Hepatitis C infection and injection drug use: The role of hepatologists in
evolving treatment efforts
Hepatology, Volume 40, Issue 3, September 2004
NATAP -
www.natap.org
Thomas F. Kresina 1 *, Leonard B. Seeff 2, Henry Francis 1
1Center on AIDS and other Medical Consequences of Drug Abuse, National
Institute on Drug Abuse, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda,
MD 2National Institute on Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National
Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD
Abstract
Treatment regimens for both substance abuse and hepatitis C infection are
complex and evolving. New pharmacotherapy for opioid addiction allows for
office-based treatment and, thus, an opportunity for expanded treatment in
the context of hepatitis C infection. The current article addresses the
newly evolving, complex issues in the medical management of hepatitis C and
injection drug use.
Article Text
The majority of incident infections with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are
acquired through injection drug use practices. For most injection drug
users, drug use occurred in the past. However, drug addiction is a chronic
disease with a continuing possibility of former drug users' relapsing back
to drug use. Injection drug users, both current and reformed, are at risk
for HCV and other infectious diseases, and they commonly display
comorbidities associated with drug use, such as psychiatric illnesses.
Accordingly, drug users can undergo successful medical management through a
team approach that addresses not only the medical consequences of drug use
but also the frequently accompanying mental health, infectious disease, and
behavioral and social problems. Thus, HCV infection in these individuals is
a complex and challenging medical issue. HIV coinfection frequently
co-occurs in HCV-infected drug users. Recent recommendations of an
international panel of experts suggest that treatment of persons coinfected
with HCV and HIV should be undertaken not only by hepatologists or
gastroenterologists expert in dealing with HCV infection but also by
infectious disease specialists in a step-by-step approach as part of the
patient's global care and treatment.[1]
HCV treatment of active drug users was recommended by the 2002 National
Institutes of Health Consensus Conference panel on a case-by-case basis, but
the NIH did not provide guidance and support for the hepatologists or
gastroenterologists generally involved in administering such treatment. This
article addresses the basis for HCV care and treatment and the manner in
which they can be successfully administered to this challenging patient
population. These recommendations include the need for hepatologists to: (1)
become knowledgeable regarding substance use and abuse; (2) be comfortable
and comprehensive in addressing the issue of substance use and abuse with
patients, including risk reduction, relapse, and HCV reinfection; (3) become
certified in treating opioid addiction with buprenorphine; and (4)
participate in caring for HCV-infected injection drug users as part of a
global care and treatment team, realizing the importance of managing the
addiction problem in conjunction with treatment of the accompanying
infectious disease or diseases.
Understanding the Patient Injecting Drugs
The 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health[2] reports that 3.7
million Americans above the age of 12 years have experimented with heroin
use. Patterns of drug use can be categorized as experimental, as part of
normal curiosity; recreational, based on peer support or acceptance;
facilitation, to enhance skills or performance; abuse as a consequence of
pleasure seeking; and compulsive use to avoid abstinence effects.[3]
Treatment of compulsive or addictive drug use may result in complete
recovery or a relapsing scenario in which the use of drugs is intermingled
with periods of long remissions.[4] Indeed, vulnerability to relapse can
last years or a lifetime. Recent neurological imaging studies[5][6] have
shown that addiction results in profound metabolic changes in the brain. The
national drug control strategy has characterized injection drug use as a
disease with a need for treatment and support services from effective
programs that include faith- and community-based organizations.[7] A recent
study[8] has shown that for individuals who use tobacco and alcohol, there
is a greater exposure opportunity and hence likelihood for use of illegal
drugs, such as cocaine or heroin. Indeed, many drug users regard the use of
illegal drugs as a personal choice, similar to tobacco and alcohol use.
Injection drug users do not fully utilize health care services,[9] are
disenfranchised from the medical care system, and frequently require
inducement and support to access and engage in medical care and
treatment.[10] Individuals who do enter substance abuse programs often have
associated comorbidities, such as physical injuries and mental health
disorders.[11] Relapse to drug use and HCV reinfection remain medical issues
of concern for drug users in treatment. HCV screening studies have shown
that for both adolescents and adults entering the criminal justice system,
nearly one in five individuals are infected with HCV.[12][13] Thus,
community mental health clinics and psychiatric hospitals, community based
walk-in clinics, prison-related health systems, HIV clinics, and methadone
clinics are common locations for these individuals either at high risk for
new HCV infection or with already existing HCV infection. Accordingly, these
are venues in which hepatologists and others with HCV treatment expertise
could participate in providing health care services to individuals infected
with HCV.
HCV Care and Treatment and Injection Drug Use
An evolving body of data indicates that either current injection drug
use or substance abuse are not necessarily barriers to care and treatment.
