Education + Advocacy = Change

Click a topic below for an index of articles:

 

New-Material

Home

Alternative-Treatments

Financial or Socio-Economic Issues

Forum

Health Insurance

Hepatitis

HIV/AIDS

Institutional Issues

International Reports

Legal Concerns

Math Models or Methods to Predict Trends

Medical Issues

Our Sponsors

Occupational Concerns

Our Board

Religion and infectious diseases

State Governments

Stigma or Discrimination Issues

If you would like to submit an article to this website, email us at info@heart-intl.net for a review of this paper
info@heart-intl.net

 

any words all words
Results per page:

“The only thing necessary for these diseases to the triumph is for good people and governments to do nothing.”

     

 

Changing the Stigma of and Levels of Awareness for Hepatitis and HIV/AIDS

by

James Hoyt and Carolyn Stevens

“An endangered society is one whose members can no longer change the stories they tell themselves. The inability to script alternative narratives—to change our stories—can be lethal.” Jerome Bruner, Acts of Meaning, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; 1990

"They deserve to die!"  "How did he get it?"  "Tom has AIDS, he must be gay."  The terms HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis are now almost interchangeable with lifestyles being gay or being a user of IV drugs; if you are positive for AIDS, you must be gay; if you are positive for Hepatitis, you must have used IV drugs.  The stigmatizations of these diseases have resulted in the isolation of, and the negative response, to being tested.  Gregory M. Herek, PhD, John P. Capitanio, PhD, and Keith F. Widaman, PhD. 1 recently conducted a long-term study that deals which the stigma associated with HIV/AIDS.

In the study it was found that the general public believes the following myths and beliefs about AIDS transmission:

o       Most people with AIDS are responsible for having their illness - 48.3%

o       People with AIDS should legally be separated from others to protect the public health - 12%

o       Beliefs about HIV transmission:

o       Being coughed on or sneezed on by someone who has the AIDS virus - 50.4%

o       Use of public toilets - 40.8%

o       Sharing a drink out of the same glass with someone who has the AIDS virus - 50.1%

These beliefs also confront those individuals who are positive for Hepatitis, although to a lesser degree.  A recent study that was conducted in Colorado reveals comparable results with the aforementioned study.  The results from this particular survey were not intended to answer questions concerning the levels of awareness instead they were meant but to show the lack of awareness of these diseases.  This is the first survey that addresses the discrepancies between known sources of transmission as well as other sources that people perceive as vectors for infection.  In addition the study will deal with the concept of acquiring either of these diseases as a matter of a personal lifestyle choice.

The alarming increase in infectious diseases over the last two decades makes it imperative that the public become better informed about questions concerning:

o                How are these diseases are contracted?

o                What are the risks?

o                How to avoid these diseases?

Unfortunately, there is an overabundance of inaccurate information, myths and erroneous beliefs on which the public have based their judgments.  Because of this, society is extremely uninformed and uneducated in relation to infectious diseases—HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis. 

Another important issue that the study on awareness was intended to accomplish was:

1)         To discover when the respondents had been exposed to the comprehension that diseases (HIV/AIDS & Hepatitis), can be transmitted by other sources, and

2)         Did the respondents' attitudes change as whether these diseases were acquired by a "Life-style Choice" or perhaps other means? 

Many people believe that there are just a few ways to acquire either of these diseases and that they occur due to specific life-style behaviors.  This is why, in constructing the survey we attempted to reveal the possibility of other sources in lieu of basic blood-to-blood or sexual preferences.  For example there is the possibility of acquiring either illness from: surgery, hemodialysis, dental work, being employed in a medical profession.  Because HIV/AIDS is often associated with a specific life-style behaviors, very little information has been released about male-to-male sex, or IV drug use.  Instead, questions have been more focused on lesser known groups, which are positive for HIV/AIDS. Such groups include: women, children, people who have acquired the illness from surgery, and many unknown reasons.

Special Term that will be used throughout the survey: "Fault Finders" are respondents who decide on "Yes" as acquiring Hepatitis as a "Life-style choice" for the First Hepatitis Choice question and then they continued to select "Yes" for the other three choice questions.  The term "Fault Finders" will be used throughout this paper to describe these respondents.

