|
Sharing of Drug Preparation Equipment as a Risk Factor for Hepatitis C
American Journal of Public Health 43
January 2001, Vol. 91, No.1
MD
Holly Hagan, PhD, Hanne Thiede, DVM, MPH, Noel S. Weiss, MD, Dr
PH, Sharon G. Hopkins, DVM; MPH, Jeffrey s. Duchin, MD,and
E. Russell Alexande1; MD Holly Hagan, PhD, Hanne Thiede, DVM, MPH, Noel
S. Weiss, MD, DrPH, Sharon G. Hopkins, DVM; MPH, Jeffrey
s. Duchin, MD,
Holly Hagan, Hanne Thiede, Sharon G. Hopkins, and
Jeffrey S. Duchin are with the Seattle-King County Department ofPublic
Health, Seattle, Wash. Holly Hagan, Hanne Thiede, Noel S. Weiss, Sharon
G. Hopkins, and E. Russell Alexander are with the Department of
Epidemiology and Jeffrey S. Duchin is with the Division of Allergy and
Infectious Dis- eases, University ofWashington Seattle.
Requests for reprints
should be sent to Holly Hagan, PhD, {>ublic Health-Seattle and King
County, 106 Prefontaine Place South, Seattle, WA 98104 (e-mail:
holly.hagan@metrokc.gov).
This brief was accepted
May 15,2000
Abstract
Objectives: This study investigated the sharing of drug preparation
equipment as a possible route of hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C Virus) transmission.
Methods:
Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion was measured in a cohort of 317 injection drug users
who tested negative for Hepatitis C Virus antibody at recruitment.
Results:
Cumulative Hepatitis C Virus incidence was 16.7% per year. Among those who did not
share syringes, Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion was associated with sharing drug
cookers and filtration cotton (adjusted risk ratio = 5.9%; 95%
confidence interval = 1.1, 31.7); 54% of Hepatitis C Virus infections in injection
drug users who did not share syringes were attributable to cooker/cotton
sharing.
Conclusion: Among injection drug users who do not share syringes, an
important proportion of Hepatitis C Virus infections may be attributed to
cooker/cotton sharing. (Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 42-46)
Hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C Virus) infection is very common among injection drug
users. Studies of injection drug users in regions with a long- standing
pattern of endemic injection drug use have reported prevalences of Hepatitis C Virus
antibody in the range of 65% to 90%, even where HIV prevalence is quite
low. 1-5 The majority of Hepatitis C Virus infections become chronic, resulting in a
large reservoir of Hepatitis C Virus infection among injection drug users.6 Incidence
of Hepatitis C Virus infection in previously uninfected injection drug users ranges
from 10 to 30 per 100 person-years at risk.I-4.7-9 Prior studies have
not observed a consistent pattern of risk associated with sex, duration
or recency of injecting, or participation in a syringe exchange
program.3.4.7.10.11 Three incidence studies noted an association between
Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion and use of potentially contaminated syringes,3.8.9
but in all but ones the association was weak after control for other
factors. Clearly, a great deal remains to be learned about the
determinants and prevention of Hepatitis C Virus infections in injection drug users.
Among the unexplored areas of Hepatitis C Virus research is the importance to
transmission of the shared use of drug preparation equipment in the
absence of injection with a contaminated syringe. Because the prevalence
of syringe sharing has declined since the appearance of HIV/AIDS,12
viral transmission associated with sharing equipment used to prepare
drugs for injection may have risen in importance. In this study, we
examined the risk of Hepatitis C Virus transmission in relation to the sharing of
cookers used to melt the drug into an injectable liquid, of cotton used
to filter out particles as the drug is drawn into the syringe, and of
water used to rinse the syringe. Injection with a syringe previously
used by another injector, and use of a syringe to divide drug doses
between users (backloading},13 were also evaluated as potential means of
Hepatitis C Virus transmission.
Methods
Subjects were enrolled in a cohort study of health consequences and risk
behaviors associated with injection drug use (the RAVEN Study)!