Indeed, injection drug users respond to HCV treatment in a fashion similar
to those without a history of substance abuse.[14][15] Interim data from a
recent study suggest that treatment of HCV-infected individuals utilizing
methadone maintenance for the control of opioid addiction is as effective as
treatment for non-drug users with HCV infection, although general management
issues are more difficult to handle.[16] Currently, treatment
recommendations for individuals on methadone maintenance therapy, endorsed
by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and the
Infectious Diseases Society of America,[17] state that the use of methadone
does not preclude medical management of hepatitis C. However, it must be
noted that patients on methadone maintenance therapy may have difficulty in
completing interferon-based therapy regimens.
An increasing number of cohort studies report that combination therapy for
hepatitis C can be effective even for active drug users.[18][19] However,
active drug users with HCV often have substantial comorbidities that
challenge their medical management. Two essential aspects of management are
that an interactive and trusting patient-provider relationship must be
established and that patients must be deemed treatment-ready, much as is the
case for patients with HIV infection who are brought to treatment readiness
prior to the initiation of antiretroviral therapy.[20] Similarly, care
programs focused on bringing active drug users to HCV treatment readiness,
with or without modification of their drug use, would maximize HCV treatment
outcomes for this hard-to-reach and hard-to-treat population. This approach
of careful monitoring of drug-related issues together with aggressive
intervention, as needed, would increase the likelihood that injection drug
users and substance abusers who are HCV-infected and have associated
psychiatric illness would complete their HCV treatment. In this context,
clinicians must be prepared to address psychiatric conditions and drug use,
including relapse to drug use, and to integrate early interventions for
these conditions into their HCV treatment algorithm. Unfortunately, few
programs or treatment models are designed to systematically manage substance
use and comorbidities of patients with HCV prior to and during
interferon-based therapy.
Medical Management of HCV for Injection Drug Users
The basic principles of medical ethics, including the Kantian principle
of respect for person, principle of beneficence, and principle of
distributive justice, mandate healthcare services for injection drug
users.[21] These principles relate that drug-using individuals are neither
inferior to other patients nor less deserving of care and treatment, as well
as that health care providers should act to best advance the medical
interests of their patients. However, medical management of HCV in active
drug users is more difficult and more time consuming than is HCV treatment
of non-drug users. There are also concerns regarding medication
noncompliance without an adherence intervention and the possibility of HCV
reinfection with relapse to drug use.[22] Although HCV reinfection has been
demonstrated both in chimpanzees[23] and humans,[24] the evidence is based
largely on serologic markers rather than on clinical manifestations. Thus,
active injection drug users should not be automatically denied treatment on
the basis of continued drug use. When treatment decisions are considered, it
is imperative for the provider to discuss the various care and treatment
options with appropriate informed consent, detailing the risks versus the
benefits of medical options. The hoped-for benefit, of course, is the
eradication of the HCV infection, thus reducing the likelihood of
life-threatening liver disease. Unfortunately, factors associated with a
poor response, such as infection with HCV genotype 1 and coinfection with
HIV, are commonly represented among drug users.[1] Also, there is a
relatively high rate of adverse effects of the treatment in addition to the
risk for relapse to drug use. Clearly, treatment of HCV infection in
injection drug users represents a major challenge requiring a comprehensive
approach by multiple health care providers that address all conditions that
may coexist[25] and the utilization of novel approaches for care and
treatment.[19] Models of care range from referral and consultative services
to integrated care and one-stop shopping for health care. Subspecialty
consultation can occur within community-based outreach programs,[19] through
partnerships with community-based organizations that provide coordinated
psychiatric care, counseling, and case management,[26] in risk-reduction
programs,[27] within HIV clinics,[28] or in newly evolving HIV/HCV
coinfection clinics. Fully integrating HCV care and treatment can occur in
an HIV setting[28] or a substance abuse treatment program, such as that of
methadone maintenance.[30] In the latter settings, support services are
provided by nonhepatologists who would greatly benefit from the
participation of those experienced in treating liver disease. As HCV
infection becomes accepted as a primary care issue in the context of HIV and
substance-abuse management, hepatologists can support the process of
integrative management by becoming more knowledgeable about opioid addiction
and the use of buprenorphine treatment. This pharmacotherapeutic approach
will permit office-based management of opioid addiction[31] within the
setting of general internal medicine. A waiver to the Drug Addiction
Treatment Act of 2000 is obtained through physician training events for the
practice of opioid addiction therapy using buprenorphine (see http://buprenorphine.samhsa.gov/training.html).
