Education + Advocacy = Change

 

Click a topic below for an index of articles:

New-Material

Home

Alternative-Treatments

Financial or Socio-Economic Issues

Forum

Health Insurance

Hepatitis

HIV/AIDS

Institutional Issues

International Reports

Legal Concerns

Math Models or Methods to Predict Trends

Medical Issues

Our Sponsors

Occupational Concerns

Our Board

Religion and infectious diseases

State Governments

Stigma or Discrimination Issues

 

IIf you would like to submit an article to this website, email us at info@heart-intl.net for a review of this paper
info@heart-intl.net

any words all words
Results per page:

“The only thing necessary for these diseases to the triumph is for good people and governments to do nothing.”


     

Recommendations for Prevention and Control of
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection and HCV-Related Chronic Disease
Center for Disease Control

MMWR Oct 16, Vol. 47; 1998

http://www.indegene.com/Library/HepatitisRenal/IndHepRenRecommendation.htm

 

Summary

HCV is comonest chronic blood borne infection. Most persons are asymptomatic and not aware of infection

These recommendations are an expansion of previous recommendations for the prevention of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection that focused on screening and follow-up of blood, plasma, organ, tissue, and semen donors (CDC, Public Health Service inter-agency guidelines for screening donors of blood, plasma, organs, tissues, and semen for evidence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C. MMWR 1991; 40 (No.RR-41); 1-17). The recommendations in this report provide broader guidelines for a) preventing transmission of HCV; b) identifying, counseling, and testing persons at risk for HCV infection; and c) providing , appropriate medical evaluation and management of HCV-infected persons. Based on currently available knowledge, these recommendations were developed by CDC staff members after consultation with experts who met in Atlanta during July 15-17, 1998. This report is intended to serve as a resource for health-care professionals, public health officials, and organizations involved in the development, delivery, and evaluation of prevention and clinical services.

Introduction

Chronic liver disease is 10th commonest cause of death in adults. HCV is 40% of these

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common chronic blood-borne infection in the United States. CDC staff estimate that during the 1980s, an average of 2,30,000 new infections occurred each year (CDC, unpublished data). although since 1989 the annual number of new infections has declined by >80% to 36,000 by 1996 (1,2), data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), conducted during 1988-1994, have indicated that an estimated 3.9 million (1.8%). Americans have been infected with HCV (3).

HCV is most common cause of liver disease requiring liver transplant

Most of these persons are chronically infected and might not be aware of their infection because they are at risk for chronic liver disease or other HCV-related chronic diseases during the first two or more decades following initial infection.

Injecting drug users accounts for 60% of HCV transmission.

Chronic liver disease is the tenth cause of death among adults in the United States, and accounts for approximately 25,000 deaths annually, or approximately 1% of all deaths (4). Population-based studies indicate that 40% of chronic liver disease is HCV-related, resulting in an estimated 8,000-10,000 deaths each year (CDC, unpublished data). Current estimates of medical and work-loss costs of HCV-related acute and chronic liver disease are >$600 million annually (CDC, unpublished data), and HCV-associated end-stage liver disease is the most frequent indication for liver transplantation among adults. Because most HCV-infected persons are aged 30-49 years (3), the number of deaths attributable to HCV-related chronic liver disease could increase substantially during the next 10-20 years as this group of infected of infected persons reaches ages at which complications from chronic liver disease typically occur.

HCV is transmitted primarily through large or repeated direct percutaneous exposures to blood. In the United States, the relative importance of the two most common exposures associated with transmission of HCV, blood transfusion and injecting-drug use, has changed over time (Figure 1) (2,5). Blood transfusion, which accounted for a substantial proportion of HCV infections acquired>10 years ago, rarely accounts for recently acquired infections. Since 1994, risk for transfusion, transmitted HCV infection has been so low that CDC/Es sentinel counties viral hepatitis surveillance system* has been unable to detect any transfusion-associated cases of acute hepatitis C, although the risk is not zero. In contrast, injecting-drug use consistently has accounted for a substantial proportion of HCV infections and currently accounts for 60% of HCV transmission in the United States. A high proportion of infections continues to be associated with injecting-drug use, but for reasons that are unclear, the dramatic decline in incidence of acute hepatitis C since 1989 correlates with a decrease in cases among injecting-drug users.

Reducing the burden of HCV infection and HCV-related disease in the United States requires implementation of primary prevention activities to reduce the risk for contracting HCV infection and secondary prevention activities to reduce the risk for liver and chronic diseases in HCV-infected persons. The recommendations contained in this report were developed by reviewing currently available data and are based on experts. These recommendations provide broad guidelines for a) the prevention of transmission of HCV : b) the identification, counseling, and testing of persons at risk for HCV infection; and c) the appropriate medical evaluation and management of HCV-infected persons.

*Sentinel counties viral hepatitis surveillance system

Identifies all persons with symptomatic acute viral hepatitis reported through stimulated passive surveillance to the participating country health departments (four during 1982-1995 and six during 1996-1998). These countries are demographically representative of the U.S. population. Serum samples from reported cases are tested for all viral hepatitis markers, and case-patients are interviewed extensively for risk factors for infection.

Background

Prospective studies of transfusion recipients in the United States demonstrated that rates of post-transfusion hepatitis in the 1960s exceeded 20% (6). In the mid 1970s, available diagnostic tests indicated that 90% of post-transfusion hepatitis was not caused by hepatitis A or hepatitis B viruses and that the more to all-volunteer blood donors had reduced risks for post-transfusion hepatitis to 10%(7-9). Although non-A, non-B hepatitis (i.e., neither type A nor type B) was first recognized because of its association with blood transfusion, population-based sentinel surveillance demonstrated that this disease accounted for 15%-20% of community-acquired viral hepatitis in the United States (5). Discovery of HCV by molecular cloning in 1988 indicated that non-A, non-B hepatitis was primarily caused by HCV infection (5,10-14).

Epidemiology

Demographic Characteristics

HCV infection occurs among persons of all ages, but the highest incidence of acute hepatitis C is found among persons aged 2-39 years, and males predominate slightly (5). African Americans and whites have similar incidence of acute disease; persons of Hispanic ethnicity have higher rates. In the general population, the highest prevalence rates of HCV infection are found among persons ages 30-49 years and among male/Es (3). Unlike the racial/ethnic pattern of acute disease, African Americans have a substantially higher prevalence of HCV infection than do whites.

Prevalence of HCV Infection is Selected Populations in the United States.

Highest
* IV Drug users
* Haemophiliacs Moderate
* Dialysis pts Low
* High risk sex behavior
* Health care persons.

The greatest variation in prevalence of HCV infection occurs among persons with different risk factors for infection (15) (Table 1). Highest prevalence of infection is found among those with large or repeated direct percutaneous exposures to blood (e.g., injecting-drug users, persons with hemophilia who were treated with clotting factor concentrates produced before 1987, and recipients of transfusions from HCV-positive donors) (12,13,16-22). Moderate prevalence is found among those with frequent but smaller direct percutaneous exposures (e.g.,, long -term hemodialysis patients) (23). Lower prevalence is found among those with inapparent percutaneous or mucosal exposures (e.g., persons with evidence of high-risk sexual particles) (24-28) or among those with small, sporadic percutaneous exposures (e.g., health-care workers) (29-33). Lowest prevalence of HCV Infection is found among those with no high-risk characteristics (e.g., volunteer blood donors) (34; persona; communication, RY Dodd, PhD., Head, Transmissible Diseases, Department, Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross, Rockville, MD, July 1998). The estimated prevalence of persons with different risk factors and characteristics also varies widely in the U.S. population (Table 1) (3; 35-29: CDC, unpublished data).

page23.gif (22033 bytes)

Transmission Modes

Most risk factors associated with transmission of HCV in the United States were identified in case-control studies conducted during 1978-1986 (40,41). These risk factors included blood transfusion, injecting-drug use, employment in patient care or clinical laboratory work, exposure to a sex partner or household member who socioeconomic level. These studies reported no association with military service or exposures resulting from medical, surgical, or dental procedures, tattoing, acupuncture, ear piercing, or foreign travel. If transmission from such exposures does occur, the frequency might be too low to detect.

