
risk.
The Red Cross
acknowledged problems and promised to fix them.
“The Red Cross
understands more work needs to be done to further
strengthen our processes and procedures, and we are
fully committed to working collaboratively with the FDA
to enhance our systems,” Remesh Thadani, who heads
biomedical services, said a statement Friday.
More than 200
individual violations were identified, the FDA said.
Among them:
Lack
of management control and quality assurance oversight.
Required testing steps were not always documented, and
some employees reported being told to skip required
steps.
Data
integrity: Employees were alleged to have changed
records to indicate that flagged blood was safe.
Failure
to correct deviations from previous inspections,
including failure to follow standard operating
procedures.
Release
of unsuitable products. Donors in one Red Cross region
who are found unsuitable are supposed to be listed in a
donor deferral registry. They were not, and some went on
to donate in other regions. In some cases, the FDA does
not know what happened to their donated blood.
It was the first
inspection of the Red Cross headquarters since last
December, when the government asked a federal judge to
hold the Red Cross in contempt for repeated violations
of blood safety regulations, including shipment of
contaminated blood.
CHARGES DATE BACK 16 YEARS
In court, the FDA
charged cited “persistent and serious violations”
dating back 16 years and continuing despite a 1993
federal court order requiring improvements.
|
|
A year ago, the Red Cross vowed to fight the FDA.
After getting a new director this summer, however, the
two sides entered negotiations toward a settlement. The
Red Cross said Friday it is making substantial progress;
the FDA would not characterize the status of the talks.
The Red Cross
refused to respond to specific allegations. But in a
pre-emptive move, Red Cross officials had gathered
reporters early this week to explain improvements made
in recent months.
They said they have
hired 175 people to work on quality and vowed better
training for employees and improved computer systems
that would be less prone to human error.
The Red Cross also
has moved to an electronic blood donor record. In the
past, some blood banks accepted blood from people who
had not answered questions about the risk of HIV
infection or who had answered “yes” to questions
about high-risk behavior. Under the new system, people
who leave these questions blank or answer “yes” will
not be allowed to donate.
The Red Cross also
displayed a chart demonstrating that the number of FDA
violations had fallen over the past several years to
about 100 in 2001. With Friday’s inspection, more than
200 have been identified for 2002.
© 2002
Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|
|
|
|