Click a topic below for an index of articles:





Financial or Socio-Economic Issues


Health Insurance



Institutional Issues

International Reports

Legal Concerns

Math Models or Methods to Predict Trends

Medical Issues

Our Sponsors

Occupational Concerns

Our Board

Religion and infectious diseases

State Governments

Stigma or Discrimination Issues

If you would like to submit an article to this website, email us at for a review of this paper


any words all words
Results per page:

“The only thing necessary for these diseases to the triumph is for good people and governments to do nothing.”


High-Income Americans Opt Out of High-Cost Health Insurance

As health insurance premiums continue to rise, more and more people are opting to take their chances and go without. Of the 41 million Americans currently uninsured, the largest portion is made up of the working poor, but those with high-incomes are quickly joining in, as growth in uninsured wealthy and poor rose almost equally last year.

Reasons why higher-income individuals decide against health insurance range from not wanting to pay the extra expense or getting laid off to not being able to find a policy once sick or being healthy and not seeing a need for it.

Also, those who are self-employed or just retired can have a hard time getting insured as coverage in the individual market is often more expensive and harder to come by than coverage under an employer group.

Economists note that the increase of higher-income people without insurance could have a positive effect on the health care system. Where this was once considered a lower-class problem, the need for a health insurance reform is becoming a more widespread issue. This could fuel debate on the issue, which fell largely out of the public eye after a health reform proposal failed to be passed in 1994.


However, experts say that there are individual and societal consequences to going without health insurance. Individuals may not get needed medical care and run the risk of bankruptcy. In cases where people can afford insurance but choose not to buy it, they create a societal expense if they go to a public hospital for emergency care, as law mandates that hospitals treat anyone who comes into an emergency room, regardless of their financial situation. Additionally, this reduces the number of healthy people with insurance, which can cause rates to increase overall.

Employers are also affected by rising insurance costs, and if rates continue to go up, many employers may stop offering coverage; many employers are already passing on higher costs to employees.

Several proposals have been made to address insurance concerns. Some favor the expansion of government health programs while others support tax credits to help the lower-income uninsured buy coverage. Another option is a type of single-payer health plan, in which the government guarantees access to health care.

Others suggest making group insurance policies available to individuals or reducing restrictions on the benefits of some insurance policies so that lower-cost policies are available for catastrophic coverage. According to experts, however, finding a solution will be complicated and will be impacted by the slow economy and shortage of the national budget.


USA Today November 22, 2002


E-mail to a friend

There is clearly no question that we have an ever-increasing insurance crisis in this country for medical coverage. Please don’t let the media persuade you otherwise -- this problem is only going to get worse.

Until a radical change in the paradigm occurs, health care costs will continue to escalate. The traditional media will, of course, claim that the solution is to levy some new tax to provide these health care benefits to those that cannot afford them.

This is a prescription for disaster. Another socialized medical system will only repeat the Medicare catastrophe we already have.

The solution is to change the entire system. Unless we change the system, drug companies will continue to extract hundreds of billions of dollars from our economy with virtually no benefit -- other than making themselves richer.

Our country will become increasingly unable to support such an expense without major sacrifices by millions of people.

The solution is to redirect the spending to care that will build the health of the country and provide people with the energy to be more productive. The extra productivity would theoretically create more than enough additional wealth to pay for all the health care that we would need.

When our nation is focused on health achievement, rather than disease treatment, the total cost of providing medical care would dramatically decline, because healthy people require less medical resources.