Transfusions and Transplants.

Transfusion associated risk is 0.001%

Currently, HCV is rarely transmitted by blood transfusion. During 1985-1990. cases of transfusion-associated non-A, non-B hepatitis declined by >50% because of screening policies that excluded donors with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and donors with surrogate markers for non-A, non-B hepatitis (5.42) by 1990, risk for transfusion-associated HCV infection was approximately 1.5%/recipient or approximately 0.02%/unit transfused (42). During may 1990, routine testing of donors for evidence of HCV infection was initiated, and during July 1992, more sensitive mullet-antigen testing was implemented, reducing further the risk for infection to 0.001%/ unit transfused ( 43 ).

Receipt of clotting factor concentrates prepared from plasma pools posed a high risk for HCV infection (44) until effective procedures to inactivate viruses, including HCV, were introduced during 1985 (Factor VIII) and 1987 (Factor IX). Persons with hemophilia who were treated with products before inactivation of those products have prevalence rates of HCV infection as high as 90% (20-22). Although plasma derivatives (e.g., albumin and immune globulin [IG] for intramuscular [IM] administration) have not been associated with transmission of HCV infection in United States, intravenous (IV) IG that was not virally inactivated was the source of one out-break of hepatitis C during 1993-1994 (45.46). Since December 1994, all IG products IV and IM commercially available in the United States must undergo an inactivation procedure or be negative for HCV RNA (ribonucleic acid) before release.

Transplantation of organs (e.g., heart, kidney, or liver) from infectious donors to the organ recipient also carried a high risk for transmitting HCV infection before donor screening (47,48). Limited studies of recipients of transplanted tissue have implicated transmission of HCV only from non-irradiated bone tissue of unscreened donors (49,50). As with blood-donor screening,use of anti-HCV-negative organ and tissue donors has virtually eliminated risks for HCV transmission from transplantation.

Injecting and other Illegal Drug use.

90% of IV drug users will be HCV+ve at the end of 5 years

Although the number of cases of acute hepatitis C among injecting-drug users has declined dramatically since 1989, both incidence and prevalence of HCV infection remain high in this group (51,52). Injecting -drug use currently accounts for most HCV transmission in the United States, and has accounted for a substantial proportion of HCV infections during past decades (2,5,53). Many persons with chronic HCV infection might have acquired their infection 20-30 years ago as a result of limited or occasional illegal drug injecting. Injecting -drug use leads to HCV transmission in a manner similar to that for other blood-borne pathogens (i.e., through transfer of HCV-infected blood sharing syringes and needles either directly or through contamination of drug preparation equipment) (54,55). However, HCV infection is acquired more rapidly after initiation of injecting than other viral infections (i.e., hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV), and rates of HCV infection among young injecting drug users are four times higher than rates of HIV infection (19). After 5 years of injecting, as many as 90% of users are infected with HCV. More rapid acquisition of HCV infection compared with other viral infections among injecting-drug users is likely caused by high prevalence of chronic HCV infection among injecting-drug users, which results in a greater likelihood of exposure to an HCV- infected person.

A study conducted among volunteer blood donors in the United States documented that HCV infection has been independently associated with a history of intranasal cocaine use (56). (The more of transmission could be through sharing contaminated straws). Data from NHANES III indicated that 14% of the general population have used cocaine at least once (CDC, unpublished data). Although NHANES III data also indicated that cocaine use was associated with HCV infection, injecting-drug use histories were not ascertained. Among patients with acute hepatitis C identified in CDC/Es sentinel countries viral hepatitis surveillance system since 1991. Intranasal cocaine use in the absence of injecting-drug use was uncommon (2). Thus, at least in the recent past, intranasal cocaine use rarely appears to have contributed to transmission. Until more data are available, whether persons with a history of non-injecting illegal drug use alone (e.g., Intranasal cocaine use) are likely to be infected with HCV remains unknown.

Nosocomial and Occupational Exposures.

Transmission high among hemodialysis and medication vial sharing is an important mode. Over all prevalence 10%

Nosocomial transmission of HCV is possible if infection-control techniques or disinfection procedures are inadequate and contaminated equipment is shared among patients. Although reports from other countries do document nosocomial HCV transmission (57-59), such transmission rarely has been reported in the United States (60), other than in chronic hemodialysis settings (61). Prevalence of antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) positivity among chronic hemodialysis patients averages 10% , with some centers reporting rates >60% (23). Both incidence and prevalence studies have documented an association between anti-HCV positivity and increasing years on dialysis, independent of blood transfusion (62,63). These studies, as well as investigations of dialysis-associated outbreaks of hepatitis C (64), indicate that HCV transmission might occur among patients in a hemodialysis center because of incorrect implementation of infection-control practices, practices, particularly sharing of medication vials and supplies (65).

Health-care, emergency medical (e.g., emergency medical technicians and paramedics) and public safety workers (e.g., fire-service, law-enforcement, and correctional facility personnel) who have exposure to blood in the workplace are at risk for being infected with blood-borne pathogens. However, prevalence of HCV infection among health-care workers, including orthopedic, general, and oral surgeons, is no greater than the general population, averaging 1%-2% and is 10 times lower than that for HBV infection (29-33). In a single study that evaluated risk factors for infection, a history of unintentional needle-stick injury was the only occupational risk factor independently associated with HCV infection (66).

The average incidence of anti-HCV seroconvertion after unintentional needle sticks or sharps exposures from an HCV-positive source is 1.8% (range: 0%-7%) (67-70), with one study reporting that transmission occurred only from hollowbore needles compared with other sharps (69). A study from Japan reported an incidence of HCV infection of 10% based on detection of HCV RNA by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (70). Although no incidence studies have documented transmission associated with mucous membrane or non-intact skin exposures, transmission of HCV from blood splashes to the conjunctiva have been described (71,72).

The risk for HCV transmission from an infected health-care worker to patients appears to be very low. One published report exists of such transmission during performance of exposure-prone invasive procedures (73). That report, from Spain, described HCV transmission from a cardio-thoracic surgeon to five patients, but did not identify factors that might have contributed to transmission. Although factors (e.g., virus titer might be related to transmission of HCV, no methods exist currently that can reliably determine infectivity, nor do data exist to determine threshold concentration of virus required for transmission.

Percutaneous Exposures in Other Settings.

Important but not discussed commonly
*Folk medicines practices
* Tattooing
* Body piercing
* Barbering
* Sharing took brush and nail cutter

In other countries, HCV infection has been associated with folk medicine practices, tattooing, body piercing, and commercial barbering (74-81). However, in the United States, case-control studies have reported no association between HCV infection and these types of exposures (40,41). In addition, of patients with acute hepatitis C who were identified in CDC/Es sentinel counties viral hepatitis surveillance system during the past 15 years and who denied a history of injecting-drug use, only 1% reported a history of tattooing or ear piercing, and none reported a history of acupuncture (41; CDC, Unpublished Data). Among injecting-drug users. frequency of tattooing and ear piercing also was uncommon (3%). Although any percutaneous exposure has the potential for transferring infectious blood and potentially transmitting blood-borne pathogens (i.e., HBV,HCV, or HIV), no data exist in the United States indicating that persons with exposures to tattooing and body piercing alone are at increased risk for HCV infection. Further studies are needed to determine if these types of exposures and settings in which they occur (e.g., correctional institutions, unregulated commercial establishments), are risk factors for HCV infection in the United States.

Sexual Activity.

15-20% HCV +ve has high risk sexual activity

Sexual transmission is more common male to female than otherwise

Case-control studies have reported an association between exposure to a sex contact with a history of hepatitis or exposure to multiple sex partners and acquiring hepatitis C(40,41). In addition, 15%-20% of patients with acute hepatitis C who have been reported to CDC/Es sentinel counties surveillance system, have a history of sexual exposure in the absence of other risk factors, Two thirds of these have an anti-HCV-positive sex partner, and one third reported >e partners in the 6 months before illness (2).

