Sexually
Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines --- 2002
Prepared by
Kimberly A. Workowski, M.D.
William C. Levine, M.D., M.Sc.
The material in this report
was prepared for publication by the National Center for HIV,
STD, and TB Prevention, Harold W. Jaffe, M.D., Acting
Director; and the Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Prevention, Harold W. Jaffe, M.D., Acting Director.
Summary
These guidelines for the treatment of patients who have
sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) were developed by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) after
consultation with a group of professionals knowledgeable in
the field of STDs who met in Atlanta on September 26--28,
2000. Included in these updated
guidelines are new alternative regimens for scabies, bacterial vaginosis, early syphilis, and granuloma inguinale; an
expanded section on the diagnosis of genital herpes (including
type-specific serologic tests); new recommendations for
treatment of recurrent genital herpes among persons infected
with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); a revised approach to
the management of victims of sexual assault; expanded regimens
for the treatment of urethral meatal warts; and inclusion of
hepatitis C as a sexually transmitted infection. In addition,
these guidelines emphasize education and counseling for
persons infected with human papillomavirus, clarify the
diagnostic evaluation of congenital syphilis, and present
information regarding the emergence of quinolone-resistant
Neisseria gonorrhoeae and implications for treatment.
Recommendations also are provided for vaccine-preventable
STDs, including hepatitis A and hepatitis B.
Introduction
Physicians and other health-care providers play a critical
role in preventing and treating sexually transmitted diseases
(STDs). These recommendations for the treatment of STDs are
intended to assist with that effort. Although these guidelines
emphasize treatment, prevention strategies and diagnostic
recommendations also are discussed.
This report was produced through a multi-stage process.
Beginning in 2000, CDC personnel and professionals
knowledgeable in the field of STDs systematically reviewed
literature (i.e., published abstracts and peer-reviewed
journal articles) concerning each of the major STDs, focusing
on information that had become available since publication of
the 1998 Guidelines for Treatment of Sexually Transmitted
Diseases ().
Background papers were written and tables of evidence
constructed summarizing the type of study (e.g., randomized
controlled trial or case series), study population and
setting, treatments or other interventions, outcome measures
assessed, reported findings, and weaknesses and biases in
study design and analysis. A draft document was developed on
the basis of the reviews.
In September 2000, CDC staff members and invited
consultants assembled in Atlanta for a 3-day meeting to
present the key questions regarding STD treatment that emerged
from the literature reviews and the information available to
answer those questions. When relevant, the questions focused
on four principal outcomes of STD therapy for each individual
disease: a) microbiologic cure, b) alleviation of signs and
symptoms, c) prevention of sequelae, and d) prevention of
transmission. Cost-effectiveness and other advantages (e.g.,
single-dose formulations and directly observed therapy [DOT])
of specific regimens also were discussed. The consultants then
assessed whether the questions identified were relevant,
ranked them in order of priority, and attempted to arrive at
answers using the available evidence. In addition, the
consultants evaluated the quality of evidence supporting the
answers on the basis of the number, type, and quality of the
studies.
In several areas, the process diverged from that previously
described. The sections concerning adolescents and hepatitis
A, B, and C infections were developed by other CDC staff
members knowledgeable in this field. The recommendations for
STD screening during pregnancy were developed after CDC staff
reviewed the published recommendations from other
knowledgeable groups. The sections concerning early human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are a compilation of
recommendations developed by CDC staff members knowledgeable
in the field of HIV infection. The sections on hepatitis B
virus (HBV) ()
and hepatitis A virus (HAV) ()
infections are based on previously published recommendations
of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
Throughout this report, the evidence used as the basis for
specific recommendations is discussed briefly. More
comprehensive, annotated discussions of such evidence will
appear in background papers that will be published in a
supplement issue of the journal Clinical Infectious
Diseases. When more than one therapeutic regimen is
recommended, the sequence is alphabetized unless the choices
for therapy are prioritized based on efficacy, convenience, or
cost. For STDs with more than one recommended regimen, almost
all regimens have similar efficacy and similar rates of
intolerance or toxicity unless otherwise specified.
These recommendations were developed in consultation with
public- and private-sector professionals knowledgeable in the
treatment of patients with STDs. They are applicable to
various patient-care settings, including family planning
clinics, private physicians' offices, managed care
organizations, and other primary-care facilities. When using
these guidelines, the disease prevalence and other
characteristics of the medical practice setting should be
considered. These recommendations should be regarded as a
source of clinical guidance and not as standards or inflexible
rules. These guidelines focus on the treatment and counseling
of individual patients and do not address other community
services and interventions that are important in STD/HIV
prevention.