Objective

 The purpose of this study is to determine the level of awareness concerning the various sources of infection.  We wish to determine how aware students are of the various methods of transmission such as it relates to people, who are positive, as a result of a personal life-style choice or due to other circumstances.  Do they believe these diseases are a matter of "Personal Lifestyle Choice"?  One of the assumptions we concluded was that there is a much misinformation and poor awareness of the matter. 

We wanted to see what affects the "experiment" would have on changing the concept of "Personal Lifestyle Choice" issue.  The experiment consisted of using a table (similar to one that CDC has). 8   Many individuals believe that these diseases are solely contracted by direct blood-to-blood or blood-to-body fluid sources; generally people are not aware of the fact that blood is not the only potential source of these infections.  Dried blood or body fluids do have the potential of becoming an infectious vector.  We felt that once the respondents, thru their own self-awareness process of the check-off list, would realize the potential of other sources becoming means for transmission of these illnesses. Would there be a change in the response answers for the "Choice Questions" during the course of the survey?  Once the awareness over the expanded possible sources for infection occurs, would a change in attitude also occur?

Because many individuals assume that HIV/AIDS is a disease that only affects gay men, it was imperative to include other possibilities so that the respondents could reflect on other plausible groups also becoming infected with the virus.  A group of questions was put into in the AIDS section that relates to women that are positive, children under the age of 13 that are positive, individuals that are positive from medical necessity, and other people that are positive from unknown sources with little or no suggestion of their HIV/AIDS having been related to male-to-male sex or IV drug use.  We decided questions concerned all of these those groups since many people are unaware of the fact that there are really numerous causes for these infections.

After the above question another grouping of questions required that the respondents were to write down the percentage of people they believed were positive due to a "Lifestyle Choice." 

 

Methods

 A survey was conducted in Colorado using 502 respondents.  The survey was a pre-test/experiment/post-test design.  An experimental check-off list from several known sources of transmission, to include many additional phony sources (considered to be sources of infection by the general public), was used as the experimental model.  The list was chosen based on actual, as well as perceived sources for, transmission of these diseases to assist in determining what respondents consider being actual sources based upon their current limited level of knowledge/awareness. 

One of the primary objectives in this study was to determine what perception that the respondents have about people who have these diseases and how they believe that these diseases can be contracted.  We also wanted to observe if the use of the experiment (a check-off list), as well as the percentage tables, might change the respondent's concept of whether these diseases were a matter of choice or had to do with other circumstances.  The survey was designed with two sections, the first relating to Hepatitis and the second to HIV/AIDS.  The "matter of personal lifestyle choice" question was asked twice for each disease section, once at the beginning of the list and then at the end the list.  This was to determine if there was a change in the answers after the respondents had read through the source list. 

The term - "personal lifestyle choice" was used because it has been culturally associated with the negative mind-set toward theses diseases.   We felt that by using such a prejudicial statement as a "personal lifestyle choice," that if there would be a change in the responses, it would have come from a change in the attitude of the respondent.

Results

Demographics 

  • Of the total number of respondents there were 229 males (45.9%) and 270 females (54.1 %). 
  • Ethnicity consisted of African/American (2.8%), Asian/Pacific (8%), Caucasians (57.4%), European (4.6%), Hispanic/Latino (21.1%), and Native American (1.4%). 

Data Analysis for the Hepatitis section

The results of the "choice" questions are as follows

Question-9: "Do you believe that acquiring a disease such as Hepatitis is a matter of personal lifestyle choice?" was the first question that was asked prior to the Hepatitis check-off list. 

Responses for the first hepatitis choice question were:  Yes-131 (26.2%), No-239 (47.8%), Uncertain-130 (26%), and Non-responses-2 (0.3%).

Question-15: "Do you believe that acquiring a disease such as Hepatitis is a matter of “personal lifestyle choice?" was the last question asked after the Hepatitis check-off list.