In contrast, a low prevalence of HCV infection has been reported by studies of long-term spouses of patients with chronic HCV infection who had no other risk factors for infection. Five of these studies have been conducted in the United States, involving 30-85 partners each, in which average prevalence of HCV infection was 1.5% (range: 0% to 4.4%) (56,82-85). Among partners of persons with hemophilia co-infected with HCV and HIV, two studies have reported an average prevalence of HCV infection of 3% (83,86). One additional study evaluated potential transmissionof HCV between sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic patients, who denied percutaneous risk factors, and their steady partners (28). Prevalence of HCV infection among male patients an anti-HCV-positive female partner (7%0 was no different than that among males with a negative female partner (8%). However, female patients with an anti-HCV-positive partner were almost fourfold more likely to have HCV infection than females with a negative male partner (10% versus 3%, respectively). These data indicate that, similar to other blood-borne viruses, sexual transmission of HCV from males to females might be more efficient than from females to males.

Among persons with evidence of high-risk sexual practices (e.g., patients attending STD clinics and female prostitutes) who denied a history of injecting-drug use, prevalence of anti-HCV has been found to average 6% (range: 1%-10%) (24,28,87). Specific factors associated with anti-HCV positivity for both heterosexuals and men who have sex with men (MSM) included greater numbers of sex partners, a history prior STDs, and failure to use a condom. However, the number of partners associated with infection risk varied among studies, ranging from >1 partner in the previous months to >50 in the previous year. In studies of other populations, the number of partners associated with HCV infection also varied, ranging from >2 partners in the 6 months before illness for persons with acute hepatitis C (41), to >5 partners/year for HCV-infected volunteer blood donors (56), to > q0 lifetime partners foe HCV-infected persons in the general population (3).

Only one study has documented an association between HCV infection and MSM activity (28), and at least in STD clinic settings, the prevalence rate of HCV infection among MSM generally has been similar to that of heterosexuals. Because sexual transmission of blood-borne/ viruses is recognized to be more efficient among MSM compared with heterosexual men and women. why HCV infection rates are not substantially higher among MSM compared with heterosexuals is unclear. This observation and the low prevalence of HCV infection observed among long-term spouses of persons with chronic HCV infection have raised doubts regarding the importance of sexual activity in transmission of HCV. Unacknowledged percutaneous risk factors (i.e., illegal injecting-drug use) might contribute to increased risk foe HCV infection among persons with high risk sexual practices.

Although considerable inconsistencies exist among studies, data indicate overall that sexual transmission of HCV appears to occur, but that the virus is inefficiently spread through this manner. More data are needed to determine the risk for, and factors related to, transmission of HCV between long-term steady partners as will as among persons with high-risk sexual practices, including whether other STDs as among persons with high-risk sexual practices, including whether other STDs promote transmission of HCV by influencing viral load or modifying mucosal barriers.

Household contact.

Risk to nonsexual household contact is very little

Case-control studies also have reported an association between non-sexual household contact and acquiring hepatitis C (40,41). The presumed mechanism of transmission is direct or inapparent percutaneous or permucosal exposure to infectious blood or body fluids containing blood, In a recent investigation in the United States, an HCV-infected mother transmitted HCV to her hemophilic child during performance of home infusion therapy, presumably when she had an unintentional needle stick and subsequently used the contaminated needle in the child (88).

Although prevalence of HCV infection among non-sexual household contacts of persons with chronic HCV infection in the United States in unknown, HCV transmission to such contacts is probably uncommon. In studies from other countries of non-sexual; household contacts of patients with chronic hepatitis C, average anti-HCV prevalence was 4% (15). Although infected contacts in these studies reported no other commonly recognized risk for hepatitis C, most of these studies were done in countries where exposures commonly experienced in the past from contaminated equipment used in traditional and nontraditional medical procedures might have contributed to clustering of HCV infections in families (75,76,79).

Perinatal.

5-6% of infants born to HCV +ve mother have HCV infection

The average rate of HCV infection among infants born HCV-positive, HIV-negative women is 5%-6%(range: 0%-25%) based on detection of anti-HCV and co-infected with HCV RNA, respectively(89-101). The average infection rate for infants born to women detection of anti-HCV and HIV is higher u 14% (range: 5%-36%) and 17%, based on detection of anti-HCV and HCV RNA, respectively (90,96,98-104). The only factor consistently found to be associated with transmission has been the presence of HCV RNA in the mother at the time of birth. Although two studies of infants born to HCV-positive, HIV-negative women reported an association with titer of HCV RNA each study reported different level of HCV RNA related to transmission (92,93). Studies of HCV/HIV co-infected women more consistently have indicated an association between virus titer and transmission of HCV (102). Data regarding the relationship between delivery mode and HCV transmission are limited and presently indicate no difference in infection rates between infants delivered vaginally compared with cesarean-delivered infants. The transmission of HCV infection through breast milk has not been documented. In the studies that evaluated breast-feeding in infants born to HCV-infected women, average rate of infection was 4% in both breast-fed and bottle-fed infants(95,96,99,100,105,106). Diagnostic criteria for perinatal HCV infection have not been established. Various anti-HCV patterns have been observed in both infected and uninfected infants of anti-HCV-positive mothers. Passively acquired maternal antibody might persist for months, but probably not for>12 months. HCV RNA can be detected as early as 1 to 2 months.

Persons with No Recognized Source for Their Infection.

Recent studies have demonstrated that injecting-drug use currently accounts for 60% of HCV transmission in the United States (2). Although the role of sexual activity in transmission of HCV remains unclear, <20% of persons with HCV infection report sexual exposures (i.e., exposure to an infected sexual partner or to multiple partners) in the absence of percutaneous risk factors (2). Other know exposures (occupational, hemodialysis, household, perinatal) together account for approximately 10% of infections. Thus, a potential risk factor can be identified for approximately 90% of persons with HCV infection. In the remaining 10%, no recognized source of infection can be identified, although most persons in this category are associated with low socioeconomic level. Although low socioeconomic level has been associated with several infectious diseases and might be a surrogate for high-risk exposures, its nonspecific nature makes targeting prevention measures difficult.

Screening and Diagnostic Tests

Serologic Assays

Serological tests do not differentiate between acute/chronic and resolved infection.

The only tests currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for diagnosis of HCV infection are those that measure anti-HCV (Table 2) (107). These tests detect anti-HCV in >97% of infected patients but do not distinguish between acute, chronic, or resolved infection. As with any screening test, positive predictive value of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for anti-HCV varies depending on prevalence of infection in the population and is low in populations with an HCV infection prevalence of >10%(1,34). Supplemental testing with a more specific assay (i.e., recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) of a specimen with a positive EIA result prevents reporting of false-positive results, particularly in settings where asymptomatic persons are being tested.

  page29.gif (29736 bytes)

Supplemental test results might be reported as positive, negative, or indeterminate. An anti-HCV-positive person is defined as one whose serologic results are EIA-test-positive and supplemental-test-positive. Persons with a negative EIA test result or a positive EIA and a negative supplemental test result are considered uninfected, unless other evidence exists to indicate HCV infection (e.g., abnormal ALT level in immunocompromised persons or persons with no other etiology for their liver disease). Indeterminate supplemental test results have been observed in recently infected persons who are the process of seroconvertion, as well as in persons chronically infected with HCV. Indeterminate anti-HCV results also might indicate a false-positive result, particularly in those persons at low risk for HCV infection.