Liver disease remains a serious medical issue for injection drug users with
HCV infection. For persons with HIV/HCV coinfection, liver disease is now
the leading cause of morbidity and mortality.[1][32] A recent multicenter
epidemiological study indicated that 46% of coinfected patients had severe
liver disease.[33] Without HCV care, management of their addiction and
associated comorbidities, and treatment for their liver disease, these
individuals are at high risk of progression to end-stage liver disease.
Thus, it is critical that hepatologists and others with the necessary
expertise become full-fledged participants in the care and treatment of
injection drug users with HCV infection (Table 1).
Table 1. Recommendations for Hepatologists in the HCV Care and Treatment
of Substance Abusers with HCV Infection
(a) become knowledgeable regarding substance use and abuse
(b) be comfortable and comprehensive in addressing the issue of substance
use and abuse with patients, including risk-reduction, relapse and HCV
re-infection
(c) become certified in treating opioid addiction with buprenorphrine
(d) participate in caring for HCV-infected injection drug users as part of a
global care and treatment team, realizing the importance of managing the
addiction problem in conjunction with treatment of the accompanying
infectious disease or diseases
A final issue that needs to be addressed: How might a hepatologist obtain
support/reimbursement for forming new collaborations and providing needed
health services to drug users? Noting that private and federal health
insurance programs may not fully support addiction treatment services,[34]
new collaborations and models of care for HCV care and treatment can be
supported as demonstration projects through Health Services Resources
Administration (www.hrsa.gov) or Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (www.samsha.gov). In addition, both the National Institute on
Drug Abuse (www.nida.nih.gov) and the National Institute on Alcoholism and
Alcohol Abuse (www.niaaa.gov) support health services research programs that
can fund treatment and health care services research projects, as do certain
foundations and pharmaceutical companies. Currently, long-term funding
sources for these services remains elusive and needs to be addressed.
In Europe, the use of buprenorphine and the expansion of opioid addiction
treatment into an office-based and primary care setting has gained wide
acceptance.[35][36] In addition, legal access to syringes and equipment are
available in selected countries to reduce the transmission of both hepatitis
C and HIV.[37] In both the Netherlands and Canada, safe injection facilities
are available to reduce the spread of bloodborne diseases.[38][39] Thus,
health services research and support by federal and international agencies,
such as the World Health Organization, encompass both safe injection
strategies and treatment issues.
References
1 Soriano V, Puoti M, Sulkowski M, Mauss S, Cacoub P, Cargnel A, et al.
Care of patients with hepatitis C and HIV coinfection. AIDS 2004; 18: 1-12.
2 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's 2002
National Survey on Drug Use & Health. Available at:
www.drugabusestatistics.samhsa.gov. Accessed June 26, 2004.
3 Comerci GD, Schwebel R. Substance abuse: an overview. Adolesc Med
2000; 11: 79-101.
4 McLellan AT. Have we evaluated addiction treatment correctly?
Implications from a chronic perspective. Addiction 2002; 97: 249-252.
5 Daglish MRC, Nutt. Brain imaging studies in human addicts. Eur
Neuropsychopharmacol 2003; 13: 453-458.
6 Wilson SJ, Sayette M, Fiez JA. Prefrontal responses to drug cues: a
neurocognitive analysis. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 211-214.
7 2003 Annual Report. The President's National Drug Control Strategy.
Office of the National Drug Control Policy. Available at:
www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/policy. Accessed June 26, 2004.
8 Wagner FA, Anthony JC. Into the world of illegal drug use: exposure
opportunity and other mechanisms linking the use of alcohol, tobacco,
marijuana and cocaine. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155: 1-8.
9 Sterk CE, Theall KP, Elifson KW. Health care utilization among drug
using and non-drug using women. J Urban Health 2002; 79: 586-599.
10 Villano CL, Rosenblum, Magura S, Fong C. Improving treatment
engagement and outcomes for cocaine-using methadone patients. Am J Drug
Alcohol Abuse 2002; 28 213-230.
11 Mertens JR, Lu YW, Parthasarathy S, Moore C, Weisner CM. Medical and
psychiatric conditions among alcohol and drug treatment patients in an HMO.
Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2511-17.
12 Abram KM, Teplin LA, McClelland GM, Dulcan MK. Comorbid psychiatric
disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003; 60:
1097-1108.
13 Allen SA, Spaulding AC, Osei AM, Taylor LE, Cabral AM, Rich JD.
Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in a state correctional facility. Ann
Intern Med 2003; 138: 187-190.
14 Neri S, Bruno CM, Abate G, Ierna D, Mauceri B, Cilio D, et al.
Controlled clinical trial to assess the response of recent heroin abusers
with chronic hepatitis C virus infection to treatment with interferon-n2b.