Responses for the second hepatitis choice question were:  Yes-115 (26.1%), No-207 (47%), Uncertain-118 (26.8%), and Non-responses-62 (12.3%)

Question-10: "Have you ever heard of:" was asked to determine if the respondents had any knowledge of the disease Hepatitis.

 

Hepatitis A—413 (82.3%)

Hepatitis B—437 (87.1%)

Hepatitis C—373 (74.3%)

Unknown type—106 (21.1%)

No knowledge—34 (6.8

Question-11: "Do you know anyone who has been infected with:" was asked to determine if respondents personally knew of anyone who was positive. 

Hepatitis A—63 (12.5%)

Hepatitis B—82 (16.3%)

Hepatitis C—98 (19.5%)

Unknown type—50 (10%)

Members of our team felt the number of respondents who knew someone that was positive for Hepatitis C Virus – (19.5%) was significant because many of those who are positive will not disclose this information to many individuals, unless those who are positive have very close ties with each other.  Those individuals, who are positive for Hepatitis and/or HIV/AIDS, generally do not disclose such information openly with the general public. 

The list of sources for the check-off list concerning Hepatitis was based upon a frequency table that CDC (Center for Disease Control) has available for Hepatitis and the potential sources for infection. 8  

One of the problems experienced by our group, was the fact that many of the respondents would mark a box that was, beyond doubt, an obvious non-choice answer (having a manicure, surgery, or hemodialysis) yet still marked “Yes"—it is a personal life-style choice for acquiring this illness.

 

Table 1

 

Hepatitis

HIV/AIDS

 

 

Perceived Sources for Infection:

Percentage

of

Respondents

Percentage of  Fault Finders

Percentage

of

Respondents

Percentage of  Fault Finders

Breathing contaminated air*

11.0

1.8

 

 

Personal contact with an individual with Hepatitis A

32.3

9.0

 

 

Personal contact with an individual with Hepatitis B

33.7

9.2

 

 

Personal contact with an individual with Hepatitis C and other types

33.5

10.0

 

 

Personal contact with an individual with Hepatitis (unknown type)

24.5

7.0

 

 

Body piercings*

47.6

12.9

43

16.9

Blood transfusion

68.9

17.1

8.4

3

Child/employee in daycare center

16.7

3.6

4

1.2

Dental work

34.7

10.0

36.9

10.6

Employment or involvement (student or volunteer) in the field(s) of Medicine or Dentistry

29.9

7.4

 

 

22.9

 

 

7.6

Food/water of questionable quality (restaurant or other source)

31.7

7.6

 

3.4

 

1

Having a manicure

13.7

3.0

9.2

3.4

Hemodialysis

21.5

6.4

19.9

.4

International travel

19.1

5.2

6.6

3

IV drug use1

64.7

15.9

62.5

20.9

Kissing*

23.9

7.6

10.2

4

Multiple partners 1

50.0

16.3

56.6

21.7

Sexual preferences 1

48.2

14.1

58.6

19.1

Sharing another persons glass*

13.5

3.4

3.8

.4

Surgery; major, minor or dental

41.8

11.4

40.2

12.9

Tattooing

54.2

15.5

47.8

17.5

Use of a public restroom*

19.9

5.6

7.8

2.2

Acupuncture*

 

 

28.5

10.8

Having personal contact with an individual with HIV

 

 

 

22.7

 

7

Having personal contact with an individual with AIDS

 

 

 

23.1

 

7.2

Open sores, scratches or wounds exposed to bodily fluids in the work place

 

 

 

57.4

 

18.7

* Represents bogus response statements that we felt represented many of the fabricated sources for infection

1 Represents, only for the HIV/AIDS section those sources that are considered by CDC to be sources of the illness

            Various statistical tests were used, mainly to crosscheck and to verify the results of each of the tests.  We found several main predictors (statements that could be used to foretell the respondent's answers).

