Click a topic below for an index of articles:

 

New-Material

News Letter

Home

Donate

Alternative-Treatments

Financial or Socio-Economic Issues

Forum

Health Insurance

Hepatitis

HIV/AIDS

Institutional Issues

International Reports

Legal Concerns

Math Models or Methods to Predict Trends

Medical Issues

Our Sponsors

Occupational Concerns

Our Board

Projects

Religion and infectious diseases

State Governments

Stigma or Discrimination Issues

If you would like to submit an article to this website, email us at info@heart-intl.net for a review of this paper
info@heart-intl.net

 

any wordsall words
Results per page:

“The only thing necessary for these diseases to the triumph is for good people and governments to do nothing.”


Prevalence and Duration of Hepatitis C Among Injection Drug Users in

San Francisco, Calif.

Jennifer Lorvick, BA

Alex H. Kral, PhD

Karen Seal, MD,

MPH Lauren Gee,

MPH Brian R. Edlin, MD

Special Focus: Hepatis C

January 2001, Vol. 91, No.1

46 American Journal of Public Health

Injection drug users are the population most affected by the hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C Virus); an estimated 60% of Hepatitis C Virus transmission in the United States is attributed to injection drug use.1 Progression to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or both is believed to occur in 200/0 to 30% of infected persons within 2 to 3 decades! There are an estimated 1.0 to 1.5 million injection drug users in the United States.) To anticipate the future burden of Hepatitis C Virus-related care among injection drug users, it is important to determine the prevalence and duration of infection.

 

We tested stored serum samples collected in 1987 from 372 injection drug users for Hepatitis C Virus antibody, using the Hepatitis C Virus Version 3.0 ELISA (Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Raritan, NJ). subjects were part of a targeted sample4 of street-recruited injection drug users participating in the Urban Health Study, an HIV prevalence and risk behavior study in San Francisco, Calif. Demographic, risk behavior, and drug use history data were also collected as part of the Urban Health Study.

Of the 372 serum samples from 1987, 353 (95%) tested positive for Hepatitis C Virus antibody. This proportion is higher than the 72% found in Sacramento in 1987-19895 and the 89% found in Baltimore in 1988-1989.6 As in those studies, Hepatitis C Virus prevalence was strongly associated with length of injection career (Figure I ). Of those injecting for 2 years or less, 75.9% were infected (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.56, 0.90). Of those injecting for more than 10 years, 98.8% were infected (95% CI =0.96,0.99). There were no signif- icant differences in prevalence by race, sex, or frequency of injection. The median year of initiating injection drug use was 1972 (interquartile range= 1967-1979). Because most injection drug users test positive for Hepatitis C Virus antibody within 2 years of commencing injection drug use, 5.6 the majority of injection drug users in this sample were most likely infected by the mid-1970s and are now well into their third decade of infection. Thus, large numbers of injection drug users may be developing liver disease at this time.

Current national guidelines recommend that only injection drug users who have ceased to use drugs receive Hepatitis C Virus therapies such as interferon and ribivarin plus interferon! How- ever, the capacity of the drug treatment system in the United States is sufficient for only 100/0 to 20% of injection drug users at any given time! Given the profound penetration of Hepatitis C Virus into injection drug user communities, we must consider alternatives to this recommendation. We suggest that Hepatitis C Virus-related treatment decisions be made by the physician and the individual drug user on a case-by-case basis and with consideration of such issues as potential for adherence, possible drug interactions, and the risk of re-infection. In addition, strategies, such as outreach, incentives, and community-based treatment sites, that have proven successful in public health arenas such as tuberculosis treatment should be used in developing Hepatitis C Virus treatment programs for injection drug users. Finally, injection drug users ought to be included in trials of new treatment regimens to determine whether the treatments will be effective in this large segment of the infected population.

 

References

1. Alter Ml. Epidemiology of hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1997;26 (3 suppl l):62S-65S.

2. Management ~r Hepatitis c. Washington, OC. National Institutes of Health; 1997: 1-41. Consensus Statement 15.

3. Norrnand l, Vlahov D, Moses LE, eds. Preventing HIV Transmission: The Role of Sterile Needle. and Bleach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995:58-59.

4. Watters JK, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling. options for the study of hidden populations. Sac Probl.1989; 36.416-430.

5. Zeldis lB, lain S, Kuramoto IK, et al. Seroepiderniology of viral infections among intravenous drug users in northern California. West J Med. 1992;156:30-35.

  6. Thomas D, Vlahov D, Solomon L, et al. Correlates of hepatitis C virus infections  among injection drug users. Medicine. 1995; 74: 212-220.

  7. Lorvick l, Thompson S, Edlin BR, KraI AH, Lifson AR, Watters JK. Incentives and accessibility: a pilot study to promote adherence to TB prophylaxis in a high-risk community. J Urban Health. 1999;76:461-467.