Clinical
Prevention Guidelines
The prevention and control of STDs is based on the
following five major concepts: a) education and counseling of
persons at risk on ways to adopt safer sexual behavior; b)
identification of asymptomatically infected persons and of
symptomatic persons unlikely to seek diagnostic and treatment
services; c) effective diagnosis and treatment of infected
persons; d) evaluation, treatment, and counseling of sex
partners of persons who are infected with an STD; and e)
preexposure vaccination of persons at risk for
vaccine-preventable STDs. Although this report focuses mainly
on the clinical aspects of STD control, primary prevention of
STDs begins with changing the sexual behaviors that place
persons at risk for infection. Moreover, because STD control
activities reduce the likelihood of transmission to sex
partners, treatment of infected persons constitutes primary
prevention of spread within the community.
Clinicians have a unique opportunity to provide education
and counseling to their patients. As part of the clinical
interview, health-care providers can obtain sexual histories
from their patients. Guidance in obtaining a sexual history is
available in Contraceptive Technology, 17th edition (4).
Prevention Messages
Prevention messages should be tailored to the patient, with
consideration given to the patient's specific risk factors for
STDs. Messages should include a description of specific
actions that the patient can take to avoid acquiring or
transmitting STDs (e.g., abstinence from sexual activity if
STD-related symptoms develop).
If risk factors are identified, providers should encourage
patients to adopt safer sexual behaviors. Counseling skills
(e.g., respect, compassion, and a nonjudgmental attitude) are
essential to the effective delivery of prevention messages.
Techniques that can be effective in facilitating rapport with
the patient include using open-ended questions, using
understandable language, and reassuring the patient that
treatment will be provided regardless of circumstances unique
to individual patients (including ability to pay, citizenship
or immigration status, language spoken, or lifestyle).
Many patients seeking treatment or screening for STDs
expect evaluation for all common STDs; all patients should be
specifically informed if testing for a common STD (e.g.,
genital herpes and human papillomavirus [HPV]) is not
performed.
Sexual Transmission
The most reliable way to avoid transmission of STDs is to
abstain from sexual intercourse (i.e., oral, vaginal, or anal
sex) or to be in a long-term, mutually monogamous relationship
with an uninfected partner. Counseling that encourages
abstinence from sexual intercourse is crucial for persons who
are being treated for an STD or whose partners are undergoing
treatment and for persons who wish to avoid the possible
consequences of sexual intercourse (e.g., STD/HIV and
unintended pregnancy). A more comprehensive discussion of
abstinence and the range of sexual expression is available in Contraceptive
Technology, 17th edition (4).
- Both partners should get
tested for STDs, including HIV, before initiating sexual
intercourse.
- If a person chooses to have
sexual intercourse with a partner whose infection status
is unknown or who is infected with HIV or another STD, a
new condom should be used for each act of insertive
intercourse.
Preexposure Vaccination
Preexposure vaccination is one of the most effective
methods for preventing transmission of certain STDs. For
example, because hepatitis B virus infection frequently is
sexually transmitted, hepatitis B vaccination is recommended
for all unvaccinated persons being evaluated for an STD. In
addition, hepatitis A vaccine is currently licensed and is
recommended for men who have sex with men (MSM) and illegal
drug users (both injection and non-injection). Vaccine trials
for other STDs are being conducted, and additional vaccines
may become available in the next several years.
Prevention Methods
Male Condoms
When used consistently and correctly, male latex condoms
are effective in preventing the sexual transmission of HIV
infection and can reduce the risk for other STDs (i.e.,
gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomonas). However, because
condoms do not cover all exposed areas, they are likely to be
more effective in preventing infections transmitted by fluids
from mucosal surfaces (e.g., gonorrhea, chlamydia,
trichomoniasis, and HIV) than in preventing those transmitted
by skin-to-skin contact (e.g., herpes simplex virus [HSV], HPV,
syphilis, and chancroid). Condoms are regulated as medical
devices and are subject to random sampling and testing by the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Each latex condom
manufactured in the United States is tested electronically for
holes before packaging. Rates of condom breakage during sexual
intercourse and withdrawal are low in the United States (i.e.,
approximately two broken condoms per 100 condoms used). Condom
failure usually results from inconsistent or incorrect use
rather than condom breakage.