These values are:

o                   Multiple partners - HBV and Hepatitis C Virus

o                   International Travel - HBV and Hepatitis C Virus

o                   Personal contact with a person with Hepatitis A - Hepatitis C Virus

Question-22:   "Of those individuals who are positive for any of these diseases, what percentage of the total, which are positive do you believe, became positive by their own lifestyle or personal actions/behavior?"

o                   Hepatitis B—average 36.72% (Fault Finders - 47.21%)

o                   Hepatitis C—average 39.91% (Fault Finders - 47.63%)

o                   HIV—57.77% (Fault Finders - 64.55%)

o                   AIDS—58.69% (Fault Finders - 66.54%)

Of the questions that dealt with percentage values, the Fault Finders had a generally higher average than the other members of the survey sample.  The "Fault Finders" represent a sizable block of individuals that were very closed-minded.  They would mark boxes that were not even associated with any form of a behavior/life-style source e.g.: getting a manicure, employment in, dental work, use of a public restroom or hemodialysis.  These individuals continued to believed that acquiring either illness was a matter of a "Personal Lifestyle Choice."

Another interesting factor in reference to question #22, was during the process of taking the survey, average values for this question declined indicating the importance in educating these people and then taking notice of how the respondents were then less likely to choose "Yes" as a matter of choice.   Once the respondents' self-awareness of other potential sources of infection was realized, many changed their minds about the acquisition of these diseases being less of a "Personal Lifestyle Choice" issue.  Most average values changed during the course of the survey, except for the "Fault Finders" who believe that HIV/AIDS is a matter of a “Life-Style Choice.” 

The "Fault Finders" on the final choice question had a wider variation (standard deviation) in regards to the percentage that became positive from a life-style choice verses those who did not.  This demonstrates a sense of uncertainty and, again, the importance of education.  The ambiguity for the "Fault Finders" via their selection of "Yes" indicates, that by having learned the other potential sources of these diseases, those sources of the highest risk as well as the ones with lower probability of infection can, and does, have an impact on the perception of these diseases.

Data Analysis for the HIV/AIDS section

Question-16: "Do you believe that acquiring a disease such as HIV or AIDS is a matter of personal lifestyle choice?" was the question that was asked prior to  the HIV/AIDS check off list. 

Responses for the initial HIV/AIDS choice question were: Yes - 241 (49.9%), No - 183 (37.9%), Uncertain - 59 (12.2%) and Non-response - 19 (3.8%)

Question-24: "Do you believe that acquiring a disease such as HIV or AIDS is a matter of personal lifestyle choice?" was the question that was asked after the HIV/AIDS check off list. 

Responses for the second HIV/AIDS choice question were: Yes - 223 (47.2%), No - 173 (36.7%), Uncertain - 76 (16.1%) and Non-response - 30 (5.97%)

Both check-off lists utilized the same basic information for both Hepatitis and AIDS.  The probability of acquiring HIV/AIDS from body fluid is reduced due to the sensitivity of HIV/AIDS virus to our environment.  The virus is easily destroyed by changes in the temperature, chemical contact (10% - bleach), and others, which makes this disease a weaker virus than Hepatitis.  So many of the sources for transmission of Hepatitis are not the same as for HIV/AIDS; the primary sources are direct blood-to-blood and blood-to-body fluids,  (we were unable to locate an existing table for HIV/AIDS).  Information from CDC indicates that the primary sources for HIV/AIDS are: sexual preference, IV drug use and multiple partners.  As such, many of those sources that are needed for the transmission of Hepatitis are not the same as they are for AIDS.

 Because of this many of the sources from our check-off list were reduced as having a lower level of transmission probability which made these questions false sources of infection.

From our study, we found that the students believe that:

o                   The percentage of females who are positive — 40.9%

o                   Percentage from medical procedures who are positive —18.8%

o                   Percentage from unknown sources who are positive — 24.5%

o                   Percentage of children under the age of 13 who are positive — 14.6%

From the next question, we found that the respondents felt that the percentages from a "Lifestyle Choice" are: 

o                   HBV — 36.72%

o                   Hepatitis C Virus — 36.41%

o                   HIV — 57.77%

o                   AIDS — 58.69%

The "Fault Finders" values for this question ranged from 6.8% to 10.9% higher than the average respondents for this question.