Nucleic Acid Detection

HCV RNA is important for deciding management. It may be positive, intermittently also

The diagnosis of HCV infection also can be made by qualitatively detecting HCV RNA using gene amplification techniques (e.g., RT-PCR) (Table 2) (108). HCV RNA can be detected in serum or plasma within 1-2 weeks after exposure to the virus and weeks before the onset of Aladdin aminotransferase (ALT) elevations or the appearance of anti-HCV. Rarely, detection of HCV RNA might be the only evident of HCV infection. Although RT-PCR assay kits for HCV RNA are available for research purposes approved by FDA. In addition, numerous laboratories perform RT-PCR using in-house laboratory methods and reagents.

Although not FDS-approved, RT-PCR assays for HCV infection are sued commonly in clinical practice. Most RT-PCR assays have a lower limit of detection of 100-1,000 viral genome copies/ml. With adequate optimization of RT-PCR assays, 75%-85% of persons who are anti-HCV positive and >95% of persons with acute or chronic hepatitis C will test positive for HCV RNA. Some HCV-infected persons might be only intermittently HCV RNA-positive, particularly those with acute hepatitis C or with end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C. To minimize false-negative results, serum must be separated from cellular components within 2-4 hours after collection, and preferably stored frozen at -20C or -70C). If shipping is required, frozen samples should be protected from thawing. Because of assay variability, rigorus quality assurance and control should be in place in clinical laboratories performing this assay, and proficiency testing is recommended.

Quantitative assays for measuring the concentration (titer) of HCV RNA have been developed and are available from commercial laboratories (1 10), including a quantitative RT-PCR (Amplicor HCV Monitor, Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg. New Jersey) and a branched DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) signal amplification assay (Quantriplex HCV RNA Assay (bDNA), Chiron Corp., Emeryville, California) (Table 2). These assays also are not FDA-approved, and compared with qualitative RT-PCR assays, are less sensitive with lower limits of detection of 500 viral genome copies/ml for the Amplicor HCV Monitor to 2,00,000 genome equivalents/ml for the Quantiplex HCV RNA Assay (111). In addition, they each use a different standard, which precludes direct comparisons between the two assays. Quantitative assays should not be used as a primary test to confirm or exclude diagnosis of HCV infection or to monitor the endpoint of treatment. Patient with chronic hepatitis C generally circulate virus at levels of 105-107 genome copies/ml. Testing for level of HCV RNA might help predict likelihood of response to antiviral therapy, although sequential measurement of HCV RNA levels has not proven useful in managing patients with hepatitis C.

70% of HCV are due to genotype 1

At least six different genotypes and > 90 subtypes of HCV exist (112).

Approximately 70% of HCV-infected persons in the United States are infected with genotype 1, with frequency of subtype 1a predominating over subtype 1b. Different nucleic acid detection methods are available commercially to group isolates of HCV, based on genotypes and subtypes (113). Evidence is limited regarding differences in clinical features, disease outcome, or progression to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among persons with different genotypes. However, differences do exist in responses to antiviral therapy according to HCV genotype. Rates of response in patients infected with genotype 1 are substantially lower than in patients with other genotypes, and treatment regimens might differ on the basis of genotype. Thus, genotyping might be warranted among persons with chronic hepatitis C who are being considered for antiviral therapy.

Clinical Features and Natural History

Acute HCV Infection

More than 70% infected patients are asymptomatic. 10-20% have non-specific symptoms

Persons with acute HCV infection typically are either asymptomatic or have a mild clinical illness; 60-70% have no discernible symptoms; 20%-30% might have Jaundice: and 10-20% might have nonspecific symptoms (e.g., anorexia, malaise, or abdominal pain) (13,114,115). Clinical illness in patients with acute hepatitis C who seek medical care is similar to that of other types of viral hepatitis, and serologic testing is necessary to determine the etiology of hepatitis in an individual patient. In <20% of these patients, onset of symptoms might precede anti-HCV seroconvertion. Average time period from exposure to symptom onset is 6-7 weeks (116-118). Whereas average time period from exposure to seroconversion is 8-9 weeks (114; personal communication, H) Alter, M.D., Chief, department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of health, Bethesda, MD, September 1998). Anti-HCV can be detected in 80% of patients within 15 weeks after exposure, in >90% within 5 months after exposure and in >97% by 6 months after exposure (14,114). Rarely, seroconvertion might be delayed until 9 months after exposure (14,119).

The course of acute hepatitis C is variable, although elevations in serum ALT levels, often in a fluctuating pattern, are its most characteristic feature. Normalization of ALT levels might occur and suggests full recovery, but this is frequently followed by ALT elevations that indicate progression to chronic disease (14). Fulminant hepatic failure following acute hepatitis C is rare (120,121).

     

Chronic HCV Infection

HCV infection becomes chronic in 75-80% cases and of these 60-70% show disease activity

After acute infection, 15%-25% of persons appear to resolve their infection without sequelae as defined by sustained absence of HCV RNA in serum and normalization of ALT levels (122; personal communication, LB Seeff, M.D., Senior Scientist (Hepatitis C), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, July 1998). Chronic HCV infection develops in most persons (75%-85%) (14,122-124), with persistent or fluctuating ALT elevations indicating active liver disease developing in 60-70% of chronically infected persons (12-15, 116,122-124). In the remaining 30%-40% of

10-20% may develop cirrhosis in 1-2 decade time. This is past figures without any treatment

chronically infected persons, ALT levels are normal. No clinical or epidemiologic features among patients with acute infection have been found to be predictive of either persistent infection or chronic liver disease. Moreover, various ALT patterns have been observed in these patients during follow-up, and patients might have prolonged periods (<12 months) of normal ALT activity even though they have histologically confirmed chronic hepatitis (14). Thus, a single ALT determination cannot be used to exclude ongoing hepatic injury, and long-term follow-up of

Risk factors for Cirrhosis are

* Male
* Age>40 yrs
* Genotype 1
* Alcoholics

Patients with HCV infection is required to determine their clinical outcome or prognosis.

The course of chronic liver disease is usually insidious, progressing at a slow rate without symptoms or physical signs in the majority of patients during the first two or more decades after infection. frequently, chronic hepatitis C is not recognized until asymptomatic persons are identified as HCV-positive during blood-donor screening, or elevated ALT levels are detected during routine physical examinations. Most studies have reported that cirrhosis develops in 10%-20% of persons with chronic hepatitis C over a period of 20-30 years, and HCC in 1%-5%, with striking geographic variations in rates of this disease(124-128). However, when cirrhosis is established, the rate of development of HCC might be as high as 1%-4% year, In contrast, a study of >200 women 17 years after they received HCV-contaminated Rh factor IG reported that only 2.4% had evidence of cirrhosis and none had died (129). Thus, long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess lifetime consequences of chronic hepatitis C, particularly among those who acquired their infection at young ages.

Although factors predicting severity of liver disease have not been well defined, recent data indicate that increased alcohol intake, being aged >40 years at infection, and being male are associated with more severe liver disease and HCV infection, liver disease progresses more rapidly; among those with cirrhosis, a higher risk for development of HCC exists (131). Furthermore, even intake of moderate amounts(>10g/day) of alcohol in patients with chronic hepatitis C might enhance disease progression. More severe liver injury observed in persons with alcoholic liver disease and HCV infection possibly is attributable to alcohol-induced enhancement of viral replication or increased susceptibility of cells to viral injury. In addition, persons who have chronic liver disease are at increased risk for fulminant hepatitis A (132).

Extrahepatic manifestations of chronic HCV infection are considered to be of immunological origin and include cryoglobulinemia, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and porphyria cutanea tarda (131). Other extrahepatic conditions have been reported , but definitive associations of these conditions with HCV infection have not been established. These include seronegative arthritis, Sjogren syndrome, autoimmune thyroditis, lichen planus, Mooren corneal ulcers, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (Human-Rich syndrome), polyarteritis nodosa, aplastic anemia, and B-cell lymphomas.

Clinical Management and Treatment

Treatment is needed if: anti-HCV +ve detectable HCV-RNA, persistent high ALT, liver biopsy show moderate disease and No cirrhosis.