Clin Ther 2002; 24: 1627-1635.
15 Van Thiel DH, Anantharaju A, Creech S. Response to treatment of
hepatitis C in individuals with recent history of intravenous drug abuse. Am
J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2281-2288.
16 Sylvestre DL. Treating hepatitis C in methadone maintenance patients:
an interim analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 67: 117-23.
17 Strader DB, Wright TL, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. American Association for
the Study of Liver Disease Guidelines: diagnosis, management and treatment
of hepatitis C. HEPATOLOGY 2004; 39: 1147-1171.
18 Sylvestre DL, Hauser, P, Loftis JM, Genser S, Cesari H, Borek N, et
al. Co-occurring hepatitis C, substance use and psychiatric illness:
treatment issues and developing models of care. J Urban Health 2004, in
press.
19 Hepatitis C infection and substance abuse: Medical management and
developing models of integrative care. Proceedings Clin Inf Dis (Suppl)
2004, in press.
20 Dybul M, Fauci AS, Bartlett JG, Kaplan JE, Pau AK. Panel on clinical
practices for treatment of HIV. Guidelines for using antiretroviral agents
among HIV-infected adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137:
381-433.
21 Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th
edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001; 57-272.
22 Edlin BR. Prevention and treatment of hepatitis C in injection drug
users. HEPATOLOGY 2002; 36 (Suppl): S210-S219.
23 Farci P, Alter HJ, Govindarajan S, Wong DC, Engle R, Lesniewski RR,
et al. Lack of protective immunity against reinfection with hepatitis C
virus. Science 1992; 258: 135-140.
24 Mehta SH, Cox A, Hoover DR, Wang XH, Mao Q, Ray S, et al. Protection
against persistence of hepatitis C. Lancet 2002; 359: 1478-1483.
25 Wang CS, Wang ST, Yao WJ, Chang TT, Chou P. Community-based study of
hepatitis C virus infection and type 2 diabetes: an association affected by
age and hepatitis severity status. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158: 1154-1160.
26 Taylor LE, Schwartzapfel B, Allen S, Jacobs G, Mitty J. Extending
treatment for HCV infection to HIV/HCV coinfected individuals with
psychiatric illness and drug dependence. Clin Inf Dis 2003; 36: 1501-1502.
27 Macalino GE, Springer KW, Rahman ZS, Vlahov D, Jones TS.
Community-based programs for safe disposal of used needles and syringes. J
Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1998; 18 (Suppl): S111-119. 28
Clannon KA. Strategies for managing hepatitis C virus infection in
HIV-infected patients. Top HIV Med 2003; 11: 50-54.
29 Stringari-Murray S, Clayton A, Chang J. A model for integrating
hepatitis C services into an HIV/AIDS Program. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care
2003; 14 (Suppl): 95s-107s.
30 Strauss SM, Astone J, Vassilev ZP, DesJarlais DC, Hagan H. Gaps in
the drug-free and methadone treatment program response to hepatitis C. J Sub
Abuse Treat 2003; 24: 291-297.
31 Fudala PJ, Bridge TP, Herbert S, Willford WO, Chiang CN, Jones K, et
al. Burprenorphine/naloxone collaborative study group. Office-based
treatment of opiate addiction with a sublingual-tablet formulation of
buprenorphine/naloxone. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 949-958.
32 Bica I, McGovern B, Dhar R, Stone D, McGowan K, Scheib R, et al.
Increasing mortality due to end-stage liver disease in patients with human
immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Inf Dis 2001; 32: 492-497. s
33 Martin-Carbonero L, Benhamou Y, Puoti M, Berenguer J, Mallolas J,
Querada C, et al. Incidence and predictors of severe liver fibrosis in human
immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C: a
European Collaborative Study. Clin Inf Dis 2004; 38; 128-133.
34 Starr SB. Simple fairness: ending discrimination in health insurance
coverage for addiction treatment. Yale Law J 2002; 111: 2321-2365.
35 Krantz, MJ Mehler PS. Treating opioid dependence. Growing
implications for primary care. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 277-288.
36 Uchtenhagen A. Substitution management in opioid dependence. J Neural
Transm Suppl 2003; 66: 33-60.
37 Dolan K, Rutter S, Wodak AD. Prison-based syringe exchange programmes:
a review of international research and development. Addiction 2003; 98:
153-158.
38 Elliott R, Malkin I, Gold J. Establishing safe injection facilities
in Canada: legal and ethical issues. Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev 2002; 6:
7-10.
39 van der Poel A, Barendregt C, van de Mheen D. Drug consumption rooms
in Rotterdam: an explorative description. Eur Addict Res 2003; 9: 94-100.
|
Email:

|
|