Recruitment occurred between June 1994 and May 1997 in 9 different
locations in the Seattle area; a random-numbers table was used to select
the nth client from among those present at each location. Eligibility
criteria included having injected an illicit drug in the previous year,
being English or Spanish speaking, being 14 years or older, and not
being already enrolled in the study. After providing written consent to
participate, subjects completed an interviewer-administered
questionnaire and a blood draw. Follow-up I year later included an
interview that asked about behavior during the follow-up period and a
second blood specimen. Blood was tested for Hepatitis C Virus antibody with a
third-generation enzyme immunoassay (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Ill).
Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion was determined by the appearance of Hepatitis C Virus antibody in a
previously seronegative individual. Details of RAVEN methods are
available elsewhere! Study protocols were approved by an institutional
review board.
Baseline characteristics and risk behaviors during the follow-up period
were evaluated as risk factors for Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion by cumulative
incidence. 14 The questionnaire asked about injection with a syringe
previously used by another person, use of a cooker or cotton after
another person had used it, use of rinse water another person had used,
and use of a syringe to divide drugs. Throughout this re- port, these
behaviors are referred to as syringe sharing, cooker and cotton sharing,
sharing rinse water, and backloading, respectively. The magnitude of the
association between these injection behaviors and Hepatitis C Virus infection was
estimated by means of the risk ratio and its 95% confidence interval.
Shared use of cooker and of cotton were evaluated together, because
among those who did not share syringes, all of the Hepatitis C Virus seroconverters
who shared cotton also shared a cooker.
Stratified analysis was carried out to separate the large effect of
syringe sharing from the effect of other injection behavior. Logistic
regression was used to estimate the risk of Hepatitis C Virus infection associated
with injection risk behavior among those who did not report sharing
syringes during the follow-up period; this analysis obtained estimates
of the association adjusted for confounding factors (adjusted risk
ratio). Frequency of injection at the baseline interview was included in
the model because it met databased criteria for confounding. 15 The
attributable risk percentage is the proportion of disease in persons
with a given behavior that is due to that behavior. 16 The attributable
risk percentage was estimated by standard methodsi6 and as shown in
Table 3. It was calculated for behaviors that were statistically
significantly associated with Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion, since some fraction of
disease could reason- ably be attributed to them. The attributable risk
percentage in the underlying injection drug user population (population
attributable risk percentage) was also calculated by standard
methodology. 16
Results
In a multiple logistic regression model that included only 123 injection
drug users who injected but did not share syringes during follow-up, the
adjusted risk ratio for cooker and cotton sharing was 5.9 (95% CI=
1.1,31.7). For injection drug users who shared rinse water or backloaded,
risk of Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion was not significantly to Hepatitis C Virus positive during
the follow-up period ( 16.7% ). The risk of Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion was lower
for African Americans than for others, but it was not associated with
sex, age, or homelessness. Injection drug users whose first injection
was in the previous 2 years, and those who reported at their enrollment
interview that they injected at least once every day, were relatively
more likely to become infected with Hepatitis C Virus
Also shown in Table I, those who re- ported no injections during
follow-up had the lowest risk of Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion. All 3
seroconverters who did not inject during follow-up reported injecting in
the month before enrollment, and only I of the 3 did not report any
injection or sexual risk behavior during that period. Any syringe
sharing was associated with a 3-fold higher risk of Hepatitis C Virus infection (29%
vs 10%; risk ratio [RR] = 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6,
5.3). Similarly, risk of Hepatitis C Virus was 3-fold higher among those who shared a
cooker or cotton (24% vs 7%; RR = 3.39; 95% CI = 1.4, 8.2). Risk of Hepatitis C Virus
seroconversion did not differ according to the frequency of sharing a
cooker and cotton, but it was relatively higher among those who reported
sharing syringes sometimes, usually, or always than among those who
reported rare syringe sharing (X2 test for trend, P<.0I).
Among those who injected with a used syringe, there was no difference in
Hepatitis C Virus incidence between those who almost always used disinfectant bleach
when they shared a syringe and those who never or inconsistently used
bleach. None of the sexual risk behaviors analyzed were associated with
Hepatitis C Virus acquisition; these included number of partners, unprotected anal or
vaginal sex, sex with another injection drug user, and exchanging money
or drugs for sex.