Male condoms made of materials other than latex are
available in the United States. Although they have had higher
breakage and slippage rates when compared with latex condoms,
the pregnancy rates among women whose partners use these
condoms are similar. Non-latex condoms (i.e., those made of
polyurethane or other synthetic material) can be substituted
for persons with latex allergy.
Patients should be advised that condoms must be used
consistently and correctly to be highly effective in
preventing STDs. Patients should be instructed in the correct
use of condoms. The following recommendations ensure the
proper use of male condoms.
- Use a new condom with each
act of sexual intercourse (e.g., oral, vaginal, and anal).
- Carefully handle the condom
to avoid damaging it with fingernails, teeth, or other
sharp objects.
- Put the condom on after the
penis is erect and before any genital contact with the
partner.
- Use only water-based
lubricants (e.g., K-Y Jelly, Astroglide,
AquaLube, and glycerin) with latex condoms.
Oil-based lubricants (e.g., petroleum jelly, shortening,
mineral oil, massage oils, body lotions, and cooking oil)
can weaken latex.
- Ensure adequate lubrication
during intercourse, possibly requiring the use of
exogenous lubricants.
- Hold the condom firmly
against the base of the penis during withdrawal, and
withdraw while the penis is still erect to prevent
slippage.
Female Condoms
Laboratory studies indicate that the female condom (Reality),
which consists of a lubricated polyurethane sheath with a ring
on each end that is inserted into the vagina, is an effective
mechanical barrier to viruses, including HIV (5). With
the exception of one investigation of recurrent trichomoniasis,
no clinical studies have been completed to evaluate the
efficacy of female condoms in providing protection from STDs,
including HIV. If used consistently and correctly, the female
condom may substantially reduce the risk for STDs. When a male
condom cannot be used properly, sex partners should consider
using a female condom.
Vaginal Spermicides, Sponges, and Diaphragms
Recent evidence has indicated that vaginal spermicides
containing nonoxynol-9 (N-9) are not effective in preventing
cervical gonorrhea, chlamydia, or HIV infection (6).
Thus, spermicides alone are not recommended for STD/HIV
prevention. Frequent use of spermicides containing N-9 has
been associated with genital lesions, which may be associated
with an increased risk of HIV transmission. The vaginal
contraceptive sponge appears to protect against cervical
gonorrhea and chlamydia, but its use increases the risk for
candidiasis. In case-control and cross-sectional studies,
diaphragm use has been demonstrated to protect against
cervical gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis; however, no
cohort studies have been conducted (7). Neither vaginal
sponges nor diaphragms should be relied on to protect women
against HIV infection. The role of spermicides, sponges, and
diaphragms for preventing transmission of HIV to men has not
been evaluated. Diaphragm and spermicide use has been
associated with an increased risk of bacterial urinary tract
infection in women.
Condoms and N-9 Vaginal Spermicides
Condoms lubricated with spermicides are no more effective
than other lubricated condoms in protecting against the
transmission of HIV and other STDs. Distribution of previously
purchased condoms lubricated with N-9 spermicide should
continue provided the condoms have not passed their expiration
date. However, purchase of any additional condoms lubricated
with the spermicide N-9 is not recommended because spermicide-coated
condoms cost more, have a shorter shelf-life than other
lubricated condoms, and have been associated with urinary
tract infection in young women.
Rectal Use of N-9 Spermicides
Recent data indicate that N-9 may increase the risk for HIV
transmission during vaginal intercourse (6). Although
similar studies have not been conducted among men who use N-9
spermicide during anal intercourse with other men, N-9 can
damage the cells lining the rectum, thus providing a portal of
entry for HIV and other sexually transmissible agents.
Therefore, N-9 should not be used as a microbicide or
lubricant during anal intercourse.
Nonbarrier Contraception, Surgical Sterilization, and
Hysterectomy
Women who are not at risk for pregnancy might incorrectly
perceive themselves to be at no risk for STDs, including HIV
infection. Contraceptive methods that are not mechanical or
chemical barriers offer no protection against HIV or other
STDs. Women who use hormonal contraception (e.g., oral
contraceptives, Norplant, and Depo-Provera),
have intrauterine devices (IUDs), have been surgically
sterilized, or have had hysterectomies should be counseled
regarding the use of condoms and the risk for STDs, including
HIV infection.
STD/HIV Prevention Counseling
Interactive counseling approaches directed at a patient's
personal risk, the situations in which risk occurs, and use of
goal-setting strategies are effective in STD prevention .
