If you would like to submit an article to this website, email us at info@heart-intl.net for a review of this paper
info@heart-intl.net
Number of New Reported California AIDS Cases Increased 6% in 2002
[Jan
13, 2003]
http://www.kaisernetwork.org/
The number of new AIDS cases reported in California in 2002 increased by
6% to 4,437, after a decade of decreases, according to the state
Office of AIDS, the Los Angles Times reports. State officials attributed the increase to improved reporting
by physicians and laboratories under a new system, not to a failure of
HIV/AIDS treatments or a "resurgence" of high-risk behavior, the
Times reports (Ornstein, Los Angeles Times, 1/11).
Under the new system, launched on July 1, 2002, physicians and labs must
report new HIV cases, in addition to new AIDS cases, to the state. The
state also began to use a new alphanumeric code system, rather than the
names of HIV-positive individuals, to track new HIV cases (Kaiser
Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 7/1/02). "Many of the newly
reported AIDS cases had been diagnosed in previous years but never
reported," and they "probably were caught" because of the new HIV
reporting system, the Times reports (Ornstein, Los
Angeles Times, 1/11).
Problems with New System
However, some physicians and labs have failed to provide the state with
the information required under the new HIV reporting system, a trend
that has "hobbled" the system, the Los Angeles Times reports. The state has received reports on only a "fraction" of the
estimated number of new HIV/AIDS cases in California -- 9,155 of an
estimated 80,000 cases -- and cases "have been reported unevenly" across
the state, the Times reports. Orange County reported 829
new HIV cases for a population of three million residents; Los Angeles
County, with a population of 10 million residents, reported only 1,064
cases. Some physicians and clinics said that the use of alphanumeric
codes, rather than patient names, "hampers the new system's efficiency
and usefulness," the Times reports. "It was a bad idea
legislatively and it's a worse idea in practice," Michael Weinstein,
president of the
AIDS
Healthcare Foundation, said. However, Michael Montgomery,
director of the state Office of AIDS, said that the state expected some
problems in the first few years of the new system. "Nobody thought it
was going to be easy," he said (Ornstein, Los Angeles Times,
1/11).