HCV-positive patients should be evaluated for presence and severity of chronic liver disease (133). Initial evaluation for presence of disease should include multiple measurements of ALT at regular intervals, because ALT activity fluctuates in persons with chronic hepatitis C. Patients with chronic hepatitis C should be evaluated for severity of their liver disease and for possible treatment(133-135). Antiviral therapy is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C who are at greatest risk for progression to cirrhosis (133). These persons include anti-HCV-positive patients with persistently elevated ALT levels, detectable HCV RNA, and a liver biopsy that indicates either portal or bridging fibrosis or at least moderate degrees of inflammation and necrosis.

In patients with less severe histologic changes, indications for treatment are less clear, and careful clinical follow-up might be an acceptable alternative to treatment with antiviral therapy (e.g., interferon) because progression to cirrhosis is likely to be slow, if it occurs at all. Similarly, patients with compensated cirrhosis(without jaundice, ascites, variceal hemorrhage, or encephalopathy) might not benefit from interferon therapy. Careful assessment should be made, and the risks and benefits of therapy should be thoroughly discussed with the patient. Patients with persistently normal ALT values should not be treated with interferon outside of clinical trials because treatment might actually induce liver enzyme abnormalities (136). Patients with advanced cirrhosis that might be at risk for decompensation with therapy and pregnant women also should not be treated. Interferon treatment is not FDA-approved for patients aged <18 years, and more data are needed regarding treatment of persons aged <18 years or >60 years. Treatment of patients who are drinking excessive amounts of alcohol or who are injecting illegal drugs should be delayed until these behaviors have been discounted for >6 months. Contraindications to treatment with interferon include major depressive illness, cytopenias, hyperthyrodism, renal transplantation, and evidence of autoimmune disease.

Treatment questionable in

* Persistent normal ALT
* Cirrhosis
* Major depressive illness

Most clinical trials of treatment for chronic hepatitis C have been conducted using alpha-interferon (134,135,137,138). When the recommended regimen of 3 million units administered subcutaneously 3 times/week for 12 months is used, approximately 50% of treated patients have normalization of serum ALT activity (biochemical response), and 33% have a loss of detectable HCV RNA in serum (virologic response) at the end of therapy. However, >50% of these patients relapse when therapy is stopped. Thus, 15%-25% have a sustained response as measured by testing for ALT and HCV RNA>1 years after therapy is stopped, many of whom also have histologic improvement. For patients who do not respond by the end of therapy, re-treatment with a standard dose of interferon is rarely effective. Patients who have persistently abnormal ALT levels and detectable HCV RNA in serum after 3 months of interferon are unlikely to respond to treatment, and interferon should be discontinued. These persons might be considered for participation in clinical trials of alternative treatments. Decreased interferon response rates(<15%) have been found in patients with higher serum HCV RNA titers and HCV genotype 1 (the most common strain of HCV in the United States); however, treatment should not be withheld based solely on these findings.

Therapy of HCV is fast changing field of hepatitis. It should be individualised

Therapy for hepatitis C is a rapidly changing area of clinical practice. Combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin, a nucleoside analogue, is now FDA-approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients who have relapsed following interferon treatment and might be approved soon for patients who have not been treated previously. Studies of patients treated with a combination of ribavirin and interferon have demonstrated a substantial increase in sustained response rates, reaching 40%-50%, compared with response rates of 15%-25% with interferon alone (139,140). However, as with interferon alone, combination therapy in patients with genotype 1 is not as successful, and sustained response rates among these patients are still <30%.

Combination of induction interferon and ribavarin is probably the best at present

Most patients receiving interferon experience flu-like symptoms early in treatment, but these symptoms diminish with continued treatment. Later side effects include fatigue, bone marrow suppression, and neuropsychiatric effects(e.g., apathy, cognitive changes, irritability, and depression). Interferon dosage must be reduced in 10%-40% of patients and discontinued in

5%-15% because of severe side effects. Ribavirin can induce hemolytic anemia and can be problematic for patients with preexisting anemia, bone marrow suppression, or renal failure. In these patients, combination therapy should be avoided or attempts should be made to correct the anemia. Hemolytic anemia caused by ribavirin also can be life threatening for patients with ischemic heart disease or cerebral vascular disease. Ribavirin is teratogenic, and female patients should avoid becoming pregnant during therapy.

Other treatments, including corticosteroids, ursodiol, and thymosin, have not been effective. High iron levels in the liver might reduce the efficacy of interferon. Use of iron-reduction therapy(phlebotomy or chelation) in combination with interferon has been studied, but results have been inconclusive. Because patients are becoming more interested in alternative therapies(e.g., traditional Chinese medicine, anti-oxidants, naturopathy, and homeopathy), physicians should be prepared to address questions rtegarding these topics.

Postexposure Prophylaxis and Follow-up

Available data regarding the prevention of HCV infection with IG indicate that IG is not effective for postexposure prophylaxis of hepatitis C (67,141). No assessments have been made of postexposure use of antiviral agents (e.g., interferon) to prevent HCV infection. Mechanisms of the effect of interferon in treating patients with hepatitis C are poorly understood, and an established infection might need to be present for interferon to be an effective treatment (142). As of the publication of this report, interferon is FDA-approved only for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

The immediate postexposure setting provides opportunity to identify persons early in the course of their HCV infection. Studies indicate that interferon treatment begun early in the course of HCV infection is associated with a higher rate of resolved infection (143). However, no data exist indicating that the treatment begun during the acute phase of infection is more effective than treatment begun early during the course of chronic HCV infection. In addition, as stated previously, interferon is not FDA-approved for this indication. Determination of whether treatment of HCV infection is more beneficial in the acute phase than in the early chronic phase will require evaluation with well-designed research protocols.

Prevention and Control Recommendations

Rationale

Reducing the burden of HCV infection and HCV-related disease in the United States requires implementation of primary prevention activities that reduce risks for contracting HCV infection and secondary prevention activities that reduce risks for liver and other chronic diseases in HCV-infected persons. In addition, surveillance and evaluation activities are required to determine the effectiveness of prevention programs in reducing incidence of disease, identifying persons infected with HCV, providing appropriate medical follow-up, and promoting healthy lifestyles and behaviors. Primary prevention activities can reduce or eliminate potential risk for HCV transmission from a) blood, blood components, and plasma derivatives; b)such high-risk activities as injecting-drug use and sex with multiple partners; and c)percutaneous exposures to blood in health care and other(i.e., tattooing and body piercing) settings.

Immunization against HCV is not available; therefore, identifying persons at risk but not infected with HCV provides opportunity for counseling on how to reduce their risk for becoming infected.

Elements of a comprehensive strategy to prevent and control hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related disease.

·         * Primary prevention activities include.
- Screening and testing of blood, plasma, organ, tissue, and semen donors
- Virus inactivation of plasma-derived products;
- risk-reduction counseling and services; and
- implementation and maintenance of infection-control practices

·         Secondary prevention activities include
- identification, counseling, and testing of persons at risk, and
- medical management of infected persons

·         Professional and public education

·         Surveillance and research to monitor disease trends and the effectiveness of prevention activities and to develop improved prevention methods.

Secondary prevention activities can reduce risks for chronic disease by identifying HCV-infected persons through diagnostic testing and by providing appropriate medical management and antiviral therapy. Because of the number of persons with chronic HCV infection, identification of these persons must be a major focus of current prevention programs. Identification of persons at risk for HCV infection provides opportunity for testing to determine their infection status, medical evaluation to determine their disease status if infected, and antiviral therapy, if appropriate. Identification also provides infected persons opportunity to obtain information concerning how they can prevent further harm to their liver and prevent transmitting HCV to others.