Results of the analysis of Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion stratified by syringe
sharing are shown in Table 2. Among individuals who reported having
injected at least once with a used syringe, sharing both a cooker and
cotton was associated with a risk ratio of 1.7 , sharing rinse water
with a risk ratio of 0.9, and backloading with a risk ratio of 2.1 (all
nonsignificant). Among those who did not inject with a used syringe, the
risk ratio for cooker and cotton sharing was 3.8 (95% CI= 1.1,13.8), but
sharing rinse water and backIoading were not associated with much, if
any, increased risk of seroconverslon.
In
a multiple logistic regression model that included only 123 injection
drug users who injected but did not share syringes during follow-up, the
adjusted risk ratio for cooker and cotton sharing was 5.9 (95% CI=
1.1,31.7). For injection drug users who shared rinse water or backloaded,
risk of Hepatitis C Virus seroconversion was not significantly different than for
those who did not share any equipment (for sharing rinse water, adjusted
risk ratio (APR) = 0.6, (95% CI = 0.1, 2.7); for backloading, APR = 1.1,
(95% CI = 0.2, 4.7)
The
attributable risk percentage for syringe sharing was 66% (Table 3).
Since 77% of Hepatitis C Virus seroconverters had shared syringes, the proportion of
all Hepatitis C Virus infections in the underlying population of injection drug users
that was attributable to syringe sharing (the population attributable
risk percentage) was 51 %. Among those who did not share syringes but
shared cookers and cotton, 74% of infections were due to cooker and
cotton sharing. Because relatively few seroconverters shared cookers and
cotton but not syringes (17%), the population attributable risk
percentage for cooker and cotton sharing for all injection drug users
was only 13%. However, in the underlying population of injection drug
users who did not share syringes, the population attributable risk
percentage for sharing cookers and cotton was substantially higher, 54%.
Discussion
The potential for blood-borne viral transmission via injection equipment
other than syringes was reported in an earlier study of equipment
collected in a Miami shooting gallery, where HIV-l DNA was detected in
rinses from cottons and cookers and in water used to clean paraphernalia
and to dissolve drugs. 17 A sterile syringe may become contaminated when
the tip of the needle is inserted into a contaminated cooker or when the
drug is drawn up through contaminated filtration cotton. This type of
injection risk behavior appears to be quite common, and fewer injection
drug users may recognize the hazard of sharing drug preparation
equipment than recognize the hazard of sharing syringes.lg The present
study suggests that Hepatitis C Virus may be transmitted via the shared use of drug
cookers and filtration cotton even without injection with a contaminated
syringe.
To our knowledge, there have been no prior published reports of incident
blood-brone infections in injection drug users who shared equipment
without sharing syringes. An association between backloading and
prevalent infection with HIV was reported in a New York cross-sectional
study; however, the magnitude of the association was small (adjusted
odds ratio= 1.65), and therefore a notable correlation between syringe
sharing and HIV prevalence may have contributed to the observed re-
lationship.19 Another cross-sectional study reported an association
between frequency of backloading and HIV and Hepatitis C Virus seroprevalence but the
odds ratios were not adjusted for
|
Table 1—Hepatitis C Virus (Hepatitis C Virus)
Seroconverions in Seattle Injection Drug Users in Relation to
Enrollment Characteristics and Risk Behavior During a 1-year
Follow-Up Period |
|
Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Subjects at Baseline No. of Hepatitis C Virus
