If you would like to submit an article to this website, email us at info@heart-intl.net for a review of this paper
info@heart-intl.net
DOES THE MEDIA REPORT THE NEWS OR CREATE
THE NEWS?
http://www.cinemaniastigma.com/
On
November 16th,
1999, in mid-Manhattan, an innocent young woman was savagely struck on
the head with a brick by an unknown assailant. Although no one knew who
the assailant was, and no suspects had yet been arrested, assumptions
were made, based upon pre-conceived notions, and all of the local papers
alleged that the perpetrator had to be a "mentally-ill", homeless
person. In fact, the New York Daily News front-page headline read: "Get
the Violent Crazies off Our Streets", including a two-page editorial
entitled "Hospitalize the Deranged" which issued this ominous warning
that echoed with a foreboding sense of impending doom:
"In our newfound complacency, we have forgotten a particular kind of
violence to which we are still prey. The violence of the
mentally-ill. The dangerous ones pursued by personal demons
and likely to strike out in viciousness or fear. Anytime. Anywhere. It's
time to end the madness. It's time to get the dangerously deranged off
the streets for their sake and ours... There are crazies among us. Some
of them are dangerous. A few of them are murderous. Get them off the
street. Now!" (11/19/99)
Not only did this hysteria-inducing front-page headline bluntly imply
that "the mentally-ill" are violent and crazy, but more disturbingly, it
boldly implied that New York City's streets are reserved for a select
few ("OUR streets", versus, "the streets"). As a result New York City's
mayor subsequently ordered a full-scale round-up of the city's homeless
and arrested
all those who refused to enter the city's shelters. Even homeless people
who had never had a history of "mental illness" became victims of this
media-driven frenzy. When the assailant was eventually captured (and
convicted), and it was discovered that he had never been diagnosed with
or treated for a mental illness, and wasn't even homeless, none of the
papers retracted their allegations nor offered an apology. In fact, the
exact opposite took place. More media headlines began to appear
demanding forced hospitalizations and forced treatment of "the
mentally-ill". Eight months later a similar attack took place in
Manhattan involving another young woman named Tiffany Goldberg
which prompted a similar response from the media. And once again "the
mentally-ill" were criminalized. Only this time when the alleged
perpetrator, Bently Grant (who WAS homeless and DID have a diagnosis of
"mental illness") was arrested, the front page headline screamed "We
Got Him!"
(7/21/00). Not only was there a so-called confession, but there were
even so-called eyewitnesses who placed Bently at the scene of the crime
even though he insisted that he was inside a record store at the time of
the assault. And in typical fashion a New York Post editorial
(reminiscent of the Daily News editorial "Hospitalize the
Deranged"), had these inciteful words to share about people labeled
mentally-ill:
"Of all the
billions that liberalistas have lovingly lavished on healthy men and
women in the form of welfare checks, the same smug folks have been
particularly stingy when it comes to the mentally-ill. You may call them
wackos, crazies,
nut cases, weirdos, but what we are really talking about are people who
are in seriously emotional mayhem. For more than thirty years, the
liberal agenda was to give bums a free ride rather than to pay for the
care of people who are in a pathetic state of near or absolute insanity.
So now these poor craven souls pick up pieces of concrete and bash in
the skulls of innocents. Don't walk around the street minding your own
business, because some sad nut might think that you're Satan and a brick
will be part of your cranium."
But sure
enough charges against Bently Grant had to be dropped when the security
camera of Virgin Records store placed him inside the store at the exact
same time that the assault took place. Is truth in reporting
no longer a marketable standard? And is sensationalism at any cost the
new standard on which conventional media prides itself?
"Today, a single
bizarre incident triggers an avalanche of news bulletins, special
reports, live coverage and round-the-clock talk shows. "Experts" are
paraded before anxious viewers to proclaim that the incident is not
merely an isolated act, but the beginning of a terrifying new wave of
crime." (Alternative Press, Volume 6, No. 2)