            The main predictors for HIV were:

o                   A Public Restroom

o                   Open sores or wounds exposed to bodily fluids in the work place

o                   Multiple partners

The main predictors for AIDS were:

o                   A Public Restroom

o                   Open sores or wounds exposed to bodily fluids occurring in the work place

Taken from a long-term study that was done by Herek, Capitanio, and Widaman 1.  The results are:

o                   "Kissing someone on the cheek who has the AIDS virus" 1 — 13.3% in 1997

o                   "Sharing a drink out of the same glass with someone   who has the AIDS virus" 1 — 50.1% in 1999

o                   "Using public toilets" 1 — 40.8% in 1999

o                   "Being coughed on or sneezed on by someone who has the AIDS virus — 50.4% in 1999" 1

Conclusions:

Pretest – experiment - Posttest sections of the survey format did show a change in how the respondents answered the "Choice Questions" for Hepatitis: however, the result for HIV/AIDS had a significant value using the "McNamar Test."  The result for Hepatitis was not as strong as for HIV/AIDS, however we felt that the reason could be that fewer of the respondents were familiar with all of the consequences and causes for Hepatitis.  By the end of the survey, respondents had changed their attitude/perception for HIV/AIDS at a significant level.  They were deemed less likely to consider HIV/AIDS as a result of a "Lifestyle Choice" issue.

The study also exposes many of the inconsistencies in perceptions of the acquisition of these two illnesses.  The section on HIV/AIDS indicates a higher level in awareness as to the main sources for transmission of the diseases and the ranking of the perceived sources of transmission.  This is not shown for the Hepatitis awareness level because of the broad range of ranking levels and misconceptions of transmission of the disease.  This indicates a lack of understanding about the disease itself.

Because many of the inconsistencies from the sources of transmission for both diseases, respondents selected sources that are clearly not a matter of a "Lifestyle Choice" issue, e.g. international travel, blood transfusion, surgery, etc. They would still select "Yes" for the choice questions.  There was no indication of a strong association between many of the answers in the lists for possible sources of infection.  This shows that some underlying/unknown variables for choosing a "Yes" answer.  

The "Fault Finders" represent a strong influence for all four "Choice Questions."  The "Fault Finders" represented 100% for the Hepatitis section of the survey while they represent 58.7% of the total respondents who believe that acquiring the disease HIV/AIDS is a matter of a "Personal Lifestyle Choice."

According to study conducted by Bruce and Jo Phelan this is an indication of "Conceptualized Stigma” 2.  In order for stigma to occur they state that the following components need to converge:

1)                 "People distinguish and label human differences" 2

a)                 "When we turn attention to medical conditions we note that they vary dramatically in the extent to which they or their attributes are selected for social salience" 2

b)                 "An important part of any thorough study of the stigma associated with different diseases" 2

2)                 "Dominant cultural beliefs link labeled persons to undesirable characteristics—to negative stereotypes" 2

a)                 "Human differences are linked to undesirable attributes" 2

b)                 "Associating human differences with negative attributes" 2

3)                 "Dominant cultural beliefs link labeled persons are placed in distinct categories so as to accomplish some degree of separation of 'us' from 'them'" 2

a)                 "Us from Them attitude" 2

b)                 "People speak of persons as being epileptics or schizophrenics rather than describing them as having epilepsy or schizophrenia.  This is revealing regarding this component of stigma because it is different for other diseases.  A person has cancer, heart disease or the flu—they are one of 'us,' a person who just happens to be beset by a serious illness. "  2

4)                 "Labeled persons experience status loss and discrimination that lead to unequal outcomes" 2

a)                 "Status loss and discrimination"  2

b)                 "When people are labeled, set apart and linked to undesirable characteristics, a rationale is constructed for devaluing, rejecting, and excluding them." 2 

"Among the US public AIDS stigma has been manifested as anger and other negative feelings towards PWAs (People with AIDS), the belief that they deserve their illness, avoidance and ostracism, and support for coercive public policies that threaten their human rights.  Stigmatizing attitudes are strongly correlated with misunderstanding the mechanisms of HIV transmission and overestimating the risks of casual contact, and with negative attitudes toward social groups disproportionately affected by the epidemic, especially