Factors for consideration when making decisions regarding development and implementation of preventive services for a particular disease include the public health importance of the disease, the availability of appropriate diagnostic tests, and the effectiveness of available preventive and therapeutic interventions. However, identification of persons at risk for HCV infection must take into account not only the benefits but also the limitations and drawbacks associated with such efforts. Hepatitis C is a disease of major public health importance, and suitable and accurate diagnostic tests as well as behavioral and therapeutic interventions are available. Counseling and testing can prevent disease transmission and progression through reducing high-risk practices(e.g., injecting-drug use and alcohol intake). However, the degree to which persons will change their high-risk practices based on knowing their test results is not known, and possible adverse consequences of testing exist, their test results is not known, and possible adverse consequences of testing exist, including disclosure of test results to others that might result in disrupted personal relationships and possible discriminatory action (e.g., loss of employment, insurance, relationships and educational opportunities). Antiviral treatment is also available, and treatment guidelines have been developed. Such treatment is beneficial for many patients; although sustained response rates and mode of delivery are currently less than ideal.

Persons at risk for HCV infection who receive health-care services in the public and private sectors should have access to counseling and testing. Facilities that provide counseling and testing should include services or referrals for medical evaluation and management of persons identified as infected with HCV. Priorities for implementing new counseling and testing programs should be based on providing access to persons who are most likely to be infected or who practice high-risk behaviors.

Primary Prevention Recommendations

Blood, Plasma Derivatives, Organs, Tissues, and Semen

Current practices that exclude blood, plasma, organ, tissue, or semen donors determined to be at increased risk for HCV by history or who have serologic markers for HCV infection must be maintained to prevent HCV transmission from transfusions and transplants (1) Viral inactivation of clotting factor concentrates and other products derived from human plasma, including IG products, also must be continued, and all plasma-derived products that do not undergo viral inactivation should be HCV RNA negative by RT-PCR before release.

High-Risk Drug and Sexual Practices

Adolescent should be counseled against:

* High risk sex
* IV drug use

Health-care professionals in all patient care settings routinely should obtain a history that inquires about use of illegal drugs (injecting and noninjecting) and evidence of high-risk sexual practices(e.g., multiple sex partners or a history of STDs). Primary prevention of illegal drug injecting will eliminate the greatest risk factor for HCV infection in the United States(144). Although consistent data are lacking regarding the extent to which sexual activity contributes to HCV transmission. Persons having multiple sex partners are at risk for STDs (e.g., HIV, HBV, syphillis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia). Counseling and education to prevent initiation of drug injecting or high-risk sexual practices is important, especially for adolescents. Persons who inject drugs or who are at risk for STDs should counseled regarding what they can do to minimize their risk for becoming infected or of transmitting infectious agents to others, including need for vaccination against hepatitis B (144-148). Injecting and noninjecting illegal drug users and sexually active MSM also should be vaccinated against hepatitis A (149).

Prevention messages for person with high-risk drug or sexual practices

·         Persons who use or inject illegal drugs should be advised
- to stop using and injecting drugs to enter and complete substance-abuse treatment, including relapse-prevention
- programs
- if continuing to inject drugs
- to never reuse or "share" syringes, needles,water, or drug preparation equipment : if infection equipment has been used by other persons, to first clean the equipment with bleach and water;
- to use only sterile syringes obtained from a reliable source(e.g., pharmacies);
- to use a new sterile syringe to prepare and inject drugs;
- if possible, to use sterile water to prepare drugs: otherwise to use clean water from a reliable source(such as fresh tap water).
- to use a new or disinfected container (ocookero) and a new filter (ocot-tono) to prepare drugs;
- to clean the injection site before injection with a new alcohol swab; and
- to safely dispose of syringes after one use.
- to get vaccinated against hepatitis B and hepatitis A.

·         Persons who are at risk for sexually transmitted diseases should be advised.
- that the surest way to prevent the spread of human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases is to have sex with only one uninfected partner or not to have sex at all.
- to use latex condoms correctly and every time to protect themselves and their partners from diseases spread through sexual activity.
- to get vaccinated against hepatitis B, and if appropriate, hepatitis A.

Counseling of persons with potential or existing illegal drug use or high-risk sexual practices should be conducted in the setting in which the patient is identified. If counseling services cannot be provided on-site, patients should be referred to a convenient community resource, or at a minimum, provided easy-to-understand health-education material. STD and drug-treatment clinics, correctional institutions, and HIV counseling and testing sites should routinely provide information concerning prevention of HCV and HBV infection in their counseling messages. Based on the findings of multiple studies, syringe and needle-exchange programs can be an effective part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce the incidence of blood-borne virus transmission and do not encourage the use of illegal drugs(150-153). Therefore, to reduce the risk for HCV infection among injecting-drug users, local communities can consider implementing syringe and needle-exchange programs.

Percutaneous Exposures to Blood in Health Care and Other Settings

Health-Care Settings

Health care, emergency medical and public safety workers should be educated regarding risk for and prevention of blood-borne infections, including the need to be vaccinated against hepatitis B(154-156). Standard barrier precautions and engineering controls should be implemented to prevent exposure to blood.Protocols should be in place for reporting and follow - up of percutaneous or permucosal exposures to blood or body fluids that contain blood.

Health-care professionals responsible for overseeing patients receiving home infusion therapy should ensure that patients and their families (or caregivers) are informed of potential risk for infection with blood-borne pathogens, and should assess their ability to use adequate infection-control practices consistently (88). Patients and families should receive training with a standardized curriculum that includes appropriate infection-control procedures, and these procedures should be evaluated regularly through home visits.

In haemodialysis unit -do not share
* Medications
* Supplies
* Instruments

Currently, no recommendations exist to restrict professional activities of health-care workers with HCV infection. As recommended for all health-care workers, those who are HCV-positive should follow strict aseptic technique and standard precautions, including appropriate use of hand washing, protective barriers, and care in the use and disposal of needles and other sharp instruments(154,155). In chronic hemodialysis settings, intensive efforts must be made to educate new staff and reeducate existing staff regarding hemodialysis-specific infection-control practices that prevent transmission of HCV and other blood-borne pathogens (65,157). Hemodialysis-center precautions are more stringent than standard precautions. Standard precautions require use of gloves only when touching blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, or contaminated items. In contrast, hemodialysis-center pre-cautions require glove use whenever patients or hemodialysis equipment is touched. Standard precautions do not restrict use of supplies, instruments, and medications to a single patient; hemodialysis-center precautions specify that none of these items be shared among any patients. Thus, appropriate use of hemodialysis center precautions should prevent transmission of HCV among chronic hemodialysis patients, and isolation of HCV-positive patients is not necessary or recommended.

Routine precautions for the care of all hemodialysis patients

Patients should have specific dialysis stations assigned to them, and chairs and beds should be cleaned after each use.

·         Sharing among patients of ancillary supplies such as trays, blood pressure cuffs, clamps, scissors, and other nondisposable items should be avoided.

·         Nondisposable items should be cleaned or disinfected appropriately between uses.

·         Medications and supplies should not be shared among patients, and medication carts should not be used. Medications should be prepared and distributed from a centralized area.

·         Clean and contaminated areas should be separated(e.g., handling and storage of medications and hand washing should not be done in the same or an adjacent area to that where used equipment or blood samples are handled).

Other Settings

Persons who are considering tattooing or body piercing should be informed of potential risks of acquiring infection with blood-borne and other pathogens through these procedures. These procedures might be a source of infection if equipment is not sterile or if the artist or piercer does not follow other proper infection-control procedures(e.g., washing hands, using latex gloves, and cleaning and disinfecting surfaces).

Secondary Prevention Recommendations

Persons for Whom Routine HCV Testing Is Recommended

Testing should be offered routinely to persons most likely to be infected with HCV who might require medical management, and testing should be accompanied by appropriate counseling and medical follow-up. In addition, anyone who wishes to know or is concerned regarding their HCV-infection status should be provided the opportunity for counseling, testing, and appropriate follow-up. The determination of which persons at risk to recommend for routine testing is based on various considerations, including a known epidemiologic relationship between a risk factor and acquiring HCV infection, prevalence of risk behavior or characteristic in the population, prevalence of infection among those with a risk behavior or characteristic, and the need for persons with a recognized exposure to be evaluated for infection.

