|

Embargoed
until:
CONTACT: Debra
Hauser 202/419-3420
Thursday, January
5, 2006
Leading
Medical Association Rejects Abstinence-Only Policies – Programs at odds
with medical ethics and basic human rights
Advocates for Youth Calls for Moratorium
on Federal Funding
Washington, DC
– The Society of Adolescent
Medicine, in one of the most exhaustive reviews to date of
government-funded abstinence-only programs, has rejected current
administration policy that promotes abstinence as the only sexual health
prevention strategy for young people in the United States and abroad.
James Wagoner,
President of Advocates for Youth, said: “The report reads like an
indictment. Abstinence-only is bad science, bad policy, and a blatant
violation of medical ethics and basic human rights. Enough is enough.
The time has come for Congress to declare an immediate moratorium on
federal funding for these programs. It is a national scandal that we
have already spent over $1.1 billion of taxpayers’ dollars on programs
that don’t work and that censor vital public health information for
young people.
“It is time to
restore sanity and common sense to our public health policy. The
Society report is not anti-abstinence. It clearly supports
abstinence as a strategy to protect young people’s sexual health. But
the report makes clear that, to be effective, abstinence education needs
to be delivered in a comprehensive context along with information on
condoms and birth control.
“We have eight
million young people under the age of 19 who are sexually active, yet
79% of junior high and 45% of high school teachers fail to teach about
condoms. No wonder we have the highest rates of teen pregnancy and
sexually transmitted disease in the developed world!”
Among the
highlights of the report:
Abstinence-only Programs Undermine Medical Ethics and Basic Human Rights
“We believe that
current federal abstinence-only-until-marriage policy is ethically
problematic, as it excludes accurate information about contraception,
misinforms by overemphasizing or misstating the risks of contraception,
and fails to require the use of scientifically accurate information
while promoting approaches of questionable value.”
…
“Abstinence-only
programs threaten fundamental human rights to health, information, and
life.”
Abstinence Only “Works Every Time” – Think Again
“Based on our
review of the evaluations of specific abstinence-only curricula and
research on virginity pledges, user failure with abstinence appears to
be very high. Thus, although theoretically completely effective in
preventing pregnancy, in actual practice the efficacy of abstinence-only
interventions may approach zero.”
Abstinence vs. Abstinence Only
“There is broad
support for abstinence as a necessary and appropriate part of sexuality
education. Controversy arises when abstinence is provided to
adolescents as a sole choice and where health information on other
choices is restricted or misrepresented.”
Abstinence-only Programs Negatively Impact Other Federal Policies
Citing the
Administration’s requirement that U.S. AIDS relief programs abroad spend
at least 33 percent of prevention dollars on abstinence-only programs,
the report states: “Human rights groups find that U.S. government
policy has become a source for misinformation and censorship in these
countries. U.S. emphasis on abstinence may also have reduced condom
availability and access to accurate information on HIV/AIDS in some
countries.”
Note: Report
available at
http://www.jahonline.org/article/PIIS1054139X05004672/abstract
Advocates
for Youth is a national,
nonprofit organization that creates programs and advocates for policies
that help young people make safe, responsible decisions about their
sexual and reproductive health.
For more
information or to set up an interview with adolescent sexuality experts,
please contact Debra Hauser at 202/419-3420.
|