One such approach --- "client-centered" HIV
prevention counseling --- involves two sessions, each lasting
15--20 minutes, and has been recommended for STD clinic
patients who receive HIV testing. In addition to prevention
counseling, certain videos and large group presentations that
provide explicit information about how to use condoms
correctly have been effective in reducing the occurrence of
additional STDs among persons at high risk, including STD
clinic patients and adolescents. Results from randomized
controlled trials demonstrate that compared with traditional
approaches to providing information, certain brief risk
reduction counseling approaches can reduce the occurrence of
new sexually transmitted infections by 25%--40% among STD
clinic patients (9).
Interactive counseling strategies can be effectively used
by most health-care providers, regardless of educational
background or demographic profile. High-quality counseling is
best ensured when clinicians are provided basic training in
prevention counseling methods and skills building approaches,
periodic supervisor observation of counseling with immediate
feedback to counselors, periodic counselor and/or patient
satisfaction evaluations, and regularly scheduled meetings of
counselors and supervisors to discuss difficult situations.
Prevention counseling is believed to be more effective if
provided in a non-judgmental manner appropriate to the
patient's culture, language, sex, sexual orientation, age, and
developmental level.
Partner Notification
Partner notification, once referred to as "contact
tracing" but more recently included in the broader
category of partner services, is the process of learning from
persons with STDs about their sexual partners and helping to
arrange for evaluation and treatment of those partners.
Providers can furnish this service directly or with assistance
from state and local health departments. The intensity of
services and the specific conditions for which such services
are offered by health agencies vary from area to area. Such
services usually are accompanied by health counseling and may
include referral of patients and their partners for other
services.
Many persons benefit from partner notification; thus,
providers should encourage their patients to make partners
aware of potential STD risk and urge them to seek diagnosis
and treatment, regardless of assistance from local health
agencies. However, whether the process of partner notification
effectively decreases exposure to STDs from a person's sexual
environment or whether it changes the incidence and prevalence
of disease is uncertain. The paucity of supporting evidence
regarding the consequences of partner notification has spurred
the exploration of alternative approaches. One such approach
is to place partner notification in the larger context of the
sexual and social networks in which people are exposed to
STDs. The underlying hypotheses are that networks have an
influence on disease transmission that is independent of
personal behaviors, that network structure is related directly
to prevalence and to underlying disease transmission dynamics,
and that network approaches provide a more powerful tool for
identifying exposed persons and other persons at risk. A
second such approach for which supporting data are being
collected is the use of patient delivered therapy for
treatment of contacts and others at risk, a technique that can
considerably expand the role of practitioners in the control
of STDs. The combination of these approaches has the potential
to provide both an intervention and its evaluative tool.
These approaches have not yet been sufficiently assessed to
warrant definitive recommendations. However, practitioners and
public health professionals should be aware of the current
potential use of these nontraditional modalities in the
prevention and control of STDs.
Reporting and Confidentiality
The accurate identification and timely reporting of STDs
are integral components of successful disease control efforts.
Timely reporting is important for assessing morbidity trends,
targeting limited resources, and assisting local health
authorities in identifying sex partners who may be infected.
STD/HIV and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) cases
should be reported in accordance with local statutory
requirements.
Syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, and AIDS are reportable
diseases in every state. HIV infection and chancroid are
reportable in many states. The requirements for reporting
other STDs differ by state, and clinicians should be familiar
with local reporting requirements. Reporting can be provider-
and/or laboratory-based. Clinicians who are unsure of local
reporting requirements should seek advice from local health
departments or state STD programs.
STD and HIV reports are kept strictly confidential. In most
jurisdictions, such reports are protected by statute from
subpoena. Before public health representatives conduct a
follow-up of a positive STD-test result, they should consult
the patient's health-care provider to verify the diagnosis and
treatment.
Special
Populations
Pregnant Women
Intrauterine or perinatally transmitted STDs can have
severely debilitating effects on pregnant women, their
partners, and their fetuses. All pregnant women and their sex
partners should be asked about STDs, counseled about the
possibility of perinatal infections, and ensured access to
treatment, if needed.
Recommended Screening Tests
- All pregnant women should be
offered voluntary HIV testing at the first prenatal visit.
Reasons for refusal of testing should be explored, and
testing should be reoffered to pregnant women who
initially declined testing. Retesting in the third
trimester (preferably before 36 weeks' gestation) is
recommended for women at high risk for acquiring HIV
infection (i.e., women who use illicit drugs, have STDs
during pregnancy, have multiple sex partners during
pregnancy, or have HIV-infected partners). In addition,
women who have not received prenatal counseling should be
encouraged to be tested for HIV infection at delivery.