Persons who should be test routinely for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection based on their risk for infection

·         Persons who ever injected illegal drugs, including those who injected once or a few times many years ago and do not consider themselves as drug users.

·         Persons with selected medical conditions, including
-persons who received clotting factor concentrates produced before 1987.
- persons who were ever on chronic (long-term) hemodialysis; and
- persons with persistently abnormal Aladdin aminotransferase levels.

·         Prior recipients of transfusions or organ transplants, including
-persons who were notified that they received blood from a donor who later tested positive for HCV infection;
-persons who received a transfusion of blood components before July 1992; and
-persons who received an organ transplant before July 1992.

Persons who should be tested routinely for HCV-infection based on a recognized exposure

·         Healthcare, emergency medical, and public safety workers after needle sticks sharps, or mucosalexposures to HCV-positive blood.

·         Children born to HCV-positive women.

Persons Who Have Ever Injected Illegal Drugs

Health-care professional in primary care and other appropriate settings routinely should question patients regarding their history of injecting-drug use and should counsel, test, and evaluate for HCV infection, persons with such histories. Current injecting-drug users frequently are not seen in the primary health-care setting and might not be reached by traditional media; therefore, community-based organizations serving these populations should determine the most effective means of integrating appropriate HCV information and services into their programs.

Testing persons in settings with potentially high proportions of injecting-drug users(e.g., correctional institutions, HIV counseling and testing sites, or drug and STD treatment programs) might be particularly efficient for identifying HCV-positive persons. HCV testing programs in these settings should include counseling and referral or arrangements for medical management. However, limited experience exists in combining HCV programs with existing HIV, STD, or other established services for populations at high risk for infection with blood-borne pathogens. Persons at risk for HCV infection through limited or occasional drug use, particularly in the remote past, might not be receptive to receiving services in such settings as HIV counseling and testing sites and drug and STD treatment programs. In addition, whether a substantial proportion of this group at risk can be identified in these settings is unknown. Studies are needed to determine the best approaches for reaching persons who might not identify themselves as being at risk for HCV infection.

Persons with Selected Medical Conditions

Test for HCV in:

·         All HD patients

·         All haemophiliacs

·         Persistent high ALT

Persons with hemophilia who received clotting factor concentrates produced before 1987 and long-term hemodialysis patients should be tested for HCV infection. Educational efforts directed to health-care professionals, patient organizations, and agencies who care for these patients should emphasize the need for these patients to know whether they are infected with HCV and encourage testing for those who have not been tested previously. Periodic testing of long-term hemodialysis patients for purposes of infection control is currently undergoing discussion, and updating recommendations for this setting are under development.

Persons with persistently abnormal ALT levels are often identified in medical set-tings. As part of their medical work-up, health-care professionals should test routinely for HCV infection persons with ALT levels above the upper limit of normal on at least two occasions. Persons with other evidence of liver disease identified by abnormal serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, which is common among persons with alcohol-related liver disease, should be tested also.

Prior Recipients of Blood Transfusions or Organ Transplants

Persons who might have become infected with HCV through transfusion of blood and blood components should be notified. Two types of approaches should be used-

a) targeted, or directed, approach to identify prior transfusion recipients from donors who tested anti-HCV positive after multiantigen screening tests were widely implemented (July 1992 and later); and

b) a general approach to identify all persons who received transfusions before July 1992.

A targeted notification approach focuses on a specific group known to be at risk, and will reach persons who might be unaware they were transfused. However, because blood and blood-component donor testing for anti-HCV before July 1992 did not include confirmatory testing, most of these notifications would be based on donors who were not infected with HCV because their test results were falsely positive. A general education campaign to identify persons transfused before July 1992 has the advantage of not being dependent on donor testing status or availability of records, and potentially reaches persons who received HCV-infected blood from donors who tested falsely negative on the less sensitive serologic test, as well as from donors before testing was available.

Persons who received blood from a donor who tested positive for HCV infection after multiantigen screening tests were widely implemented.

Persons who received blood or blood components from donors who subsequently tested positive for anti-HCV using a licensed multiantigen assay should be notified as provided for in guidance issued by FDA. For specific details regarding this notification, readers should refer to the FDA document. Guidance for industry. Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Blood and Blood Components: (1) Quarantine and Disposition of Units from Prior Collections from Donors with Repeatedly Reactive Screening Tests for Antibody to Hepatitis C Virus(Anti-HCV); (2) Supplemental Testing, and the Notification of Consignees and Blood Recipients of Donor Test Results for Anti-HCV. (This document is available on the Internet at <http://www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/gmphcv.txt>.)

Blood-collection establishments and transfusion services should work with local and state health agencies to coordinate this notification process and HCV infection so that they are prepared to discuss with their patients why they were notified and to provide appropriate counseling, testing, and medical evaluation. Health-education material sent to recipients should be easy to understand and include information concerning where they can be tested, what hepatitis C means in terms of their day-to-day living, and where they can obtain more information.

Persons who received a transfusion of blood or blood components (including platelets, red cells, washed cells, and fresh frozen plasma) or a solid -organ transplant(e.g., heart, kidney, or liver) before July 1992.

Patients with a history of blood transfusion or solid-organ transplantation before July 1992 should be counseled, tested, and evaluated for HCV infection. Health-care professionals in primary care and other appropriate setting routinely should ascertain their patients/E transfusion and transplant histories as hematological disorders, major surgery, trauma, or premature birth, or through review of their medical records. In addition, transfusion services, public health agencies, and professional organizations should provide to the public, information concerning the need for HCV testing in this population. Health-care professionals should be pre-pared to discuss these issues with their patients and provide appropriate counseling, testing, and medical evaluation.

Health-care, emergency Medical, and public Safety Workers After Needle Sticks, Sharps, or Mucosal Exposures to HCV-Positive Blood

Individual institutions should establish policies and procedure for HCV testing of persons after percutaneous or permucosal exposures to blood and ensure that all personnel are familiar with these policies and procedures (see text box on next page) (141). Health-care professionals who provide care to persons exposed to HCV in the occupational setting should be knowledgeable regarding the risk for HCV infection and appropriate counseling, testing, and medical follow-up. IG and antiviral agents are not recommended for postexposure prophylaxis of hepatitis C. Limited data indicate that antiviral therapy might be beneficial when started early in the course of HCV infection, but no guidelines exist for administration of therapy during the acute phase of infection, when HCV infection is identified early, the individual should be referred for medical management to a specialist knowledgeable in this area.

Children Born to HCV-Positive Women

Because of their recognized exposure, children born to HCV-positive women should be tested for HCV infection (158). IG and antiviral agents are not recommended for postexposure prophylaxis of infants born to HCV-positive women. Testing of infants for anti-HCV should be performed no sooner than age 12 months, when passively transferred maternal anti-HCV declines below detectable levels. If earlier diagnosis of HCV infection is desired, RT-PCR for HCV RNA may be performed at or after the infant/Es first well-child visit age 1-2 months. Umbilical cord blood should not be used for diagnosis of perinatal HCV infection because cord blood can be contaminated by maternal blood. If positive for either anti-HCV or HCV RNA, children should be evaluated for the presence or development of liver disease, and those children with persistently elevated ALT levels should be referred to a specialist for medical management.

Persons for Whom Routine HCV Testing is Not Recommended

For the following persons, routine testing for HCV infection is not recommended unless they have risk factors for infection.

(A) Health-Care, Emergency Medical, and public Safety Workers

Routine testing is recommended only for follow -up for a specific exposure.

(B) Pregnant Women

Health-care professionals in settings where pregnant women are evaluated or receive routine care should take risk histories from their patients designed to determine the need foe testing and

other prevention measures, and those health-care professionals should be knowledgeable regarding HCV counseling, testing, and medical follow-up.

(C) Household (Nonsexual) Contacts of HCV-Positive Persons

Routine testing for nonsexual contacts of HCV-positive persons is not recommended unless a history exists of a direct (percutaneous or mucosal) exposure to blood.

