Most resistance to Anti-HIV drugs created by good pill-taking
patients
Public release date: 20-Aug-2003
Contact: Jeff Sheehy
jsheehy@psg.ucsf.edu
415-597-8165
University of California - San Francisco
Resistance mutations to Anti-HIV medications are more likely
to occur in
patients who take most of their medications than in those who
take few
of them, according to researchers at UCSF
Resistance mutations to anti-HIV medications are more likely
to occur in
patients who take most of their medications rather than in
those who
don't, according to AIDS specialists at the University of
California,
San Francisco.
"These findings will make us rethink the argument that
life-saving
antiretroviral drugs should be denied to some populations
because poor
pill-taking behavior might accelerate the creation of
resistant
mutations of the HIV virus," said the study's lead
author, David R.
Bangsberg, MD, MPH., director of the UCSF Epidemiology and
Prevention
Interventions (EPI) Center at San Francisco General Hospital
Medical
Center (SFGHMC).
In a study of patients on antiretroviral drugs, resistance
mutations
were twice as likely to occur in patients who took 80 percent
or more of
their antiretroviral medications as they were in patients who
took 40
percent or less, according to the researchers.
"Ironically it is the 'good adherers' who developed more
resistance,
rather than the 'problem patients'," said study
co-investigator Andrew
Moss, PhD, professor of epidemiology and medicine.
"You need pressure from antiviral medications for
resistance to develop.
What is surprising is that what we typically take to be
excellent pill-
taking--80 percent of pills or better--leads to more
resistance than
occasional or inconsistent pill-taking. A caveat--this does
not mean
patients should take less of their drugs to avoid creating
resistance.
Good adherence to the antiviral regimens still is the best bet
to
prevent becoming ill or dying with HIV/AIDS. Many patients
with
excellent, even perfect, pill-taking are living longer with
resistant
virus, than those who do not take enough medication to select
for
resistant virus," said Bangsberg.
The study, appearing in the September 5, 2003, issue of AIDS,
looked at
148 participants from the Research on Access to Care in the
Homeless
(REACH) cohort, a systematic sample of HIV-positive adults
recruited
from homeless shelters, free meal programs, and low-income
single-room-
occupancy hotels in San Francisco. The participants, who
consented to
unannounced pill counts to measure adherence, were all on
anti-HIV
regimens taking three or more antiretrovirals.
Pill counts were conducted, unannounced, every three to six
weeks over a
12-month period at the participant's usual place of residence.
Blood was
drawn monthly and tested for levels of HIV virus. Blood
specimens were
also analyzed for drug resistant mutations using genotype
tests.
Participants in the top two quintiles of adherence, who took
80 percent
or more of their medications, accounted for more than half of
all new
drug resistance mutations occurring in the study. Those in the
next two
quintiles, who took between 42 percent and 78 percent of their
medications, had 35 percent of the new mutations. Only 12
percent of the
new drug resistance mutations were found in the participants
in the
lowest adherence quintile, those who took less than 41 percent
of their
medications.
Co-authors of the study are Edwin D. Charlebois, MPH, PhD,
UCSF
assistant professor of medicine, and David Guzman, senior
statistician,
both at the UCSF EPI Center at SFGHMC; Robert M. Grant, MD,
MPH,
assistant investigator at the Gladstone Institute for Virology
and
Immunology and UCSF assistant professor of medicine; Mark
Holodniy, MD,
director of The HIV Research Center at the VA Palo Alto Health
Care
System; Steven G. Deeks, MD, UCSF associate professor of
medicine in the
Positive Health Program at SFGHMC; Sharon Perry, PhD, post
doctorate
fellow in infectious diseases, Kathleen Nugent Conroy,
graduate
researcher, and Andrew R. Zolopa, MD, assistant professor of
medicine,
all in the Stanford University School of Medicine; and Richard
A. Clark,
senior public administrative analyst in the UCSF Department of
Epidemiology and Biostatistics at SFGHMC.
The study was funded by the National Institute of Mental
Health, the
University-Wide AIDS Research Program of the State of
California, the
AIDS Clinical Research Center of the University of California,
and the
UCSF/Gladstone Institute for Virology and Immunology Center
for AIDS
Research. Bangsberg received additional funding from The Doris
Duke
Charitable Foundation. Viral load test kits were donated by
Roche.
The EPI Center and the Positive Health Programs are programs
of the UCSF
AIDS Research Institute.