Seroconversion
n %
Seroconverters Risk, a % |
|
Total |
317 |
100.0% |
53 |
16.7 |
|
Sex
Male
Female |
191
126 |
60.3
39.7 |
29
24 |
15.2
19.0 |
|
Race/ethnicity
African
American
White/Other |
56
261 |
17.7
82.3 |
3
50 |
5.4
19.2 |
|
Age, y
< 24
25-34
35-44
> 45 |
79
144
73
21 |
24.9
45.4
23.0
6.6 |
18
24
8
2 |
22.8
16.7
11.0
14.3 |
|
Lives on the
street or in a shelter
Yes
No |
61
251 |
19.6
80.4 |
11
42 |
18.0
16.7 |
|
Years since
first injection
<2
2-5
>5 |
77
80
101 |
29.8
31.0
39.1 |
21
10
19 |
27.3
12.5
18.8 |
|
Injected every
day during 1 month before enrollment
Yes
No |
156
161 |
49.2
50.8 |
34
19 |
21.8
11.8 |
|
Usual drug
injected
Heroin
alone or with cocaine
Cocaine
alone
Other drugs |
206
97
6 |
66.7
31.4
1.9 |
36
14
1 |
17.5
14.4
16.7 |
|
At follow-up
interview, last injection was
In last 1
month
Since study enrollment, but not
in last month
Before enrollment |
158
101
58 |
49.8
31.9
18.3 |
34
15
3 |
21.5
15.8
5.2 |
|
|
|
Among Those Who Reported Any
Injections During Follow-Up Period (n = 259) |
|
Injected with a
syringe previously used by another
injector
Usually or
always
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
|
14
27
85
130 |
5.5
10.5
33.2
50.8 |
5
13
19
13 |
35.7
48.1
22.4
10.0 |
|
Used bleach to
disinfect syringe previously used
by another
injector
Yes, always
or usually
No, never
or inconsistently |
52
74 |
41.3
58.7 |
14
23 |
26.9
31.1 |
|
Shared a drug
cooker
Yes
No |
174
76 |
69.6
30.4 |
42
6 |
24.1
7.9 |
|
Shared
filtration cotton
Yes
No |
151
99 |
60.4
39.6 |
40
8 |
26.5
8.1 |
|
Shared cooker or
cotton
Usually or
always
Sometimes
Rarely
Never |
73
43
64
71 |
29.1
17.1
25.5
28.3 |
18
11
14
5 |
24.7
25.6
21.9
7.0 |
|
Shared rinse
water
Yes
No |
120
130 |
48.0
52.0 |
27
21 |
22.5
16.2 |
|
Backloaded
Yes
No |
116
135 |
46.2
53.8 |
34
14 |
29.3
10.4 |
|
Note: numbers may not sum to total because of
missing data |
|
a Calculated as number of Hepatitis C Virus
seroconverters per 100 Hepatitis C Virus-negative subjects |
syringe sharing 2O In a Baltimore study of injection drug users aged 18
to 29 years, Hepatitis C Virus antibody seropositivity at study enrollment was
associated with recent backloading and sharing of cookers, cotton, or
rinse water, but not after adjustment for use of new syringes.9
Potential sources of bias in the study were examined. Study retention
was not associated with the injection risk behavior we examined, so
|
TABLE 2-Risk of Hepatitis C Virus
(Hepatitis C Virus) Seroconversion in Seattle Injection
Drug Users Associated With Sharing
Equipment During 1-Year Follow-Up,
Stratified According to Syringe
Sharing |
|
No. Hepatitis C Virus No. Hepatitis C Virus
Negative at Converted at
% RR
Baseline Follow-Up Converted
(95% CI) |
|
Injected With a Syringe Already
Used by Another Injection Drug User
(n = 126) (n = 37) |
|
Shared both cooker and cotton
Yes
No |
95
31 |
31
6 |
32.6
19.4 |
1.7
(0.8, 3.7) |
|
Shared rinse water
Yes
No |
78
48 |
22
15 |
28.2
31.3 |
0.9
(0.5, 1.6) |
|
Backloaded
Yes
No |
90
36 |
31
6 |
34.4
16.7 |
2.1
(0.9, 4.9) |
|
Did Not Inject With a Syringe
Already Used by Another Injection Drug User |
|
(n =
123) (n = 11) |
|
Shared both cooker and cotton
Yes
No |
50
72 |
8
3 |
16.0
4.2 |
3.8
(0.5, 5.1) |
|
Shared rinse water
Yes
No |
41
81 |
5
6 |
12.2
7.4 |
1.7
((0.5, 5.1) |
|
Backloaded
Yes
No |
26
97 |
3
8 |
11.5
8.2 |
1.4
(0.4, 4.9) |
Note. Includes only those who injected during the follow-up period. RR
= risk ratio
CI = confidence interval
|
TABLE 3-Calculation of the
Attributable Risk Percentage (AR%) and the Population Attributable
Risk Percentage (PAR%) for Syringe Sharing and Cooker/Cotton Sharing
and Hepatitis C Virus (Hepatitis C Virus) Seroconversion in Seattle
Injection Drug Users |
|
Cooker/Cotton
Sharing
Without
Syringe Sharing
Syringe Sha | |