(D) The General Population

Postexposure Follow-Up of Health-Care, Emergency Medical, and Public Safety Workers for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection

·         For the source, baseline testing for anti-HCV.*

·         For the person exposed to an HCV-positive source, baseline and follow-up testing including
- baseline testing for anti-HCV and ALT a activity; and
-follow-up testing for anti-HCV (e.g., at 4-6 months) and ALT activity. (If earlier diagnosis of HCV Infection is desired, testing for HCV RNA O_ may be performed at 4-6 weeks.)

·         Confirmation by supplemental anti-HCV testing of all anti-HCV results reported as positive by enzyme immunoassay.

Persons for Whom Routine HCV Testing is of Uncertain Need

For persons at potential (or unknown) risk for HCV infection, the need for, or effectiveness of ,routine testing has not been determined.

(A). Recipients of Transplanted Tissue

On the basis of currently available data, risk for HCV transmission from transplanted tissue (e.g.,., corneal, musculoskeletal, skin, ova, or sperm) appears to be rare.

(B) Intranasal Cocaine and other Noninjecting Illegal Drug Users

Currently, the strength of the association between intranasal cocaine use and HCV infection does not support routine testing based solely on this risk factor.

(C). Persons with a History of Tattooing or Body Piercing

Because no data exist in the United States documenting that persons with a history of such exposures as tattooing and body piercing are at increased risk for HCV infection, routine testing is not recommended bases on these exposures alone. In settings having a high proportion of HCV-infested persons and where tattooing and body piercing might be performed in an unregulated manner (e.g., correctional institutions), these types of exposures might be a risk factor for HCV infection. Data are needed to determine the risk for HCV infection among persons who have been exposed under these conditions.

(d). Persons with a History of Multiple Sex Partners or STDs

Although persons with a history of multiple sex partners or treatment for STDs and who deny injecting-drug use appear to have an increased risk for HCV infection, insufficient data exist to recommend routine testing bases on these histories alone. Health-care professionals who provide services to persons with STDs should use that opportunity to take complete risk histories from their patients to ascertain the need for HCV testing, provide risk-reduction counseling, offer hepatitis B vaccination and, if appropriate, hepatitis A vaccination.

(E). Long-Term Steady Sex partners of HCV-Positive Persons

HCV-positive persons with long-term steady partners do not need to change their sexual practices. Persons with HCV infection should discuss with their partners the need for counseling and testing. If the partner chooses to be tested and tests negative, the couple should be informed of available data regarding risk for HCV transmission by sexual activity to assist them in making decisions about precautions (see section regarding counseling messages for HCV-positive persons). If the partner tests positive, appropriate counseling and evaluation for the presence or development of liver disease should be provided.

Testing for HCV Infection

Consent for testing should be obtained in a manner consistent with that for other medical care and services provided in the same setting, and should include measures to prevent unwanted disclosure of test results to others. Persons should be provided with information regarding

·         exposures associated with the transmission of HCV, including behaviors or exposures that might have occurred infrequently or many years ago; the test procedures and the meaning of test results;

·         the nature of hepatitis C and chronic liver disease;

·         the benefits of detecting infection early;

·         available medical treatment;

·         and potential adverse consequences of testing positive, including disrupted personal relationships and possible discriminatory action (e.g., loss of employment, insurance, and educational opportunities).

     

Comprehensive information regarding hepatitis C should be provided before testing; however, this might not be practical when HCV testing is performed as part of a clinical work-up or when testing for anti-HCV is required. In these cases, persons should be informed that a) testing for HCV infection will be performed b) individual results will be kept confidential and c) appropriate counseling and referral will be offered if results are positive. Testing for HCV infection can be performed in various settings, including physicals/E offices, other health-care facilities, health department clinics, and HIV or other freestanding counseling and testing sites. Such settings should be prepared to provide appropriate information regarding hepatitis C and provide or offer referral for additional medical care or other needed services (e.g., drug treatment)as warranted. Facilities providing HCV testing should have access to information regarding referral resources, including availability, accessibility, and eligibility criteria of local medical care and mental health professionals, support groups, and drug-treatment centers.

The diagnosis of HCV infection can be made by detecting either anti-HCV or HCV RNA. Anti-HCV is recommended for routine testing of asymptomatic persons, and should include use of both EIA to test for anti-HCV and supplemental or confirmatory testing with an additional, more specific assay (figure 3). Use of supplemental antibody testing (i.e., RIBA) for all positive anti-HCV results by EIA are preferred, particularly in settings where clinical services are not provided directly. Supplemental anti-HCV testing confirms the presence of anti-HCV (i.e., routine serology). Confirmation or exclusion of HCVA infection in a person indeterminate anti-HCV supplemental test results should be made on the basis of further laboratory testing, which might include repeating the anti-HCV in two or more months or testing for HCV RNA and ALT level.

In clinical settings, use of RT-PCR to detect HCV RNA might be appropriate to confirm the diagnosis of HCV infection (e.g., in patients with abnormal ALT levels or with indeterminate supplemental anti-HCV test results) although RT-PCR are not currently FDA approved. Detection of HCV RNA by RT-PCR in a person with an anti-HCV-positive result indicates current infection. However, absence of HCV RNA in a person with an anti-HCV-positive result based on EIA testing alone )i.e.,., without supplemental anti-HCV testing) cannot differentiate between resolved infection and a false-positive anti-HCV test result, In addition, because some persons with HCV infection might experience intermittent viremia, the meaning of a single HCV RNA result is difficult to interpret, particularly in the absence of additional clinical information, If HCV RNA is uses to confirm anti-HCV results, a separate serum sample will need to be collected and handled in a manner suitable for RT-PCR, If the HCV RNA result is negative, supplemental anti-HCV testing should be performed so that the anti-HCV EIA result can interpreted before the result is reported to the patient. Laboratories that perform HCV testing should follow recommended anti-HCV testing algorithm, which includes use of supplemental testing. Having assurances that the HCV testing is performed in accredited laboratories whose services adhere to recognized standards of good laboratory practice is also necessary.

Laboratories that perform HCV RNA testing should review routinely their data regarding internal and external proficiency testing because of great variability in accuracy of HCV RNA testing.

Prevention Messages and Medical Evaluation

HCV-specific information and prevention messages should be provided to infected persons and individuals at risk by trained personnel in public and private health-care settings. Health-education materials should include a) general information about HCV infection; b) risk factors for infection ,transmission, disease progression, and treatment; and c) detailed prevention messages appropriate for the population being tested. Written materials might also include information about community resources available for HCV-positive patients for medical evaluation and social support, as appropriate.

Persons with High-Risk Drug and Sexual Practices

Regardless of test results, persons who use illegal drugs or have high-risk sexual practices or occupations should be provided with information regarding how to reduce their risk for acquiring blood-borne and sexually transmitted infection or of potentially transmitting infectious agents to others (see section regarding primary prevention).

Negative Test Results

If their exposure was in the past, persons who test negative for HCV should be reassured

Indeterminate Test Results

Persons whose HCV test results are indeterminate should be advises that the result is inconclusive, and they should receive appropriate follow-up testing or referral for further testing (see section regarding testing for HCV infection)

Positive Test Results

Persons who test positive should be provided with information regarding the need for
a) preventing further harm to their liver;

b)reducing risks for transmitting HCV to others; and

c) medical evaluation for chronic liver disease and possible treatment.

·         To protect their liver from further harm, HCV-positive persons should be advised to
-not to drink alcohol;
-not start any new medicines, including over-the-counter and herbal medicines without checking with their doctor;and
-get vaccinated against hepatitis A if liver disease is found to be present.

·         To reduce the risk for transmission to others, HCV-positive persons should be advised to
-not donate blood, body organs, other tissue, or semen;
-not share toothbrushes, dental appliances, razors or other personal-care articles that might have blood on them;and
-co