- A serologic test for
syphilis should be performed on all pregnant women at the
first prenatal visit. In populations in which use of
prenatal care is not optimal, rapid plasma reagin (RPR)-card
test screening (and treatment, if that test is reactive)
should be performed at the time a pregnancy is confirmed.
Patients who are at high risk for syphilis, are living in
areas of excess syphilis morbidity, are previously
untested, or have positive serology in the first trimester
should be screened again early in the third trimester (28
weeks' gestation) and at delivery. Some states require all
women to be screened at delivery. Infants should not be
discharged from the hospital unless the syphilis serologic
status of the mother has been determined at least one time
during pregnancy and preferably again at delivery. Any
woman who delivers a stillborn infant should be tested for
syphilis.
- A serologic test for
hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) should be performed on
all pregnant women at the first prenatal visit. HBsAg
testing should be repeated late in pregnancy for women who
are HBsAg negative but who are at high risk for HBV
infection (e.g., injection-drug users and women who have
concomitant STDs).
- A test for Chlamydia
trachomatis should be performed at the first prenatal
visit. Women aged <25 years and those at increased risk
for chlamydia (i.e., women who have a new or more than one
sex partner) also should be tested during the third
trimester to prevent maternal postnatal complications and
chlamydial infection in the infant. Screening during the
first trimester might enable prevention of adverse effects
of chlamydia during pregnancy. However, evidence for
preventing adverse effects during pregnancy is lacking. If
screening is performed only during the first trimester, a
longer period exists for acquiring infection before
delivery.
- A test for Neisseria
gonorrhoeae should be performed at the first prenatal
visit for women at risk or for women living in an area in
which the prevalence of N. gonorrhoeae is high. A
repeat test should be performed during the third trimester
for those at continued risk.
- A test for hepatitis C
antibodies (anti-Hepatitis C Virus) should be performed at the first
prenatal visit for pregnant women at high risk for
exposure. Women at high risk include those with a history
of injection-drug use, repeated exposure to blood
products, prior blood transfusion, or organ transplants.
- Evaluation for bacterial
vaginosis (BV) may be conducted at the first prenatal
visit for asymptomatic patients who are at high risk for
preterm labor (e.g., those who have a history of a
previous preterm delivery). Current evidence does not
support routine testing for BV.
- A Papanicolaou (Pap) smear
should be obtained at the first prenatal visit if none has
been documented during the preceding year.
Other Concerns
Other STD-related concerns are as follows.
- HBsAg-positive women should
be reported to the local and/or state health department to
ensure that they are entered into a case-management system
and that appropriate prophylaxis is provided for their
infants. In addition, household and sex contacts of HBsAg-positive
women should be vaccinated.
- No treatment is available
for anti-Hepatitis C Virus-positive pregnant women. However, all women
found to be anti-Hepatitis C Virus-positive should receive appropriate
counseling . No vaccine is available to prevent Hepatitis C Virus
transmission.
- In the absence of lesions
during the third trimester, routine serial cultures for
HSV are not indicated for women who have a history of
recurrent genital herpes. Prophylactic cesarean section is
not indicated for women who do not have active genital
lesions at the time of delivery.
- The presence of genital
warts is not an indication for cesarean section.
- Not enough evidence exists
to recommend routine screening for Trichomonas
vaginalis in asymptomatic pregnant women.
For a more detailed discussion of these guidelines, as well
as infections not transmitted sexually, refer to the following
references: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services (10),
Guidelines for Perinatal Care (11), American
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Educational
Bulletin: Antimicrobial Therapy for Obstetric Patients (12),
ACOG Committee Opinion: Primary and Preventive Care:
Periodic Assessments (13), Recommendations for
the Prevention and Management of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections
,
Hepatitis B Virus: A Comprehensive Strategy for Eliminating
Transmission in the United States through Universal Childhood
Vaccination --- Recommendations of the Immunization Practices
Advisory Committee (ACIP) ,
Mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus (15), Hepatitis
C: Screening in pregnancy (16), American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Educational
Bulletin: Viral hepatitis in pregnancy (17), Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Screening: Joint statement of the AAP
and ACOG (18), Preventing Perinatal Transmission
of HIV (19), and the Revised Public Health
Service Recommendations for HIV Screening of Pregnant Women
These sources are not entirely consistent in their
recommendations
|